• agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s some kind of leveled spell joke I’m too GURPS to understand. Am I to believe that magic only works at arbitrary discrete levels? Surely any competent mage can vary the intensity of their spells with the mana they invest, no?

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Energy can be measured in discrete quanta, there is no reason magic can’t.

        To be fair though the fact that energy comes in packets does fuck me up

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I have no trouble accepting that mana exists in quanta. What troubles me is the idea that mana clusters into meta-quanta like spell slots. Also that a spell like, say, Fireball, is totally unviable except with a specific meta-quantum of mana, at which point it does 8d6 damage.

          Shouldn’t it be a simple matter to cast a weaker Fireball with less mana, or a more powerful one with more? I get that you need magic to summon fire, and a certain amount to summon 8d6-worth. But all or nothing? Why shouldn’t a 1st level slot summon 1d6 with a 5ft radius, a 2nd level slot 4d6 with a 10ft radius? One would imagine a gradient, even quantized, between Fire Bolt and Fireball.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I appreciate the invitation, but I’ve already found my forever home. It’s got variable spell effects, variable magic systems, and tools to build spells, and magic systems, from scratch.

          • Buglefingers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            A couple things from the way I understand magic in the universe, the example of fireball: some spells will come with a minimum quanta because in order to make that spell that spell you need to add mana (energy) to a minimum level to give it certain attribute(s). This is why you can always cast at higher level, using way more energy, but not less. There are other fire spells at a lower level, firebolt for instance, but it lacks the explosive attribute. The explosive attribute requires way more energy than just creating flames just to acquire so a closer example would be more like, why can’t I make it ice ball? Change the elemental attribute (much easier to change and lower costing. Probably just a restriction of game mechanics than world restriction, but potentially an issue with attribute matching)

            So I regards to the difference between fireball and firebolt, you’d start off casting firebolt and you can increase it’s power until you may as well just spend that energy on the explosive attribute. Though if you didn’t want that explosive attribute you still could cast firebolt with the same energy as fireball. I’d also assume the value coefficient for spells changes as you scale and the more efficient use of high energy costs would be the high level spells. I.E. you get more value in damage from 5th lvl fireball than 5th level firebolt.

            Another way to imagine it would be like summoning. I cast “summon frog”. I get a frog. Why can I not get a smaller frog? Because this is the size of frogs. But if I add even more energy to it I can add a growth attribute to the spell, so when I cast summon Giant frog, I get a big boi frog. If I try to reduce it, I get a French delicacy rather than a summoned frog. Alternatively I could do, summon tadpole and get something different, and weaker, but still a frog-ish attribute

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              why can’t I make it ice ball?

              As an aside, the last 5e character I played before switching was an Order of Scribes wizard, which can do exactly that.

              So I regards to the difference between fireball and firebolt, you’d start off casting firebolt and you can increase it’s power until you may as well just spend that energy on the explosive attribute. Though if you didn’t want that explosive attribute you still could cast firebolt with the same energy as fireball.

              You can’t though, Firebolt is a cantrip, you can’t upcast cantrips, they just get more powerful as you level up. They don’t even use spell slots, it’s just a different empowering mechanic entirely. Guess what though, what you’ve described is how it works in GURPS.

  • EonNShadow@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hypnotic Pattern, Haste, and Revivify are all great choices too

    But

    Fireball, Fireball, and (Fireball for Light clerics) Spirit Guardians is understandable

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      (Fireball for Light clerics)

      “What kind of holy man packs Fireballs?!?”

      “The awesome kind, that you’re lucky to afford. Now stand clear.”

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This says a lot about spells in 5e.

    Yes, there are many great choices, but one choice is usually greater than others.

    • Kayday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Come to Pathfinder, where all the spells are kind of okay I guess.
      please don’t kill me

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think my next stop on the TTRPG tour will be Blades In The Dark. I borrowed the flashback mechanic for a 5e heist and it was pretty great.

      • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pathfinder 2 is even worse in that regard. You have a few kind of okay ones and then a bunch you’ll essentially never use. The price of Pf2s strife for “balance”.

        • HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It’s probably my biggest pain point with the system. I have a buddy who only likes to play magicians. She’s miserable playing 2e because the cool evocative spells she gravitates towards just aren’t the narrow list of reliable, evergreen, and efficient spells that thrive in 2e’s ecosystem.

  • TheMinions@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Fear,Counterspell, Hypnotic Pattern, Fireball, Haste, and Revivify + Spirit Guardians (for the divine soul sorcerer) are just too good.

    Spirit Shroud is also great for Martials.

    Ashardalaon’s stride is really really fun in the right place as well. Unmitigated fire damage just for using your move speed? Not always worth the concentration slot, but by far one of the coolest 3rd level spells.

    I’m a big fan of Plant Growth too actually. But that’s more Bard and Druid.