• Railison@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    We need more browser engines, especially those that are under NFP ownership. WebKit and Chromium have become too dominant.

  • alvanrahimli@lemmy.ml
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ladybird is extremely amazing project. Andreas is a good person, with great community around him. The only thing I didn’t like is the new logo - it is very meta-ish. Looks very corporative, and doesn’t really resemble browser :(

  • laxe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s great to build a completely open browser from scratch and I want to follow updates from the project. They have a Twitter account but not Mastodon sigh

      • ccdfa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        The other day I was reading some GitHub issues involving an issue I was also having and the maintainer of the project was directing people to their discord server to talk about and hopefully resolve the issue. On top of that, they came back to the GitHub issue and just posted that after some discussion (on Discord) the issue had been resolved. Totally useless to me and anybody else who might be searching for that thing.

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I am still trying to decide what I think about the Ladybird / SerenityOS split.

    Short-term, this is going to make it a lot easier for Ladybird to make progress. So good.

    Long-term, I feel like a lot of the values that Andreas used to express about SerenityOS have been compromised.

    I very much liked the, everything from scratch and complete harmony within and complete control over our whole stack idea that came with the mono-repo.

    I also thought that the energy from Ladybird was greatly contributing to SerenityOS. That is lost now, as is their chief architect, technical steward, and community organizer.

    Much of the low-level performance work that went into Ladybird benefited the whole OS. Did SerenityOS even post a monthly update on YouTube this month? The community engagement has already been dampened.

    SerenityOS was certainly benefiting from the networking, codec, and image format work. The biggest impact will obviously be the loss of what was emerging as an amazing native web browser. They cannot even use Ladybird now due to the reliance on so many third-party components. I guess it forks from where it was?

    How is error handling done in Ladybird now? It was beautifully consistent before. What now?

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t think there really is a need or use case for Serenity OS outside of a hobby project. However, having a new web engine would be great for the open web. I just hope they take privacy seriously.

  • neclimdul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    “I know what a lot of you are thinking” Yeah what about Firefox? “It’s impossible to make a new web engine” Um… No … Probably not that hard really with pretty decent standards these days. Performance JavaScript is probably pretty hard and a lot of the fancier protocols.

    Seriously, what makes you better than Firefox?

    Whatever, another choice isn’t bad I guess.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Firefox has its own set of issues. It is the best we have right now but we could benefit from another choice.

  • BB_C@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    A reminder that the Servo project has resumed active development since the start of 2023, and is making good progress every month.

    If you’re looking for a serious in-progress effort to create a new open, safe, performant, independent, and fully-featured web engine, that’s the one you should be keeping an eye on.

    It won’t be easy trying to catch up to continuously evolving and changing web standards, but that’s the only effort with a chance.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Though I am a big Rust fan, I think Ladybird is evolving fast enough that my money is on Ladybird to become a true daily driver first. The biggest obstacle to that is JavaScript as Ladybird still uses its homegrown engine ( very slow ) and Servo is integrating SpiderMonkey.

      Ladybird just got a million dollar shot in the arm. We will see what becomes of that.

      Despite the Mozilla origins, I do not think you can say Servo is backed by Google. The claim from Ladybird is that it is the only browser not financially supported by Google.

      I would say that Servo is corporate backed at this point and Ladybird still is not ( backed by donations only ) but with large donations by a single donor, we will see if Ladybird is able to stay completely independent over time.

  • quaff@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Neat. But it’s kind of concerning to see yet another OSS project hitch it’s community resourcing to Discord.

    • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, it’s a bit at odds with their “free from corporate influence” angle. Absolutely no reason to not use Matrix.

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I actually do not like Discord and wish they did not use it. That said “absolutely no reason not to use Matrix” is clearly an objectively untrue statement.

        Andreas has always been very pragmatic. He will choose the tools he likes best.

      • XNX@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        How does the make it non free from corporate influence. The hate boner towards discord is getting ridiculous sometimes. Yeah it sucks to use a repo thats not googleable and not open source bur discord is an objectively better user experience than matrix

        • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          How does the make it non free from corporate influence.

          Do they require Discord and depend on it? Yes.
          Is Discord corporate? Yes.
          Are they then still free from corporate influence? Nope. H Simply put, if Discord suddenly implemented weird rules the Ladybird devs would have to comply with, they’d simply have to follow suit or break their main communication channel.

          • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            And of course something will likely happen like that. They couldn’t help themselves, so it’s inevitable.

        • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          How does the make it non free from corporate influence.

          Do they require Discord and depend on it? Yes.
          Is Discord corporate? Yes.
          Are they then still free from corporate influence? Nope.

          Simply put, if Discord suddenly implemented weird rules the Ladybird devs would have to comply with, they’d simply have to follow suit or break their main communication channel.

        • JJLinux@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          We see these things differently. I would argue that Matrix clients are better organized than Discord. That said, not only is Discord a privacy nightmare, but ilthe interface is only pseudo-organized at best.

          • toastal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            All the Matrix clients are buggy using far too many resources & the protocol is slow as balls about joining new rooms while being wasteful about data duplication for throwaway bits of text/multimedia. I don’t think eventual consistency is the right model for chat & following Slack & Discord’s model is the way.

            • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Slack & Discord both use eventual consistency?

              Btw I agree with you that Discord is better UX than Matrix, but your comment doesn’t make much sense

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I wonder what’s in it for Shopify. This seems like an odd thing for them to sponsor, or a very expensive FU to Google.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well, it could be genuine altruism. But I doubt a web totally controlled by Google sounds good to a company that relies on the semi-open web for its business.

      This is a bit like Valve liking Linux I imagine.

  • Undearius@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is the first I’m hearing of Ladybird. Looks really interesting and glad to see there are more options coming

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Why are we shouting?

      As long as it doesn’t become a way for Shopify to shovel ads and collect data it isn’t a problem. We will watch with great interest

    • Hominine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      How can you be “independent” if you have sponsors? All sponsorships are in the form of unrestricted donations. Board seats and other forms of influence are not for sale.

      …per the FAQ.

  • moreeni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    TL;DR: The Ladybird browser, which was written from scratch and aims to be an alternative to corporate-backed browser, now has a non-profit organisation behind it. Also, it got additional funding of 1 million dollars. The end.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Thanks, this was hugely helpful. For some reason half the comments here made it about politics.

      Interested to see where this new software actually goes.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Ah, now I can be excited for them and move on with my day. I get that video presentations can be great for feature releases that need visual aids, but I don’t want to sit through a video for details that can be summed up in two sentences.

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Then don’t watch it. I have spent more time now reading this complaint on Lemmy than I have watching videos that were not worth my time.

        The guy that made this video had a few minutes to make a high-engagement video I guess and no time to write a low-engagement press release. That was his choice.

        Your choice is to watch it or not. He does not your views. Videos do better regardless of your opinion.

        I actually agree with you but I am just sick of reading this comment on every video posted. Use tech to transcribe it yourself or just don’t watch. Stop making me read this complaint. Unlike video, I have to waste time reading before I realize what you are saying.