Or a fork of Firefox like fennec

  • Hellfire103@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago
    • uBlock Origin
    • NoScript
    • JShelter
    • CSS Exfil Protection
    • Libredirect
    • Indie Wiki Buddy

    I also sometimes use the IceCat extensions, too:

    • LibreJS
    • LibrifyJS
    • Reveal hidden HTML
    • Searxes’ Third-party Request blocker
    • Workarounds for nonfree JS
    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Jshelter is good. You know it works because many shady websites won’t even load bx they are big bad they can’t finger print you lol

  • SapphireSphinx@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    For me:

    • uBlock origin
    • Libredirect
    • Decentraleyes (Although I don’t really know how much it really helps for privacy)
    • drspod@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most people will tell you that it’s been made obsolete now since (1) it doesn’t use behavioural analysis to detect trackers anymore, it just uses a pre-defined list of trackers to block (2) browsers (especially firefox) now have built-in tracker blocking (3) ublock origin blocks trackers by default anyway.

      I don’t think it hurts to still use it, just as a belt and braces approach, but I suppose it’s possible it makes your browser fingerprint more unique.

      • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Interesting. Fingerprinting is a good point, although I’ve switched to a combo of Vivaldi and Librewolf browsers so they’re already fairly unique unfortunately.

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      uBlock Origin is a lot better.

      Privacy Badger can actually be detrimental because it makes you more unique while adding basically nothing useful.

      • scytale@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I like how Privacy Badger replaces tracking icons/widgets. I’m guessing uBO just removes them outright? I haven’t really bothered to check the differences.

    • Carol2852@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What advantage does it have compared to extended mode of ublock? I used NoScript years ago but switched to ublock to block scripts and resources.

      • simpolomeo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        breaking websites is a good thing actually, as it disables any and all javascript and webgl tracking (and you can unbreak a website anyway if you really need javascript for it to function)

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think NoScript is a good idea in 2025. It breaks virtually all websites.

      uBlock Origin + cookie banner filters should be enough

  • JustVik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    JShelter and Decentraleyes. And uBlock Origins, but it’s already popular without me. :)

  • Undertaker@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Depends on the user.

    For me it’s uBlock Origin, NoScript, Cookie AutoDelete and Binnen-I be gone

  • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    uBlock Origin is the must have.
    Personally I also use Dark Reader, NoScript, View Page Source and User-Agent Switcher.

      • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because I’m used to noscript, I’ve tried using uBlock in stricter than default settings but found it hard to get into their flag system.
        I do not trust 1st party by default in noscript and am pleasantly surprised anytime a site works without js.

        • HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          But having two addons will make your fingerprint even larger. So your argument doesn’t explain why you should use two addons instead on one that does it both.

          • hansolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, you use one as the backup. That’s why I said use JShelter, but if a site breaks beyond use, switch IPs and then reload with NoScript instead to be more selective of what is blocked and what’s not. That way I can still block Cloudflare and Google and Apple and still let the actual site load. And JScreep seems (for me, YMMV) to treat each as distinct fingerprints.

            IMO if you know you can have multiple fingerprint profiles anyway based on which combo of extensions you use that do roughly the same job, that’s a net benefit.

  • faberfedor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Library extension. Go to as page selling a book (Amazon, Powell’s, etc.) and the extension will show you if you’re local library has the book, how many copies, and if they’re available for checkout. You can then click through and put a hold on the book.

    Great cure for impulse buying of books. I’ve read more and bought less since using it.

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wow! Brilliant! Unfortunately my local library is not in their catalogue. They do have a public catalog and even a way to get online books, also with search capabilities, so hopefully they can find a way to integrate. I submitted their data to the extension maintainers.