Even gamers nexus’ Steve today said that they’re about to start doing Linux games performance testing soon. It’s happening, y’all, the year of the Linux desktop is upon us. ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ

Edit: just wanted to clarify that Steve from GN didn’t precisely say they’re starting to test soon, he said they will start WHEN the steam OS releases and is adopted. Sorry about that.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is so great to see, and the timing is perfect.

    My son already calls the PC Steam, as in “we played game A on Xbox and game B on Steam,” so maybe by the time he has a PC in his room Steam really will run the whole platform.

  • argarath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    This is the fifth person I see misinterpreting what Steve said about doing Linux performance testing, they aren’t going to start doing this soon, they will only start doing it WHEN SteamOS is released for desktops! It was very clear on the video FFS

    I’m also really fucking excited for that tho, I recently switched to mint and helldivers 2 actually feels smoother than on windows, it has been such a good experience!! I cannot imagine how much better things will get with more people jumping to Linux and thus game makers actually pay attention to us

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve been daily driving Linux since 2017, I started with Ubuntu and it’s been great. I recently got a Lenovo T14 Gen 1 and put Linux Mint 22 on it, and I’ve been playing some games on it and it’s been pretty nice for such a portable laptop.

      • argarath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Thanks you! And sorry if I was too aggressive, reading it again it sounded way more aggressive than I expected, I just wanted to sound energetic instead, my bad

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m excited, but I wish gpu manufacturers would jump on board with physically compatible cards with ffs or smaller form factor business machines. HP, Dell, et al like to limit space for traditional GPUs in those machines. If there was a half height mid/low grade gpu with components on the reverse side that would be a great couch gaming machine.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        If I recall Intel’s GPUs are a little slimmer right? But I’ve heard middling results with compatibility and such.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I have the sparkle brand intel low profile single slot in an hp sff PC and it barely fits and leaves about 3/8" space between the power supply. It has all the room in the world in the backside. One slot over is a 1x pcie slot if only hp had switched the two or the video card had straight through and out of the case cooling.

  • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    In my case it’s a sign I might should try out PC gaming again. I’ve been console exclusively for like 15 years now because so few games used to work. But with Steamdeck’s popularity we might actually start seeing more than 10% of games getting native ports 🤞

    • DesolateMood@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      At this point we don’t even need native ports. Developers can just make a windows version and we can play it with proton

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Having more developers natively release for Linux implies removing influence from Windows and making more people realize it is a viable option for daily computer use.

        It’s not just about gaming at this point, it’s about changing an entire paradigm and erode monopolies.

        Can you imagine a Linux “monopoly” on personal computers? The dumb discussions about using Arch, Fedora, Debian or Suse? It would only be hot air escaping mouths because under the hood every development on one side is feeding improvement into the entire ecosystem.

  • Noved@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    New to the Linux community here; why is a valve owned Linux OS better than any other massive company OS. Like if Microsoft released their own Linux OS, would it be good suddenly?

    At the end of the day, we don’t want our OS’s big company owned right?

    • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s way easier to move from one Linux distro to another if Valve starts enshittifying SteamOS (which would really suck) than it is to move from Windows to Linux. Either way this is a good stepping stone that’s well supported.

    • Grofit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not answering your comment directly, and I don’t even use Linux, BUT…

      One reason a lot of us don’t use Linux even if we really want to us because it’s biggest strength is also one of its biggest weaknesses, that being it’s modularity.

      There isn’t a single packaging system, window manager, file system, shell, etc etc.

      This makes it hard for companies (and devs in general) to target Linux for releases. For example you want to release something for Windows, you build a single exe, apple is a dmg (I think) etc so you just build for one single platform with a consistent API.

      When you want to build for Linux there can’t be just one build/package. This has actively been cited as reasons why some commercial software doesn’t support Linux, as it takes far more effort to support all major permutations of platform and package management.

      So back to your question, why is Valve’s Steam OS going to help? Because it’s going to be a single platform with a single way of doing things. You can always go and replace the bits like any Linux distro but out the box it will be easy enough for vendors to support, it will hopefully also get more adoption because it has commercial support.

      Look at Android as an example (I know it’s not entirely the same), but that is just a customised version of Linux, but as it’s consistent and has a single way to manage packages it’s widely adopted.

      I am pretty sure Linus himself said how one of the reasons why Linux desktop doesn’t have mass adoption is because no one can agree on how things should be done, so we have hundreds of libs all doing the same thing in a different way. Valve will pick what they think is best (even if it isn’t technically the best) and through that we all have a singular point of effort and adoption to centralise on.

    • Heavybell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I am not gonna use SteamOS. But if a bunch of regular folk do, then it might convince peripheral and game makers it’d be worth putting in a modicum of effort to support linux. That’s why I’m excited for SteamOS.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Like if Microsoft released their own Linux OS, would it be good suddenly?

      It’s worth noting that steamOS, like any Linux distro has its issues and a bit of a learning curve. Especially if you want to go off the beaten track, it’s pretty much just using a stock arch distro.

      As for if MS switched to Linux, no it wouldn’t be good because the issues with Win11 overwhelmingly aren’t a matter of incompetence or anything inherent to the code, but of conscious anti-consumer business decisions. There’s nothing about Linux that would actively stop MS from cramming telemetry, bloat, etc. In their distro.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Valve dosnt really “own” SteamOS. They maintain and update SteamOS, but SteamOS is free and open source

      Plus just about everbody who knows anything about steam would tell you they are probably the most consumer friendly billion dollar company ever, and have been for decades. So yes even if they owned it like microsoft owns windows it would still be better

    • john89@lemmy.caBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      SteamOS is better than, for example, macOS and Windows because of licenses.

      Since you’re new (welcome!), I should let you in on a little secret: pretty much the entire free software movement is built around licensing. I know, it’s boring and seems insignificant. But the outcomes are profound.

      Because SteamOS is built to function within the free software ecosystem, it means users are never beholden to the decisions of one centralized entity (usually the company that owns the software patents.)

      If Valve ever decides to, say, include candy crush ads in SteamOS’ start menu (they’d have to make their own start menu, since right now SteamOS uses one that’s already made by the free software community), then users can choose to remove that part of the menu or replace the menu altogether without having to start from scratch.

      For wealthy people who can always pay the “proprietary tax,” this might seem like a non-issue. Practically speaking, these people only want their software to work without hassle. They don’t care about the true cost of that software, such as only one entity being able to modify/distribute the software. It’s not until, say, photoshop starts charging a subscription (which they can always increase the price of) that people start to see the value in free software and the importance of licensing.

    • Biorix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Because it’s open source and based on the Linux kernel. It’s owned by them but you can do what you want with it. You can’t with Windows.

      So if a game works on the Steam OS, it works on pretty much any distro

      I game with Steam on Linux, but I’m not using Steam OS

      Also, that means that every effort made by Valve to improve compatibility is beneficial to everyone.

      Edit: Also, even if it were closed source, I think it would still be good as it gives us alternatives to Windows. But

    • beaiouns@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If it’s like the steam deck version, it’ll be based on Arch with a bunch of steam-specific patches/configs to make games run more easily (with the added bonus of making non-steam games run pretty well too). Steam exists to sell games, and if they want to make it easier for me to play games, that’s fine by me.

      Not sure what a Microsoft distro would look like, but if they make a distro that’ll run Xbox games with gamepass, I’d give it a shot.

      Another nice bonus for either/both of those situations is that it wouldn’t be too hard to incorporate those changes into other distros. That way people who want more of an “install and go” experience would have their official distros, people who like to tinker could work on importing the official code into their unofficial setup, and people who use arch btw can install it from the AUR.

    • Tankton@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The source is always free so you could fork it if you disagree with them. Also it means broader support for Linux gaming

      • john89@lemmy.caBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m glad people bring this up.

        Private companies are not intrinsically better than public ones, but at least they have the capacity to be.

        Valve is one of the very few examples of a company that sees the value in working with customers, not against them. This would be impossible if Valve were publicly-traded.

          • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            To be fair, that was in their own financial best interest. Since arbitrations are charged a fee per customer someone figured out that you can do an effective “class action” against valve by having many people submit the same arbitration claim against valve and costing them so much through the arbitration fees that it it was almost impossible for them to cone out on top regardless of the outcome of the arbitration (iirc).

            They changed to allowing lawsuits because they can request those to be merged, and therefore its cost-effective for them to fight them.

            • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Since arbitrations are charged a fee per customer someone figured out that you can do an effective “class action” against valve by having many people submit the same arbitration claim against valve and costing them so much through the arbitration fees that it it was almost impossible for them to cone out on top regardless of the outcome of the arbitration (iirc).

              It’s not even that they’d have to pay for it; usually the filing party has to pay. Valve tried to be the good guys and while they did push for arbitration they said that they’d pay your arbitration fee for you, basically allowing you to file a legal complaint against them at their expense.

              And then some fucking legal company figured out it’s a neat loophole on how to bleed them through arbitration where the point isn’t really the result but the costly process. Guess that’ll teach Valve to try to be better than others. :|

    • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Microsoft is deeply entrenched and has undergone decades of enshittification. SteamOS is at only the beginning of this cycle. And since SteamOS is linux-based, it’s likely to have ramifications for the whole GNU/Linux ecosystem. Furthermore, if there are two vastly different OSes that developers and graphics card manufacturers need to seriously target, they’re more likely to write more platform-agnostic software that everyone can benefit from.

  • picnic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Really nice. Been waiting for this. I’ve used linux for two decades but kept gaming pc separate last years as I’ve became lazy. Now I’ll likely decommision that one and just rdp into my work windows machine if needed.

    Thanks gaben

    • Omega@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It already started with a lot of gaming communities, but most of what I use is already in Linux so no Biggie for me, productive apps being moved is likely very far into the future

      • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve already seen a lot of work for audio production in Linux but still would love to see more from other industries

  • john89@lemmy.caBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve been saying for years: we need a dedicated gaming operating system.

    • Coriza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Or even better, a dedicated gaming runtime environment. And that env can then be made multiplatform.

    • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      No we don’t. Who needs that? That’s what consoles are for. Every time I want to play on my computer I would need to dual boot and change to the OS? That’s nonsense

      Game Devs and device driver Devs need to get their shit together and fix things.

      • john89@lemmy.caBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        cloud native

        Already rings an alarm bell, but thank you for sharing regardless.

        Also, their website runs like shit. I don’t have much hope for them making a gaming OS that doesn’t, but time will tell.

        • asap@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          That is astoundingly judgmental. Good lord.

          Cloud native is a weird term I’ll agree, but it just means container based.

          Bazzite is amazing and worth a try. I’ve been using it as a daily driver for nearly a year now.

          Perhaps you’d prefer the Github over their “shit” website: https://github.com/ublue-os/bazzite

          Or perhaps you’d like to positively contribute to the state of Linux gaming, and make some suggestions for the website in their post just for that: Requesting input: Bazzite’s website

          • quarterlife@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            At this point when people tell me the website runs like shit I just laugh and tell them they’ve been filtered. That does 120 FPS on a phone, if you’re lagging on that site just go ahead and give up on gaming.

            • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              The animations are stuttery for me on … Fedora Linux.

              I bet they’d be smooth as butter on Windows. x)

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This could lead to some sort of controlling mechanism that will check if your OS is actually SteamOS, otherwise some kind of DRM would prevent you from playing online for example. I’m weary.

    Also people are forgetting that gaming isn’t the only thing people use their computers for. They are convenience devices. They want to game on the PC they also use for other things. They will not switch for gaming only. Companies who sell software will see this and start piling on their controlling mechanisms, tracking, … More proprietary things will come, I mean games already are, and they are not in the spirit of Linux.

    I’m bad at expressing my thoughts, but I hope you understand what I’m trying to say.

    • john89@lemmy.caBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not really. The “control mechanism” is already in place for games that rely on Steam’s infrastructure for their online functionality.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have about 7-9 months to decide what to do with my PC. I don’t want to move to windows 11. Because I will have to basically fresh-install my entire system that has 4 drives and god knows how many antiquated programs on it from the XP, Vista and 7 era that I still use. and Im just not ready for it. Im too busy

    headache

      • spirinolas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’ve went from 7 to LTSC. I didn’t realize how cool LTSC was until I had to use a W10 machine at work. There’s a good chance I’ll go full Linux when the support ends but I’ll have enough time to consider it.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Its just gonna be a question of how unsecure Win10 gets , and how fast.

        My pc is from 2019, although I’ve upgraded the hardware several times. But I’ve basically reached a ceiling of practicality, its no longer practical to upgrade anything. Im on an outdated chipset (AM4) and jumping from a 3080 to a 4080 isn’t really going to fix the problem of games just being unoptimized. It makes more sense to build a new PC than it does to just change OS on this.

        but right now, it just doesnt make sense to build a new PC either… I dont lift a finger on anything unless im going to be able to see at minimum 20% performance increase, I just dont see that without emptying my savings account…

        • polle@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Not a good advice. A friend of mine is still on win7 and it still works and got security updates time to time. But some programs actually stopped working or only older lts versions remain workings. Win10 is probably still ok for a year or two.

          • biptoot@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Absolutely not. Windows 7 may still function, but it is a target for unpatched vulnerabilities. Attackers are actively seeking windows 7 hosts for remote code exploits, lateral movement, and privilege escalation.

            Do not run Windows 7. Stop running Windows 10 after the end of life date next year.

          • Sheldan@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            They did still release a few ones recently for them. But am5 is the main one right now. It’s not incredibly old, just no new ones will probably be produced. (I think the last am4 were a surprise already) Just for curiosity, why did you go with am4?

            • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              might have been a deal. some retailers are dumb and think lower number means worse, so discount justified. lol

                • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  They are end of life now and have ceased production, but if you can manage to find a 5800X3D , that CPU is the definition of sleeper. I had a 5700X I think it was, and the performance boost was f***ing unreal, I expected meagre gains, I saw 20 to 50% performance increase on many games. if you’re into that kind of thing. if you see one for sale, seriously think about grabbing it.

                  its the whole reason aside from the OS issue, Im not even remotely worried about the next few years, it can compete with the high end stuff of the AM5 generation still. unreal.

          • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Realistically the AM4 is still more than enough for now. but its technically end of life. the AM5 isn’t worth the jump until theres no other option.

          • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            No worries about that, it was a bad wording. The company has stopped producing it, and that’s it. Your cpu is fine, compatible with current software, and can serve you well for still a long time.

            Corporations were so successful in promoting consumerism, that they already messed with us on a psychological level.

          • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I bought one when I upgraded my truenas, solid performance paired with good names and motherboard, no issues.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    When SteamOS releases on all devices people will say “I’ll switch when every peice of Windows software is compatible” or some other unreasonable and impossible accomplishment. Even if every peice of Windows software was compatible people would say “ill switch to Linux when it looks and functions identically to Windows”.

    • souperk@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It helps to think about this as a spectrum, as more features become available more people will make the switch to Linux. Not everyone will be able to swich to Linux at the same time, and some people will never switch.

      Gaming was major bottleneck, even I, a person using Linux full time for the past 20 years, I used to maintain a Windows disk to play games. Only in the past couple of years I was able to sunset my windows setup, hopefully to never touch windows ever again. I had to drop a couple of games but it got to the point where rebooting to a OS wasn’t worth it, as most of my games worked flawlessly without any tweaking.

      There are many major pros to the Linux desktop environment, but we still need major software applications to become portable. The workflow of an average office worker is still not Linux compatible. Of course there are office alternatives, but they are not as easy to use. Though, IMO the oss world is hurting by trying to copy ms when their products are so horrible… Hopefully, the EU will drop some major cash at the issue with all these talks about digital sovereignty.

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yep. I recently started using bluesky and it’s filled with linux hate posts farming likes. People just complaining about random things that don’t even make sense.

      I believe fomo is a real thing. Even if one doesnt play fortnite or valorant or kernel level shit, they still are afraid of missing out. So unless and until Microsoft goes bankrupt, I doubt Linux will replace it.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Man that’s sad, because I was considering it just because it had a stronger “Network Effect” than Mastodon.

        That FOMO is pretty real though. These multiplayer service games are a flash in the pan sometimes, where once their heyday is over, they become “Hey remember that old game?” and there might be some reverse-engineered private servers running from like, Lithuania, with 4 people online after that lol.

        I feel this pretty hard with Helldivers 2. I had a BLAST with the first game! Loved it! And apparently this one is good too!

        But Sony is determined to be Sony, and it’s got kernel-level requirements, so nope, I’m missing out. It does suck, because before all the drama I really looked forward to it. It genuinely looks fun. I see my friends playing it. Oh well.

        Watching Arcane made me almost wanna fire up League of Legends again, but once they announced their anti-cheat, I quit forever. (Probably for the best, let’s be honest lol.)

        So yeah with an OS, I think people feel like some killer app will come out and if they’re not running a system it was tailor-made for, they’ll miss out on it entirely.

        • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yep. I thought it was filled with left but it’s mostly liberals. They get very easily offended when any of their capitalist hobbies or tools are endangered in a conversation.

          About the arcane part agree. For me its esports. Watching it makes me want to play but I know none of the things I enjoy watching will be in ranked lol(teamwork). Linux not supporting kernel level anti shit is a feature for me lol. I would jump right back to my valo addiction otherwise.

    • specterspectre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      With bottles, boxes, and all the other small environment virtualization solutions available right now, switching to Linux with a few ‘almost native’ Windows application is easier than ever. The mileage will vary from distro to distro. I’ve managed to get bottles to run some annoyingly old statistics software I need for work. It works great. Sometimes it can be a bit of a headache to figure out where the software saves files but playing detective for a file somewhere in the system is better than enduring all that Windows imposes on the user.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          For all my disc games or other just standalone .EXE stuff, Bottles has been nothing short of mind-blowing.

          I’d say the Flatpak might be your best bet if you’re on a rolling distro.

          My only other tip is to make sure you set your Bottles directory to wherever your storage partition is, as it’d probably fill up your /home by default pretty quick!

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    As long as they can keep it rolling stable, which is possible even with arch, I can see this pickup up a bit, especially for new users.

    Plenty of users are sick of windows 11.

  • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I just did that. I have a dual boot laptop where Windows was used exclusively for games, and instead of upgrading that I built myself a PC with an AMD GPU (Nvidia, fuck you!).

    So far I haven’t run into any problem that I couldn’t easily solve, and the only games that won’t run are those demanding I install an anti cheat system, but I’m fine not playing those.

    • Capsicones@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Very nice! I wish I could use an AMD GPU, but sadly machine learning keeps me on the CUDA platform. Gotta make a living. That said, recent NVIDIA drivers got better on Linux. I can finally use Wayland problem free now. Games on proton also work just fine.

      However, this only works well on Arch, BTW. Really wish I could just use Debian. I’m a computer scientist, but I also get tired of an avalanche of software updates every couple of days; I don’t need all the latest and greatest software. My German internet commection also means I wait up to half an hour sometimes.

      • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Funny enough, I’m on Arch by choice. I was using it before but it makes sense as having the latest packages is good for gaming on it. Luckily I’ve just been upgraded to a FTTH connection so I’m good on that front.

        I had to go back to Xorg though because Wayland was doing some weird shit.