I believe lemmy.world and other instances should start defederating lemmy.ml and other “tankie” instances.
Many users have blocked these instances for extreme political content already.
Please suggest any changes.
EDIT: ok ok ok, I understand this is a stupid idea, how about a default ban list banning lemmy.ml
You can cross off lemmygrad and hexbear. Those are defederated already.
https://lemmy.world/instances
It’s just lemmy.ml we have to talk about.
The existence of a list of linked, and a list of blocked, implies three, possibly four independent states of “instance relationship”.
Can someone who understands it deeply please explain to me? What is the relationship between a “linked” instance and a “blocked” instance, and how does that relate to “defederated”?
Does federation require active configuration from one instance to another? Or is federated the default relationship when no config data exists?
Instance Target gets linked when someone from instance Source subscribes to a community of Target
Defederating = blocking in this context, defederated instances show up in the blocked instance list
Why is this Mastadon instance blocked?
https://social.mechanizedarmadillo.com/
Seems like a random account with nothing controversial.
I think you’re looking at the wrong list. That page contains both the allowed and the blocked instances. The one you mentioned is allowed.
Fucking hell there’s a lot of pedophile instances.
I’ve had a look at it and it’s not as bad as it looks. Lot’s of websites on that list aren’t around anymore. Others are anime or hentai stuff which might be questionable at times. So from reading the list I thought the fediverse is full of nazis, extremists, trolls and loli pictures. But when doing the research it’s just a minority. Those pedos exist, though. But the blocking works.
Yep. The system is, pleasantly, working as designed, and it seems to be working well.
I dig through a bunch and have no idea what you’re talking about… I didn’t see anything.
That’s good, although I do want to crosspost to other instances like .zip
If .zip is your home instance, why do you care about with whom .world federates?
because people by nature want to amplify their opinion
Good point
Because .zip may not have a community such as this and they searched fediverse and told was the result.
Not sure I’m following you, should they not then advocate for Lemmy.zip to defederate? That would be more effective for them
I missed at the start of their post saying it was specifically about .world. Because of that my entire post is meaningless.
No worries!
Just piggybacking onto this thread to point out to the youngins who say “no worries” when I thank them for making my coffee or whatever:
This thread demonstrates the way my generation uses the phrase. It’s less like:
“Thank you”
“No worries”
and more like
“I’m sorry!”
“No worries”
Lemmy.ml federates with hexbear and grad. As a world user I don’t see hexbear and grad because world blocks them thankfully. Unless you are on server X what server X blocks in no way impacts what you see. So they need to petition their local admin.
That said. I think the only reason world still federates with lemmy.ml. is that so many open source projects communities are still there. They need to get moved off to proper instances like KDE or Mozilla have done. Or we need to start a dedicated instance for it.
I mean … why? That’s a lot of work and carving up the network … for what?
How about moving communities off of lemmy world onto proper decentralised instances? Cuz it’s a real problem that world people are happy to defederate and cut plenty of users off from their communities. That maybe they don’t appreciate the value of decentralisation and slowly pushing a federated system into merely a monolithic Reddit alternative. That maybe they’re too happy to shape the network into a reflection of their mainstream politics however much it unconvinced others across the network (which is perhaps a very spec thing to do?)
Which, BTW, lemmy ml has never done … they federate widely, have never called for defederstion from lemmy world (interesting that world would defederate first!) and never wanted to be the biggest instance despite they easily could have been.
Seems like maybe some basic moderation at the community level is all you’d need. Maybe some better tools could help … in which case spell out what that’d look like.
Moving whole communities because you don’t like some people … is a lot … and quite rich for someone on world. Maybe those communities are happy where they are (as I’m sure those on world are) and building and organising a better more flexible network is the answer rather than all of us trying to push it into the shape we want.
100 percent this.
Indeed
I’ll add to hendrik’s sibling post … it seems you’re relatively new to the fediverse. You may want to get a feel for the place before advocating for such wide reaching actions.
I’m all for expressing your feelings on an issue, but I do wonder if your eagerness is a bit premature. I myself “called for” defederation early in my time on the fediverse … and it was dumb of me.
Since then I’ve come to view most arguments around the idea of defederation suspiciously. There’s usually a bit of personal drama or a shallow opinion or people who want to loudly voice opinions without wanting to put work into making this place better. Usually, if defederation is actually needed, the admins will know before you do and it will be obvious.
All that being said … I’d ask you … what do you think federation and decentralisation is for?
I’m pretty much a natural enemy of tankies, but I love being able to talk to them.
I too view defederation with suspicion.
I think what we ultimately need is a healthy and welcoming culture of being nice to each other and engaging with each other with a minimal amount of drama. But that’s difficult to pull off and a long process. We aren’t there yet but we can make an effort.
Question is: how do we get there? Defederation might be part of that. But it’s a bad tool with lots of consequences and side-effects. And ultimately the Fediverse is about connecting people. So disconnecting them will prove to be problematic. However we don’t all agree on that. And it’s a good thing that the Fediverse is a diverse place. You can sign up at beehaw and they have a strict policy and are happy to defederate with a lot of the network. Maybe OP is better aligned with what they do, than be on lemmy.world
Honestly I’m in favor of people talking even when it isn’t nice. I’d rather have angry words than no words, you know?
Agree to disagree. If the internet was an empty space with only a few posts, I’d understand. But it’s filled with lots of stuff. And every shitty interaction I have, actively takes away time from my day. Time I could spend reading something nice and positive, actually interacting with people, learning something or doing something productive like maintaining my server or coding. I think it’s a waste. And worse than that, it also affects your mood and drives you further apart. And it’s not healthy. Every interaction defines the atmosphere of this place. Good and bad ones. The whole atmosphere becomes toxic if a certain amount of interaction is bad and people always have to expect that happening. I’ll certainly stop giving (good) advice if there is a 40% chance that I get yelled at. And I think we have to guide and steer to the correct destination and do that early. And there is precedent. We have had several attempts at re-defining social media. Once trolls and negativity dominate, the places usually die over the course of a few months or years.
As you say, it’s a very blunt tool and likely only able to create more civil interactions by creating a fairly strong echo chamber.
My perspective on “defederation” conversations, hinted at in my comment above, is that it’s a new “tool”, a new phenomenon etc. Nothing like it existed on reddit for example. And so it’s natural that there will be “unwise”, premature and overzealous calls to use it as though it’s the solution to many of our social media problems, when in reality it’s a relatively subtle tool best used in concert with active and relatively sophisticated community building and organising.
Which all makes sense to me. But what’s a little sad I think is that we have here a pretty good compromise between “absolute free speech is bad” and “censorship is bad” for social media, and instead of embracing it as an ideology we’ve gotten some loud voices eager to use it as a territorial weapon for drawing boundaries around spaces for everyone else without, AFAICT, much the same in the way of actually building spaces that suit people’s needs (though that happens too of course).
If one wants or needs a space that is shut off completely from what one would call “extreme” politics, that’s totally fine. Doesn’t mean all of lemmy world and half or more of the communities on lemmy should be cut off in a big “us and them” statement. Instead … you probably need an instance that caters to that world view. You may need to try to start organising it yourself if it doesn’t exist. Except, that’s harder than posting a “lets defederate” post.
I think I mostly agree. The thing with that, we could solve a lot of the issues with technology. Give users more tools to decide what content and which users to expose themselves to. Maybe hide or collapse content on a user level. But we just have these blunt tools and lots of fine granular tools that would be able to actually tackle the issues are missing on Lemmy. And I think we should revamp some other aspects too to foster good behaviour. I don’t see things change substancially, the way it is.
One good thing about the Fediverse is everyone can have their own instance and make their own rules. Theoretically that enables us to have a locked down “safe” space and an anarchic place with freedom of speech next to each other.
In practice most people don’t lean towards the extremes, you’re right. I want something in between. Not just a*holes and trolls but some meaningful discussions. I wouldn’t want to be on a free speech instance. But I also don’t want to be in a bubble all day. So something in the middle would be appreciated.
Tools could always be better for sure! This is still beta software after all! And the fediverse ecosystem is still finding its feet.
That being said … isn’t subscribing to communities a pretty good tool already? I ask because it strikes me that many here might be talking about the “all” feed. If so, that’d be a case of people just not using the tools given to them (and also an abuse of this system frankly).
Think I’m totally with you there. The fediverse for me has been a bit of a let down in terms of how much it has just recreated big social platforms without more experimentation. It’s early days and all so I don’t want to be harsh on all the devs. They’ve done great things. But it does feel like some basic revamping could be quite nice.
I don’t get that either. The “All” feed ist just a random pile of uninteresting stuff (to me). Lots of news of the day, memes that aren’t even funny… I think I would have left Lemmy a long time ago if that had been my experience. I subscribe to the things I want to read. But I took from a few conversations that some people like to browse the “All” feed. I still don’t get it.
I kinda lost hope that Lemmy will provide us with a new and different approach to this. The developers are kind of doing their thing. There have been suggestions and new ideas. But usually they don’t get implemented. Maybe they’re just not that progressive. And a few attempt I read about were really radical in re-defining social media. And people also don’t seem to like anarchy and freedom of speech over everything else because that just ends up being a place for trolls. I’d like to have something in the middle. And I think we’ve already learned a few things in the time Lemmy has been around.
Hi, I am the dev for Quiblr. I built a “For You” feature that tailors your Lemmy feed based on your browsing habits. Also, it runs entirely on your device (100% and no data is ever shared). The “For You” sort can be toggled like any other post filter (e.g. hot, active, etc.)
Feel free to check it out and let me know what you think!
I guess most want to discover new communities.
Maybe something like https://quiblr.com/ ?
Yea, I was surprised to learn this too. I don’t know the numbers but I’d bet it isn’t insignificant. I learned of the practice from a thread of people recommending to others that they use “All” and block all “the bad instances” to “clean it up” … and I was just kinda shocked at how much of an indifference to the design of the system and all of the community management and moderation all of the mods do not to mention an abuse of the federation mechanics to just block whole instances on a whim.
If it’s not too much to ask … do you have any descriptions or links or clues to see more of this?
Generally, there are quite a few people who feel this way about the fediverse as a whole. The sorts of people who are open to seeing all of this as an opportunity to make some progress on what “big social” did (perhaps like you and I). I’ve connected with a few in my time here (mostly over on mastodon) and the general feeling I’ve picked on is that all of this (incl the protocol itself) so far is a good “first step” or “prototype”, but that moving on to the next step and taking stock of what lessons have been learned could happen soon-ish.
I doubt you’ll find many instance admins who aren’t already aware of this. But that doesn’t mean you can’t be vocal about what you think should be fixed.
But maybe you should have a quick look at the instance list before posting. As I said 2/3 or your proposal are already done on lots of instances. And lemmy.ml is just difficult. There are still a lot of big/important communities there (and users) which we haven’t yet replaced.