• mmddmm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Oh, to have both the realization that everybody is a complete moron, and the urge to punch them because of it…

    • techt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      How does this lead you there? IQ 100 is already the average by definition, so no matter how moronic people are as a whole this chart will look the same

    • deeferg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Yeah I saw this and all I could think was “Mad! The guy is going to be mad about all of the stupid while also knowing he can’t use his fists to make it (actually) better”. A constant cycle of never having all of the solutions or a way to feel better.

  • Bogus007@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    So, because women have a much lower content of Testosterone, we can conclude that there are much more stupid than men or what does this silly correlation wants to tell us???

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      women have a much lower content of Testosterone, we can conclude that there are much more stupid than men

      This poster is High T. Ask me how I can tell.

      • Bogus007@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Understand the meaning of question marks, you do not? Much to learn, little Padawan, you still have.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      It’s about men but your takeaway would be that women are smarter because as IQ goes up, Testosterone goes down

      • drascus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        this graph very clearly states it’s only related to men and has nothing to do with women at all. the only thing it shows is that the majority of men have average intelligence and average testosterone levels. R2=0.19 value means only 19% of the variation in testosterone levels can be explained by IQ, leaving 81% unexplained. This is a very weak relationship, bordering on statistical noise.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            The thing about very superficial analysis like this is you can just go fishing for correlations and come back with something meaningless but publishable.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        His takeaway is that women are as smart as men (as in the IQ is the same) but because men have higher testosterone holding them back men are actually smarter than women. What I think he’s actually trying to say is that he’s a high testosterone misogynist.

        • drascus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          If that is someones takeaway they are wrong. This chart essentially shows that these things are not actually correlated.

        • Bogus007@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Your conclusion is based on deduction which in many occasions - like this one - leads to false conclusions. Try again.

    • drascus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      The only thing this graph shows is that average people are average. This graph essentially shows no -> very weak correlation between testosterone levels and IQ. in fact I would say this graph argues that correlating testosterone levels with IQ is essentially flawed. However because of the way the data is represented it makes it look as though there might be a correlation.

      • Bogus007@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        AFAIR the R2 is (almost) equal to rho in the Pearson correlation. I just see two variables, a linear fit from - possibly - an OLS. The small R2 is likely due to the outlier (though a single outlier by this mass of points raises my eyebrows as the MSE (or take the RSME) won’t be affected as such by a single point when there are 15’000 points centered closely around an estimate, but CCV would tell) and R2 says nothing about the p-value, which is determined by the amount of information in a system/about variables, and hence likely way below 0.05.

        This relationship aka in this case correlation says pretty much nothing about real world, because IQ is (possibly) not only determined by IQ, but way many other factors. The picture is utterly simplified. It is similar to the relationship between the number of babies and the number of storks.

  • perestroika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Hypothesis A:

    • his name is J. Random Error

    Hypothesis B:

    • he’s real, has a brain anomaly, and is taking androgen antagonists (e.g. 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors) for breakfast, lunch and dinner. It’s not testosterone which has most biological effect, but dihydrotestosterone. T is just the guidance signal from the brain. DHT does the heavy lifting in tissue. If you don’t want to operate on the brain, you can block the result and leave the guidance signal going wrong.
    • Grumpy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      I googled but could not find source. I only found more memes based on this graph. Which isn’t to say it’s fake, could simply be in some research paper hidden away under a paywall. 15k sample is a very big study though.

      The graph alone is highly problematic to make any argument though as it doesn’t specify other critical axis such as age which would highly change the meaning of this graph. The older you are, T levels fall, but your IQ increases. So age alone can potentially explain the phenomenon we’re seeing here.

      My attempt to find the graph only resulted in many counter points, however.

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Some people have crazy testosterone levels for medical reasons. StyroPyro did a YouTube video a few months back about his testosterone levels.

      Hope he’s doing alright. He didn’t know why they were elevated at the time.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Smart Hulk.

    There’s probably severe health complications with that level of testosterone though.