• interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Turnabout fucking sucks.

    Way more go wrong than lights, increase car to car interactions massively, inappropriate european fad. This for place that don’t mind getting bog down doing more than an hour to get 50km away because they don’t have important things to do

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Right, that’s the funny thing about roundabouts. They’re a marvelous solution to local motor vehicle throughput. That become completely unnecessary if your traffic is anything besides motor vehicles. In fact, for bikes and pedestrians and anyone else who can look at each other eye to eye and even just talk to one another if need be, no signals or signs are necessary at all.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m waiting til it becomes normal for individuals to use old school buses as their commuter vehicles. It’s the inevitable destination of the car size war.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well yes, but actually bikes wouldn’t even need a roundabout with rules like this in the first place.

    • Aux@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      All cars will yield to a bicycle in the UK, because less protected members of the road traffic always take priority.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        All cars should yield.

        When I used to cycle, I’d just go on the pavements at large roundabouts. Not much point in being right but dead.

        • Aux@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I personally never had any issues. British drivers are very polite and cautious.

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Welp, I’m not in the UK.
        Over here, people go with - what is the most threatening to themselves - and it really feels weird that people who have presumably passed the driving exam are worse at roundabouts than me.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m a daily cyclist and I think I’d be terrified to bike through a full roundabout. They’re absolutely marvelous designs for throughput that doesn’t require complex signal automation, but the flip side of that is they’re pretty hostile if you’re not a motor vehicle. Any truly good roundabout design should include pedestrian and cycle paths along the periphery that have priority when crossing the circles entrances.

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        On the other hand, I am not expecting a cycle path for me when I am going around the normal road speed. Just if people start understanding the cycles are also traffic and not something to be plo’d over.

        But that’s not the thing either. It feels like people are just playing a game of ‘chcken’ all over the place.

  • itsralC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok, now do one where C and A arrive at the same time to an empty roundabout and A still, to this day, thinks they have the right of way. Because why wait a fraction of a second when I can make others wait for a lot longer?

    I hate having classes in a classroom with windows pointing to a roundabout because I get to realize how NO ONE seems to do them correctly… (In Spain, for reference)

    • mmddmm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      A does have the right of way over C. And the OP has a quite violent interpretation of transit rules that only make sense if it’s a large roundabout with a low speed.

      Also, the pink car has the right of way over both. Both are quite right at stopping there, and D is invited to keep stressing themselves to death.

      Now, if the pink car decided to stop and wait for A, then it maybe is worth pointing it to them.

      • itsralC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I got my driver’s license pretty recently and in driving classes I was always told to look at the left first to see if anyone is inside the roundabout, and then to the right to see if I have to let someone go before me (on small roundabouts). Think it from a logical standpoint: A wouldn’t even need to completely stop to let C in first, while, if A goes first, C needs to stop and wait while A passes in front of them.

        It may be a new rule, because no one seems to know about it (or pay it any mind).

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Really? I thought you never look to the right in a roundabout. You look to the left, and if it’s clear, you enter and look forward until you exit. That said, I’ve never been to a small enough roundabout that there could be a conflict just after entering.

        • mmddmm@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The OP’s idea here is that since A is stopped, C has plenty of time to enter the roudabout. That’s reasonable if the roudabout is large, and crazy if it’s not.

          Your idea that C can enter anyway, even if A didn’t stop is just crazy.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depends on the size of the roundabout. For one big enough they could both join simultaneously and maintain a safe distance, that’s fine. If not, if you drive on the left the one on the right has priority and vice versa for the rest of the world.

      In fact it’s only a problem if people arrive simultaneously at all junctions, since now there’s no person to the right of everyone.

      In this case usually everyone stops (unless one of the cars is a BMW or audi) and then someone will start to move first. After which normal operational rules are restored.

      • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        if you drive on the left the one on the right has priority and vice versa for the rest of the world

        Isn’t that backwards? US we drive on the right and if 2 people arrive at a stop at the same time you yield to your right, the rules would extrapolate out to the same at a roundabout time, googling and looking at the CA handbook produced squat so the rules might be “fuck it” here, actually

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nope. People are on a roundabout and in the UK you will be going clockwise. So traffic on the roundabout is coming from your right.

          I’ve driven in Italy/Germany and it is the opposite. People are going anti clockwise so you have to give way to your left.

          The principle is retained on mini roundabouts where you give way to people on the entrance/exit to your immediate right (or of course traffic already on the roundabout) even though those work most similar to 3/4 way stops.

          Stop signs don’t need to follow logic of traffic movement direction so you I suppose give priority to the right because being on the right side of the road they are easier to see? I’m not sure where those rules were formulated though.

  • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    C may be right to yield depending on where pink and yellow are going and the speed they’re doing.

      • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s a small roundabout and it’s prudent to wait a second to see what they’re doing. Being impatient isn’t a good trait when driving.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Signaling is not useful in a circle because it’s on the opposite side of the car. By the time you see the signal, it’s too late to make a decision based on that anyway.

          As you approach, you should adjust your speed to fit into traffic in the circle. Don’t look for signals, just look for cars.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      this just here, we don’t have many roundabouts but, the amount of drivers who think it’s a race to get from point a to point b is unreasonable. I’m not about to enter the roundabout as car c if the pink or yellow car is flying with no indicators.

  • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Car D is going to have to wait for car A no matter what

    Assuming no cars come after yellow car, it doesn’t matter if car C goes or not.

    Honestly it’s nicer because car D doesn’t have to move up a car length to yield.

    Yes they could get screwed very hard though

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well couple of things.

      You don’t know how long C has been incorrectly yielding. There may well have been enough time for them both to move onward.

      Also there’s nothing to say that A isn’t a yet undiscovered C.

      I’m from the UK so roundabouts are second nature. I’ve been an accidental C before. Where I had to wait for a lot of cars that had priority over me. When it finally was open for me I was zoned out. Luckily the car behind me was very polite and just used a short beep of the horn to bring me back to reality.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not how roundabouts work. They’re really simple:

      1. Look left and enter when clear
      2. Look straight until you exit

      That’s it. This only gets complicated if traffic is backed up, in which case everyone is going slow enough for it to not matter.

      • clove@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nice, I don’t know why, but I was picturing the pink car going fast enough to squeal their tires like they used to in the one nearest where I live. We only got roundabouts here a decade or two ago, so they’re still a novelty to most. I don’t drive much, as you can probably tell.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, speeds in a roundabout should be very slow, like 15mph/20-25kph. Bigger ones can handle a bit faster traffic, but they’re not designed for high speed, but lack of stopping.

          And I envy you, I wish I didn’t need to drive as much.

    • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You not following the rules because you assume everyone else isn’t following the rules is why no one is following the rules…

      • clove@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t follow the rules only because I don’t drive at all. Otherwise, yes, you are correct, I don’t follow rules which endanger my life. Just weird that way.

  • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    C is yielding to a pedestrian, but carbrain D cannot fathom yielding to anything smaller than their car.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s no pedestrian in the image.

      Cars are bad enough as it is that we don’t have to imagine more problems with them.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      We’re this a 2 lane roundabout, car d would be changing lanes to bypass car c, nearly striking that pedestrian

      • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It took me three attempts to parse

        We’re this a 2 lane roundabout,

        Your mistake is even harder to type than the correct ‘Were’!

      • freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Pedestrian crossing without traffic lights at a 2 lane roundabout entry? That’s just murderous design.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Traffic lights on a roundabout kinda defeats the purpose doesn’t it? might as well signalize the intersection

          • gnu@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Signalised lead ins are helpful to solve flow issues caused by an imbalance in traffic direction at certain times of day. When you get too much traffic building up that can’t enter the roundabout due to no gaps you activate the red light before the entrance dominating traffic flow to give a period where the other directions can move through. The actual roundabout works as per normal and you don’t have to deal with lights during non-peak periods.

            Lights on a roundabout make it not really a roundabout but an unholy mishmash of intersection design. I’ve got one near me and the only thing going for it was that converting a roundabout was significantly cheaper than the flyover intersection it really should be made into.

        • glitchdx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Try a 3 lane roundabout entry. I cross that shit twice a day on my commute to work every fucking day. Other options are very far out of the way as to make them non-viable.

          I always wave on traffic so that I may cross when it is safe. Sometimes, a car stops to let me through, and refuses to move. I won’t go, because I can’t see the other two lanes past the car that is stopped. Four times in the past year, that car was rear ended by a massive fuckoff truck. For whatever reason, they get pissed off at me, not the guy that rear ended them.

          • goldfndr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Does turning your head/body to face away from that car that refuses to move help much?

          • freebee@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I only once encountered it in Czechia near Plzen with 2 lanes. Think it took me 5 minutes before I could/dared. Can’t imagine it with 3. Crazy dangerous situation. Stay safe!

  • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Ive had the ‘pink’ car stop in the roundabout and motion, me as the ‘A’ car, to go. Like i dont even anymore.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are specific times when this might be appropriate. For example if I am turning off at the exit after where the car is joining from, I can see they’re indicating to making a move around the inner part of the roundabout which is clear, and if I proceeded I would join a queue for my exit and block them. I’ll usually stop short and gesture they move in.

      But otherwise it’s usually safer all round to stick to the rules.

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Really? I see them when travelling to London all the time. I used to live in London too. A very common occurrence and if you want to keep traffic moving, allowing people that can proceed to do so, just makes sense to me.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I get in and out of those roundabouts as fast as possible

    I don’t mind the design, I think they’re great and save time and reduce traffic congestion

    I just don’t trust drivers of this generation to use them properly. We are currently in a transition period of generations … an older generation of drivers that didn’t grow up with these and a newer group who will think these roundabouts will be normal. As long as these old timers (including me) are around, these traffic situations will be dangerous.

    Which is why, when I get to these roundabouts, I get in as quickly as possible and get out as quickly as I can

  • AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, nothing here is wrong but I have rarely had C being my primary issue when dealing with roundabouts. Idiots randomly entering the circle with no regard to other cars, THAT I’ve encountered quite frequently…

    • Romkslrqusz@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Biggest problem I encounter is people failing to signal their exit

      So I end up being C because I yield to a bunch of bozos who didn’t communicate they were’t going to come my way

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well we can kinda only go when the signal is accompanied by another indication like slowing and or beginning to turn - “never trust a signal” eh?

    • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Or badly designed ones with a combo of yield and stop signs that effectively prevent the people with the stop sign from ever proceeding

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The only real problem I regularly encounter is on two lane roundabouts.

      If you want to take the first exit you need to enter in the passenger side lane.

      If you want to take any exit after the second you need to enter in the driver’s side lane.

      If you enter in the passenger side lane, you must take the first or second exit. Taking any exit after the second from the “outside” lane is gonna cause an accident.

      I see this happen a few times a year. It’s so common that most drivers foresee it.

    • StannisDMannis@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s because Americans don’t know how to use them, once you live in a place where people use them OPs picture becomes your issue and you never see yours.

      • AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think that’s location specific, I’ve lived in a few different places in the US that had roundabouts, although I’ve always called em rotaries in the northeast.

      • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        My city (US) used to have one that was signed all wrong, so cars already inside the circle would have to yield to the ones entering. Naturally this led to congestion instead of flowing traffic. Also it was way too close to a tangential road so that made things even worse because the backed up traffic on that side then affected cars that weren’t even going to the circle.

        Fortunately they ripped that shit out and redesigned the entire intersection.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Americans have a hard time driving, period. They can’t “keep right unless passing”, they can’t understand 4-way stops, they can’t understand traffic circles, and so much more. So frustrating and dangerous here.

        • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yesterday, I had to drive for at least 15 miles behind a transfer truck doing 45 because an idiot decided to cruise in the passing lane right beside it. I see it at least once a week.

          What’s so hard about understanding the left lane is THE PASSING LANE. FOR PASSING CARS IN THE RIGHT LANE?!

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s completely F’d up. In the region I live in there are a lot of 3-lane highways (6 lanes total). People “cruise” in the #2 lane and treat it like the slow lane which forces faster traffic left and right around them in the #1 and #3 lanes sometimes going 5 under the limit, often confounded by a #1 lane camper going the speed limit or just a few over. Nobody obeys any sort of rule or has a clue they aren’t being the asshole. They refuse to keep right or yield to faster traffic.

            • tromars@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I know that „there must be a German word for that“ is became a meme, with lot of fake words being thrown around, but I’m not even joking: There’s a German word for that lol ✨Mittelspurschleicher✨

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I was just thinking yesterday that if Trump actually wanted to do good he could convert all these people he’s hiring for ICE into some kind of traffic enforcement agency and send all the dumbasses that can’t drive properly to el salvador. This thought happened while I was stuck in a drive through that some moron had blocked the exit of by pulling up too far.

              • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I have to agree.

                I’m old, and most roads were 2 lane when I was a child. These problem didn’t exist then.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some larger roundabouts work that way. Most (in)famously the arc de triomphe in Paris.

      Where I live there are two of these

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      “if I randomly stop in the middle of the road so another car can get in, the car right behind me probably won’t hit me”

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Cyclist here.

        Someone did that for me, so I tried to rush across the street to not hold up traffic.

        Woke up a few weeks later in physical rehab, not remembering anything because of the TBI. Evidently I was in the hospital for about three weeks. No recollection!

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh God I love that its just so hulaeuosly dumb when it happens

      I just put my hands in the air and yell at them