cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15995282

Real unfortunate news for GrapheneOS users as Revolut has decided to ban the use of ‘non-google’ approved OSes. This is currently being posted about and updated by GrahpeneOS over at Bluesky for those who want to follow it more closely.

  • tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this not a sign of the true intentions on both sides of the dilemma here!?!?
    Let us go to the end. We cannot afford to carry on in fear of these bans. Let the lines be neatly placed and the sides chosen wisely. If sustained profits are desired, the walled-gardens must come down.

    Vote with your dollar and vote again with your data. Wary, but never afraid is the motto privacy comrades!

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. Leave immediately to other services, and tell them why you’re leaving. It might not make a dent, but you’ll be doing the right thing at least.

  • yoshisaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    man, and i was gonna switch to graphene this christmas. if every app can just ban my OS, i might have to rethink this. i would use the website but they restrict so many things to apps now…

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Use a browser like Native Alpha or Hermit, which present a website like an app.

      And if you use Bitwarden/Vaultwarden for your passwords, it can be pretty seamless.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      TBF, this is the first time I’ve encountered an app not working - and it was before this. It’s just because of Google push towards monopoly via their Play Integrity API that’s ruining this.

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        play “integrity” should be considered malware, any program that deliberately does something the user doesn’t want it to should.

    • The 8232 Project@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, switching to GrapheneOS shows that you don’t care what those companies do and that you’re willing to fight. It means those companies lose one more customer.

    • Im_old@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was about to switch bank because for a few days my current one (inadvertently) blocked it on grapheneOS. We sent them a few emails and they fixed in less than a week.

      • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use a small local credit union that doesn’t appear on their supported list. It’s literally the only thing holding me back, I’m tempted to say fuck it anyway. But I wonder if it might work anyway…

  • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t switched my phone yet, but will do so soon. Does anyone have experience with compatibility layers on phone, akin to wine? I unfortunately cannot go without my public transport apps, and they’re android or IOS only. I’ve looking into postmarket OS, but open for suggestions.

        • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most EVERYTHING works unless your app dev is PoS like these guys.

          Another alternative is MicroG which might work better in light of recent development.

          How zealous are you on dumping google?

        • killingspark@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well yes and no. The point is to stop using Google. And that entails quite a few things you might expect a phone to do

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can take a look at calyxOS, it’s what I use. Android but with all Google telemetry ripped out. It’s not as resistant as graphene against a govt adversary, but for privacy, better battery (bc google stuff isn’t constantly running) and still being able to use everything, it works great.

    • anti-idpol action@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What public transport apps if I may ask? Most of Western Europe and especially Germany present no issues and even have OSS options, same with Finland.

      • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the input, i realise it’s been a while since I checked this! ÖBB Scotty, ÖBB Tickets (could forgo this one) and SBB mobile. I also need Digitales Amt (official government app for things like signing contracts without printing them, ordering your election materials to a different address than usual, checking your medical info etc). Do you happen to know whether that would work?

        • anti-idpol action@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t know and sadly my Pixel got stolen recently, but you can see if Offi or Transportr meet your needs, they’re available on fdroid.

          I guess I have bad news for you regarding the government app: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/253-compatibility-for-austria-e-government-app

          Anyway depending on your threat model keeping a normiephone as a decoy and mainlining something like graphene os can be a good opsec decision.

          • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nice, thanks for the tip! Also thanks for going through the trouble of finding out for me, I appreciate it! I’m unfortunately in one of the regions where it’s specifically not available. But the second phone thing might be an option. That, or just a compatibility layer with regular old android after all.

    • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe graphene will find a way into duping those apps to think you have a regular android phone?

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      On the other hand, it makes it easy to find which apps aren’t to be trusted with your data.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also very obvious when an app or website have an US and an EU version. You just know they buttfuck the Americans because no rules.

        Even Apple had to make two versions of iOS.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This makes me want to use GrapheneOS more. If the dataminers don’t want you to use it then it must be doing something right.

      • Realitätsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s only officially supported on google phones because sadly those are the only ones that are not modified to fuck which makes installing and supporting other OS’es way too much work.

        Giving google money once for a device is not a problem from a privacy or security standpoint.

        • Samsy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s correct, but not the reason grapheneOS chooses only pixel phones. It’s the level of hardware security features.

          • Telex@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Also unlockable and presumably has well working builds. It’s not just graphene, but just about every Android project it there that’s best supported on pixels. Other manufacturers have a crazy variety of locking schemes and required tools. Each one is a nightmare to support.

            • orange@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              For GrapheneOS, it’s primarily that it’s re-lockable. That’s why other unlockable phones aren’t supported.

              The GrapheneOS install process sets new OS signing keys so you can lock the phone again and get full verified boot. However, most manufacturers haven’t implemented this feature.

              • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                What do you get, app/feature wise for verified boot vs. Play integrity app? Does it increase the amount of apps that work on it?

                • orange@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, Play Integrity intentionally checks if it’s a Google-approved key. Android itself has an API to check verified boot and gives info on the signing key - most devs just want to know verified boot is working.

                  I feel Play Integrity has a short life ahead of if competition authorities realise how exactly it works. “Anti-competitive” is the first thing policy-minded folks think when I explain the API to them.

        • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wish they’d at least support Fairphone.

          If Graphene reached out to them I bet Fairphone would even actively work with them to make it an official OS option.

          • ryannathans@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Someone installing graphene os for security shouldn’t be trusting random second/third/etc hand hardware lol

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Shouldn’t trust anything then. They could intercept your new phone and modify it. They did it for switches. But your not worth it for “them”.

              • Telex@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hypothetically the hardware could have been modified, but that would take some insane level of a determined attacker to be fabricating modified pixels just to sell them on the used market.

                • Anivia@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, this would only be a concern for targeted attacks by state actors, in which case not even buying new would be safe.

                  Thinking about it, in such a scenario buying used may even be safer

                • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It also comes with a hardware auditor, although you need another trusted graphene phone to use it. I don’t know about the details, but sounds very hard to mess with it.

                • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Nothing too hypothetical nor an “insane” level of work. Didn’t Israel do just that with some beepers to blow up children?

        • 50MYT@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your options are:

          Apple phone

          Bloated android phone like Samsung etc.

          Chinese android phone (xiami etc)

          Google phone with Android

          Google phone with graphene. This still looks like the best of those options.

          Or no phone? I guess people are hardcore enough that will be the option.

            • SeekPie@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t think LOS has any privacy/security improvements over the stock android?

              (IIRC) it’s even worse than stock because you can’t lock the bootloader after installation.

              Though if your phone isn’t getting official updates, it’s probably safer with LOS.

              • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                (IIRC) it’s even worse than stock because you can’t lock the bootloader after installation.

                That’s a problem with the phone manufacturer, not with Lineage.

                • SeekPie@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, I myself am using CalyxOS, because DivestOS doesn’t support the Fairphone 5 unfortunately. CalyxOS also has relocking.

                • Not with GrapheneOS, since you can entirely disable the USB controller from the settings on a driver level, making it impossible to connect the phone to a forensic data extraction device. GrapheneOS also has a convenient auto-reboot feature, which (together with their patches to the Linux kernel and Fastboot recovery OS to include memory zeroing) erases the encryption keys from memory, putting the device in BFU state and requiring the PIN/password to unlock. This is additionally secured by the Titan M2 secure element, which makes use of the Weaver API and drastically throttles brute-force unlock attempts. https://grapheneos.org/faq#encryption

          • zerozaku@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Xiaomi has the biggest custom ROM scene out there btw despite them trying their hardest to stop bootloader unlocking. You really don’t need to have a company supporting unlocking to make ROMs for them. If they outright block it then that’s an issue.

            • Killercat103@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Is swiftphone its own thing or did you mean shiftphone? I kinda want the shiftphone 8 myself even if they only ship to neighboring countries of mine.

            • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              All of these are insecure as hell. Linux phones especially https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/linux-phones.html

              Fairphone also really fucked up: They signed their own OS with the publicly available (!) AOSP test signing keys. These guys really don’t know that they’re doing, and I would trust their hardware or software whatsoever. And no, installing a custom ROM doesn’t solve this. Considering how bad their security practices are, we genuinely have to assume that there are security issues with the device firmware as well.

              /e/OS is based on the already insecure LineageOS, and it weakens the security further, so it’s not a good option either.

              None of the options you mentioned can be compared to GrapheneOS. It’s currently the best option if you value your privacy and security. You don’t have to give Google money either, since you can just buy a used device, which is also cheaper and more environmentally friendly. Google also makes repairing their devices pretty easy for consumers and even works with iFixit. Here’s a Mastodon post I recently saw about that: https://social.linux.pizza/@midtsveen/113630773097519792

              • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                An used Pixel, assuming I can find one in my country, still costs four (4) times what I need to shell out for a in-market Lineage compatible phone.

                Theoretical security is cute, but it has to be adjusted to practical feasibility. The most secure computer in the world is useless to you if you can’t boot it up.

                • Security-wise you’re better off using whatever OS comes with your device than downgrading to LineageOS. At least most smartphone vendors (except for Fairphone) manage to ship their Stock OS with a locked bootloader and somewhat working Verified Boot.

  • Roopappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would anyone load an app from McDonalds? You want to give them elevated access to your most personal data for a few dollars of coupons?

    What are they taking from you that’s worth more than the discounts they are giving you? Because they are definitely making a profit, or they wouldn’t be doing it.

    • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to work hosting Focus Groups, we would pay cash, and top dollar for even small chunks of specific data sets on demographics that would age very quickly. Since people’s habits change, different trends, feedback, etc. Hence the need of constant campaigns. Today, people give a lot of this data away, for free, in a constant data stream, for months if not years on end for cents or even a couple of bucks a month. Via constant tracking and profiling. It’s crazy how privacy illiterate people are.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      We are definitely in the era where people think discounts before user privacy. I bet most of people downloading the Mcdonald app do it exactly because of cheeper prices and easy of access.

      • dharmik@linuxusers.in
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        just had medium fries and coke. i and many i know use the mc D app because of the discounts it gives when i order through my app.

      • dharmik@linuxusers.in
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        just had medium fries and coke. i and many i know use the mc D app because of the discounts it gives when i order through my app.

      • dharmik@linuxusers.in
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        just had medium fries and coke. many people i know, including myself, use the mcd app because of the discounts it offers when ordering through the app. however, i am under the impression that since i use an ios device and have the option to decline being tracked by the app—which i very eagerly press “no” to—i am on the safe side. am i?

        • pound_heap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apple does extensive audit of mobile apps, including limitations of tracking. So the app cannot spy on something you are not letting it to know. But you are giving it a bunch of info voluntarily.

          I’d say using that app on iOS is similar to making a food delivery order using a loyalty member ID. Basically, you are letting the company (McDonald’s) know who you are, what is your phone number, where do you live, and what do you like to eat. And if they wish to, they could use all that to purchase your profile from a data brocker. Or they can sell that info for a few cents to make up on that discount.

      • dharmik@linuxusers.in
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        just had medium fries and coke. i and many i know use the mc D app because of the discounts it gives when i order through my app.

  • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck both of these companies. Never used McDicks app in the first place. Spyware bullshit.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry but it seems I might have been mistaken by calling out Uber on this one. Thought i read about Uber during this but I cant find back to it. Have changed the title.

    • Wilmo Bones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right people who install various apps like McDonalds apps etc, are these even typical to GrapheneOS users? I’d think most would avoid superfluous data stealing apps.

      • HereIAm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been thinking of switching the GrapheneOS. I certainly enjoy my privacy, and are taking steps to move to sources that don’t harvest my data. Outside of YouTube and android I’ve completely degoogled myself, even replaced Maps with magic earth and OsmAnd. I even swapped full time to linux a handful of months ago as a gamer with a VR interest. But I’m not so hardcore to not use any service that might sell my data. I still use vanilla firefox, food ordering apps, and discord for example. So while I’m not someone who goes to extreme lengths to protect my data, moving over to GrapheneOS doesn’t seem like a huge inconvenience compared to the gains you get.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What do you mean webapp? Isn’t the app that you install a webapp? And isn’t a website not an app because you dont install it?

      • seang96@spgrn.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        PWA - Portable Web App, Apple was going to make this the primary way to run apps but then decided an app store and private stuff was more profit and their support for it tends to be on the suckier side, but has gotten better over the years. You install a PWA in your browser by either “Install” or “Add to home screen” or something like that depending on browser and device being used.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apparently not. I guess some apps you install in the browser. Which is an important distinction, if they’re using the word correctly

          • bitwolf@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes both are PWA capable. However I stand corrected. The McDonalds webapp now redirects you to the play store when you try to order.

            Guess they don’t want me as a customer. (Not that I’d eat McDonalds anyway).

            riders.uber.com is fully functional though, I use it often

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If a business makes it too difficult to use them I just use someone else. I’m sure they understand that but are making a killing at the expense of other people.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There will come a day when there are no alternatives. Ive hit this in many places (EU banks, dating sites, etc)

  • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Banks seem to be hit or miss, happy that mine works. Would rather switch Banks than use a stock Rom, though.

    All the Uber stuff works in Browser, both eats and their fake taxi stuff.

    Not having a subtle reminder to eat at McDonald’s is probably better for you.

    Honestly, if your app could be a website, and includes services not on your website, fuck you, I’m gonna go to the competition.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh yeah that’s an insta-ban. And even the waydroid app devs say their security is atrocious and you shouldn’t use it for banking.