• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      It really hit the right balance, it prompted discussion in what is (hopefully) a productive manner by highlighting mass support for violence against billionaires compared to the actions of AES states. Hopefully people start reading Marx after this.

  • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is good agitation. Im not a blanket supporter but its been a good thread with a lot of decent links worthy of critical support. Lemmy world needed this lmao

    • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      When you see them seethe through the entire script and react to articles like you showed a cross to nosferatu you know they’re learning without their consent

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    One is a regular person taking out a person of huge authority, balancing power.

    The other is the biggest authority taking out a smaller one to consolidate power.

    • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Please show your work. What is the proof that it was done to consolidate power?

      This isn’t to mention that your use of the word authority is strange. How exactly do you determine who has more authority between a US house representative vs. a CEO?

    • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Consolidate ? he’s the leader of a 90 million strong party and been at the reins for more than 14 years lmao. I stg libs’ understanding of politics can be directly mapped to Harry Potter.

            • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              Bet, it’s just been like a hundred comments of the same three talking points from liberals in .world. The reason it’s not just bad because it’s a “bigger authority” is because of the class character of the state, as well as the subject of the oppression. Lenin dedicated an entire book to the subject, State and Revolution.

              It’s good that there’s a bigger authority than capital, the party rules through popular consent, and they chose Xi Jinping as well as the people that do the actual legwork of the anti corruption drive to be the executors of that will. If the US had a popular mandate that prevented corporate abuses, Luigi Mangione wouldn’t have needed to be incarcerated, he would have already gotten his surgery.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          He’s going around calling everyone that especially when it doesn’t fit because he just learned it’s an insult.

        • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          The comment I replied to says:

          Working class rebel vs Elite class looking for more control

          Notice the part highlighted in bold. I am asking for proof of this. In other words, proof that the Chinese government executed CEOs only because they sought “more control”. Surely we are not expected to blindly trust this claim, right?

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            So it’s planned economy that you’re disputing

            I really can’t think of any proof that you would believe if you’re disputing that

            • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 days ago

              So it’s planned economy that you’re disputing

              No.

              My question is very clear, why can’t you address it without pretending I asked something else?

              Again, you made the claim that CEO executions were made for the reason of seeking more control. Please provide proof that they were done for this reason and not any other reason. I have not asked for planned economy proof or anything else.

                • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  How do you twist yourself up in knots to not even get in the general vicinity of an evidence-based position and not wonder "damn, do I really not know shit about the stuff I’m so loud about "?

          • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Surely we are not expected to blindly trust this claim

            Why not? They did when the CIA told it [to the journalists that repeated it] to them.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          When everyone is using Class in a specific manner, the addition of a “class” that doesn’t actually exist just for a quip is really odd. You have to make the argument that it even exists in the first place first.

        • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          So which non-Marxist political economy or sociology defines this elite class? Usually class politics is attributed to Marx

  • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I see people ask “what tankie shit” quite often

    Thank you for the violently clear example to link to you blind idiot

  • forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Many of the chronically online social media poster (read: western professional class) are closer to the CEO than they are to any other group. The temporarily embarrassed millionaires as they’re also known.

    Statistically a not insignificant number of them are millionaires by net worth. Especially when we consider demographics where it’s mainly tech workers. But of course that doesn’t count because of some indeterminate line between evil CEO and average Joe who worked hard.

    The cognitive dissonance is that they’re all part of the same system. Climbing the same ladder. In any other context these people are bragging about being executive of some random startup or whatever.

    • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      They’re not, they just think they are. They’re every bit as oppressed and the sharing of the imperial spoils hasn’t been a thing since at least the fall of the USSR, once there was literally no alternative. Now there is an alternative but the population has been so thoroughly propagandized that you mention any enemy of the State Dept and they start frothing at the mouth.

    • Miaou@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Non-westerners’ view on what life is like here always amaze me. Then they complain they’re not rich besides earning “a lot”, because they’re fed the propaganda that we’re all dirty imperialists exploiting them. No, most of us are not millionaires. Most of us can’t even buy a place to live without enslaving ourselves for half our life to bankers. But OK buddy

      • forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I am a westerner. No other comment. You’ve already made up your mind. And I can’t be assed to talk over what ever incronguencies you have of mindset.

        we’re all dirty imperialists exploiting them

        Okay just one comment I’ll have to withold else I’ll probably get banned for insulting your intelligence

      • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Which is why the rest of us is confused about why most of y’all so rabidly do the propaganda work for your oppressors. Y’all consistently get to the line of class consciousness and then do a 180 and sprint in the opposite direction whenever it concerns foreigners.

  • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    One isn’t a corrupt dictator killing or imprisoning anyone who complains about him. If you think the little guy isn’t getting hurt in China I want the drugs you’re on.

  • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    All this comment section proves is that if the only thing that changed was that Thompson was a Chinese healthcare CEO called Zhao Qiang and got clapped by the government libs would be calling him a working class hero and a martyr like the fucking NYT.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        I have not seen a single Marxist make this claim. Deng wasn’t pro-billionaire, but wished to return to a Marxist analysis of the PRC’s economy. It had taken on an ultraleft character and was unstable, they had socialized more than they should have with their level of productive forces, and have consistently been working their way back to that level of socialization now that the Socialist Market Economy has proven wildly successful. Without doing so, extreme poverty could not have been eradicated like it has been.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    The difference is whether or not the CEO is working against the people or against the government.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Over 95% of people support the CPC, so it’s fair to say that the people approve of the way the CPC is handling billionaires that are highly corrupt or otherwise guilty of mass crimes. If we ask Harvard themselves about the results of their study, they say “We find that first, since the start of the survey in 2003, Chinese citizen satisfaction with government has increased virtually across the board. From the impact of broad national policies to the conduct of local town officials, Chinese citizens rate the government as more capable and effective than ever before. Interestingly, more marginalized groups in poorer, inland regions are actually comparatively more likely to report increases in satisfaction. Second, the attitudes of Chinese citizens appear to respond (both positively and negatively) to real changes in their material well-being, which suggests that support could be undermined by the twin challenges of declining economic growth and a deteriorating natural environment.” This directly goes against claims of “social credit” preventing this, moreover the “Orwellian Social Credit System” hinted at doesn’t even exist, at least not in the manner most think it does. Even more overtly, they state "Although state censorship and propaganda are widespread, our survey reveals that citizen perceptions of governmental performance respond most to real, measurable changes in individuals’ material well-being."

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          They literally linked you a study from harvard, because we know you white supremacists consider any non-western source as being inferior, and would reject them out of hand.

        • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Ah, yeah, true democracy is when everyone fucking hates congress, the supreme court, the president, their senator, their cops and their prosecutors, but they have no choice but to accept them.

          Y’all get to be sassy on Twitter tho, good for you lmao

          • Traister101@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            I have never and will continue to never use Twitter. It was a shit hole long before Eron Musk bought it and made it a haven for terminally online Neo Natzis. I love how the immediate reaction whenever anybody says something slightly not in favor of the CCP you tankies do this kinda stuff lmao. Believe it or not people can believe things simultaneously, like maybe CCP is not great and also US not amazing?

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          It isn’t a dictatorship, source on it being one please? Secondly, I outright bolded where the western study outlined that the biggest factor in approval was the real material improvements in their lives. Why do you think you know more about a country than the billions that live there?

          • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            You’re wasting your time, if living in that shit hole and having to pay out the ass whenever their bank, insurance, landlord, ISP, or utility company wants to pad out their margins while their politicians get bribed by them isn’t enough to convince them that they’re the ones living in a dictatorship, nothing short of total societal collapse will.

  • gravityowl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Every now and then, the .ml side of this community comes through with these inaccurate tankie memes. You win some, you lose some I guess…