I’ll go first.

3 options

  • Going back to 1964 to watch the Duke Ellington’s Montreal show. Try to meet the man and the musicians. Hang around my city.
  • Go in the end of the 70s to meet my parents before they had kids. Grab a couple of beers and party with my young adults parents. See my uncles, etc. in their young time
  • Going to 1881 during the couple of days when Nietzsche wrote Zarathoustra. I want to discuss with guy even if he is supposed to be writing all day long. No consequence right.

What are yours?

  • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I would go back to when this post had no comments and be the first so I can explain to everyone else what no consequence means. That way when I come back to the present I can still be disappointed by half of the answers in this thread.

  • Eiri@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Find out a burning question that paleontologists have but can’t find an answer to and tell them where to look.

  • Tazerface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Is it possible to travel to the past without changing the timeline? Even going to a diner for a meal will make a ripple.

    • Eiri@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If you assume that your visit creates a different timeline than the one you’re coming back to, sure.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Put a large bet on Leicester City to win the Premier League.

    The odds were 5000-1, and the last person standing cashed out their £50 stake at £75000. I’d have put £500 on for an initial £2.5m, maybe an accumulator on the top 4 to double it, and live a comfortable life off of the winnings.

    • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Good luck with the bookies paying out. Had betway refuse to pay out a £500 bet once. Deleted my account with them shortly after.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Killjoy: If there are no consequences there can be no memory of the event either. Our own future (from the time of returning from the past) would almost certainly diverge from the path of no knowledge otherwise, and that would be a consequence.

    As such, every one of us might already have this ability, we just don’t remember doing it.

    • Eiri@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think they meant no influence on the target timeline, not that you’d forget about the event.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If there were no consequences, I can think of a few different things I’d wanna see.

    1. Just out of morbid curiosity, what an atomic bomb dropping looks like when it explodes, being there in person rather than just seeing footage (from a safe distance with protective equipment, just in case I can still get hurt, otherwise get as close as possible if there are absolutely zero consequences to my actions, as if I’m a spectator in minecr*ft).
    2. Probably just go back in time and watch as many cartoons as I could back in the early netflix streaming era because I absolutely love cartoons.
    3. Definitely go back in time and watch either An American Tail or Fivel Goes West in theaters because I really like both movies.
  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    (Assuming that “no consequence” also means that I won’t die on the trip…)

    • Witness the Tunguska impact.

    • See a Beatles show when they were just some small time dudes playing in a crummy club.

    • Visit the Great Exhibition of 1851 and go inside the Crystal Palace

  • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I would prefer to go back in time literally 24 hours and HAVE consequences.

    I would not eat the food that likely gave me food poisoning.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago
    • Going back to slavery and beat some slave masters
    • Meet my mom when she was younger, maybe in high school. Tell her that she seems like a lovely young lady and very smart. I don’t think she heard that enough.
    • Go back to the first day I got my first cat.
    • I would like to see a royal party of some kind.
    • Go to a Shakespeare play while he was still alive. *Go back to where my grandma alleges she met Bill Cosby to confirm if it’s true, and, if so, punch him because apperently he was rude as hell.
  • randomcruft@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’d go back to “old enough to understand but still young enough to do something about it” me and have a nice long conversation 🙂

      • randomcruft@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        fair, but I’d argue no one can go back in time with out any consequences. even OPs first bullet could have consequences through “meet the man and musicians”. did we not learn anything from Back To The Future 😀