I can’t believe that after thousands of years humanity still struggles with “an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.”

When under attack, defend yourselves. When a potential possible attack some time in the future seems likely, or when a benefit provided by society via democratic system is taken away, if you attack preemptively then you’re probably just a POS.

We might be happy this time, but the next person might kill somebody we like. They might feel emboldened to target trans folk and democratic socialists. If violence escalates to riots then one side might start gunning the other down in the street. The only people who want the poor and ignorant to kill each other are enemies of our society as a whole.

You do not get to decide who lives or dies. No one does.

Not really, the guy could have died from any cause and I would still be happy about it. In fact, if he got sick and died from a tropical fungus I would be much happier.

A more apt hypothetical is if the porn was a byproduct of human trafficking but the victim was responsible for killing 300,000 Dolphins.

And the Guy’s name was Fauci, who Trump hates so much that Biden is preemptively pardoning him.

On a sidenote, after Republicans panicked over an Ebola outbreak in the USA then President Obama followed strict procedures to contain the outbreak and created an Pandemic Playbook for future presidents to use as guidelines. You know the rest.

Nothing has changed OP. We each protect what is important to us individually.

For the assassin, that meant dealing with the threats to him and his family directly. (Or maybe he was just crazy, or maybe both)

You’re not judge, jury, or executioner so don’t even try to be.

I wouldn’t call him a hero. We know nothing about them. They’re just the result of a societal sickness.

Ha ha yeh string up all the officials in the USA and gut them all like pigs. Next lets make Donald Trump our leader for life and his kids after him.
/BigSarcasm

Lmao “anti-intellectual” for correcting you. Okay pal.

If they weren’t burning tho, $20 is $20.

I wouldn’t really frame this as a Capitalist vs Anticapitalist event.

More like normal human vs inhuman.

You know why the Laissez Faire Capitalism term fell off so much that you might never have even heard of it? Because hardly anybody exists who actually subscribes to that bullshit. Your supposition that “liberals sadly bought into” it is merely your delusion fueled by propaganda.

You don’t need a new term for that, they already have “Laissez Faire Capitalists” or even just “Capitalists”.

Any form of liberalism that leads to decreased rights and opportunities, including ideology of stripping away protections, is by definition no longer liberalism.

The bare definition of Liberal means to advocate for personal freedoms, including but not limited freedoms enshrined in law such as marriage, religion, speech, and press. It is often associated with capitalism in terms of political affiliation. “Neoliberal (New Liberal)” is just some shit that Tankies came up with because they get flamed every time they complain about regular Liberals.

Ah man, you really hit me with the No_You there

The vast majority of pundits in hindsight have noted that the Harris Campaign’s attempt to attract moderates and turn over conservatives failed spectacularly.

That highlighting looks like that thing Google AI does.

Is OOP taking screenshots of Google AI and then reposting it to his friends? What a moron.

It’s a “both sides bad” meme at its core generalizing a large group on the words of a few. The reason he was the VP pick is because he was more conservative than the presidential nominee.

Alright, but do you actually know somebody who would be your She-Hulk Bottom in that hypothetical?

/joke

Neoliberalism isn’t a real thing, no group or ideology with any representation fits any definition of it, the only people who use that word are tankies and conservative puppets.