I’d like to see just how horrible someone can make a site. Facebook is a good contender.

  • stinky@redlemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    With Facebook and x.com you pretty much understand the risks going in.

    But with stack overflow there’s so much naivete required to create an account and begin asking questions. The good stuff is laid out right in front of you: people asking similar questions and getting thoughtful responses to deeply technical questions. It feels rewarding to get your first answer approved.

    But then after months of “trying” you hit the wall. A sudden deluge of hostility and toxicity. Bipolar moderation staff suddenly deciding your content has no value and dumping you on a curb at night with a shitty smug comment, to the applause of bloodthirsty hoards of bootlicking trolls.

    Nothing could have prepared you for this. It’s hell. All of your work for nothing, any chance of justice or restitution gone. Every promise broken.

    It’s insidiously evil and I hope every member of their staff (unpaid moderators included) goes bankrupt and loses their home to foreclosure.

  • Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Reddit.

    Fragile Mods. Shitty trolls. Dishonest engagements. Little to no good discussion. Opinions are seen as attacks. Power-tripping users and mods alike. Karma whores.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just less users, making the bots more visible. You’ve had repost bots all through, we just assumed it was actual people trying to score cheap karma.

    • anothermember@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The only way I’ve worked out how to even save Instagram images locally is using the page information (ctrl+i) Media tab in Firefox and sort through it to find it there. Terrible for an image hosting website.

      • hogmomma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not an image hosting site, it’s a social media site whose goal is to keep you coming back for more. The easier it is for you to save their content locally, the less likely you are to spend as much time on their site.

        • anothermember@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          And the fact that people flock there despite that is a way I feel more and more distant from humanity…

          • hogmomma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            If you’re running Windows, though, you can use the Snipping Tool to grab the part of the screen you want to save, which may or may not have an image in it.

              • lad@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Doesn’t that call the same snipping tool? Anyway, saving from source may preserve quality a bit better

                • elephantium@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I don’t think so. I’ve been using PrintScr longer than the snipping tool has existed.

                  I’m not sure what “saving from source” would be for a screenshot. What do you mean there?

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think the time I was like 7 and was looking at hamster photos on Google to print and cut out. Scrolling along I couldn’t find any that looked exactly like my hamster named Cinnamon after a black streak along his back.
    Getting to the 3rd or 4th “load more” buttons on Google and it started showing me stuff that wasn’t hamsters I got desperate. I saw there were a few images that had text along the top and bottom, “for more cute hamster photos go to xhamster.com”.

    So naturally, I went there.

    Turns out xhamster.com was not a site where hamsters share selfies and is, instead, pornography.

  • emmetcooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    In terms of social, political, and geopolitical harm, no platform beats Facebook. At least in X there are community notes. In Facebook, none of that.

    • hactar42@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is amazing how toxic people on that site are. Especially when you consider it’s not anonymous and the people are literally in your neighborhood

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    fcc.gov. Those goddamn “Sign into the Federal Fucked Up Document System with your FFUDS PIN now” things that just don’t actually work. The layers of garbage between you and renewing an amateur radio certificate is truly Idiocratic.

    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This sounds very similar to the Kentucky online portal for teacher certification. It looks like it was made in 1996, and it functions slightly less well than it looks like it should.

  • Battle Masker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Publisher’s Clearing House.

    So this company has ads on local free tv stations in the US about how you could win $5000 a week for life, but when you go to the website it’s like 97% ads and maybe 2% contests, and some contests are straight up unenterable if you have an adblocker. Then before you can officially enter, you have to go through 3 pages of ‘as seen on tv’ crap that it tries to sell you before you can finish entering. Also it lags like a motherfucker with or without an adblocker, cause there’s so many ads taking up that much bandwith, cause heaven forbid a webpage ad be a static image. And of course you have to have an account, so your spam folder and paper mailbox fill up with the worst things possible.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I finally got my appleTV subscription cancelled, and that took three fucking tries. No, I don’t have an iPhone or an appleTV unit, so I’m now free.

    • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Ugh, still to this day, persistant file storage is either “the cloud” or file APIs that altho secure, don’t allow for saving overtop of existing files. really annoying.