• P00ptart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ugh, this is something my FB friends need to see, but I can’t post to FB because they’re touchy.

  • meiti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s not only Jesus, but it’s religious figures too. Muslims do the same to depictions of their saints, they should always look like “us”.

    • Sundial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Majority of Muslims actively avoid portrayals of religious figures. They would rather have the persons head glowing or something like that to avoid misrepresentation.

      • meiti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes, despite that there are pictures from saints (imams) and paintings at least in Iran, which are purely imaginary and look like Iranians.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Or hear me out, most depictions are from the renaissance when “Not being white” was a relatively new concept to Painters?

    • NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      This is a pretty flawed understanding of history.

      Humans have always travelled, in Europe even serfs would hope to go on pilgrimage and Lords generally had to allow it. Although it may only be to a nearby cathedral. Italy was a trade hub, and a relatively short trip by boat to north Africa.

      European painters knew that people came in different shades. As proof, go look at the school of Athens painting.

      • nutomic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        The average peasant in medieval Europe would certainly never see an African person in his lifetime.

        • NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Across all of Europe and all of the middle ages? Sure probably. Never hear of them, see them in art? I dunno, it’s hard to say because we don’t have a lot of documentation on what normal people’s lives were like.

          In the cosmopolitan cities like Prague you probably would. Also any major Mediterranean trade port. Anyone who went on pilgrimage to those places, or along them, probably would. Cutting off Jerusalem to pilgrimage being such a big political deal indicates that many people went there or wanted to, and people loved sharing stories of places.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Are you trying to say any historical event involving white people is racist in and of itself (As opposed to it merely being limited to the tragically high amount of ones directly linked to the exploitation of minorities) or that you are racist and believe renaissance era artwork to be proof of white racial superiority? Which brand of idiocy am I dealing with?

        • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Demand fuels supply. Art style reflects a population. It’s not hard to guess where the Renaissance is hinting at when everything is ripped white dudes.

          https://asu.pressbooks.pub/race-in-the-european-renaissance-classroom-guide/chapter/teaching-race-in-renaissance-italy/

          Race as a concept and part of Renaissance life, however, has not been a central conversation in scholarship on Italy. This has made it difficult [189] for instructors to know where to start if they do want to bring the subject of race to the classroom. But the primary sources are brimming with racialized references: Petrarch extolled a white beauty, Dante condemned Mohammed to Hell, and Ariosto and Tasso both marshaled crusading themes and deified the violent expeditions of Christopher Columbus in their respective epics (and Tasso borrowed from the Aethiopica to create his heroine Clorinda, a white woman born to Black Ethiopian royalty). Racialized narratives around non-Italians, especially Muslims, Jews, and Black Africans, as well as the violent oppression of ethnic and religious minorities throughout the city-states, influenced this cultural production, and are important parts of Italian Renaissance history.

          • el_abuelo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Are there a plethora of examples of black artwork depicting ripped white dudes? Or are we just saying that White Racism existed in a vacuum?

            • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              I was thinking the same. It’s white people painting for rich white people, why would they EVER even think about the color of his skin? The right color is the color of whoever is paying you to paint it.

    • finestnothing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Jesus is white and ripped because of several very prominent renaissance painters using their hot twink lovers as their models

  • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Jesus became white when Christianity spread in Europe and became a European religion. Earlier Jesus paintings had him a few shades darker. Palestinians are still light skinned and the dark skin is mostly acquired from working in the field.

    • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Jesus is depicted as black in the Ethiopian Orthodox church and is shown as Japanese in some Japanese Orthodox churches.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      There is.

      Of course search engines are all shitted up with the TV show and ai slop.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Jesus is like a Marvel superhero. Like any pop culture fiction, it’s rendition changes to reflect and is a product of the era of that particular iteration of the superhero. You even have the religious offspring sect equivalents of Invincible and The Boys.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Was going to say… there’s no shortage of art - historical or modern - that portrays Jesus as the dominant regional ethnicity.

      Case in point

      A theory that claims multiple leaders – from Jesus to Barack Obama – are actually Turkish and that modern nations are little more than portions of a greater Turkic whole is gaining traction in many countries

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Because he was drawn by Europeans

    Just like Black/Yellow Jesus existing in those populations

    You ask someone to draw a person, they will likely draw someone resembling people they see. If you tell an artist a thousand years ago “from the middle east” they will say what’s that

    Then you just propagate those depictions

        • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Lol, its not that I didn’t understand or that I missed it. It’s that I disagree that its a cogent reason.

          When I was young, I used to draw pictures of people with stick bodies and round heads. They were also often bright or powder pink in colour. I propagated the shit out of that too.

          Then, when I found out that wasn’t the correct way to draw people or the natural colour of human skin, I stopped drawing them and colouring quite so comedically ridiculous.

          Why can’t the people who draw Jesus manage this?

          • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            The comparison with your own childish vs adult drawings is simply off the mark. A more similar comparison could be provided by how artists depict the Vikings. It is well known today that the helmet with bull horns is made-up, and was probably never used by actual Vikings. Yet tons of people still portray them with such helmets, and most non-artists still have that same association in their minds. Why? Because a child growing up and developing their observational and artistic skills is not the same as a culture with its century-old symbols and images.

            Admittedly the depictions of Jesus in art today are frequently done by more or less amateurish artists and are meant to be traditional in their style, which additionally makes them less likely to move away from the inherited imagery.

            • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Your viking analogy is bizzare. Not that many people know that vikings didn’t actually wear anything like that in battle, unlike how everyone knows Jesus was a homeless middle Eastern man and, depsite this, continue to draw him as northern European. More so, vikings are known for wearing those helmets. Jesus isn’t known for being a white man. Why? Because Jesus wasn’t white man and isn’t know for it.

              Youre really starting from where you want to end up and working your way back. Theres no cogent justification for it, as much I enjoy people trying to sell me an appeal to tradition, with extra steps.

  • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Imma be a total dweeb and give the correct answer. Jesus is just Josh in Greek. There’s many meticulous Roman records about messianic rebels in Judea, not a single Josh among them. One possible interpretation would be that the Romans were so invested I’m erasing Jesus from history, they removed the Joshes, but Christianity was a NON-factor before 77AD, so doubtful Roman clerks were furiously burning records to cover up a messianic figure nobody would give a shit about for a century.

    The earliest 1st century CE images have Jesus portrayed like a little Harry Potter of indeterminate race, which seems weird since he’s supposed to be 30, but maybe it’s a Michael J Fox situation, where he points his magic wand at images of the miracles (like loaves and fishes) but it’s more likely he never existed (thus the absence of that Josh in the meticulous records).

    Rome around this time was religiously divided between an ostensible state religion of the Roman pantheon we all know and love and various “cults” such as The Cult of Saint John, which predates Christianity – you can think of his appearance in Christianity like how Munch from Homicide: Life on The Streets carried over to Law & Order: SVU. Other cults were influential among various groups – Cult of Isis and Osiris was for the nerds, Mithraism was for the jocks, Cult of Cybele was for the ladies.

    Constantine, when he came to power, desperately wanted to reboot the Roman state religion with more of that slick theocratic energy they saw in Judea, so he decided the answer was scrapbooking: He’d call the religion Christianity, but Jesus would be sexy Apollo, and God would be bearded Zeus, both of Greco-Roman imagery. The marriage ceremony would come from Isis and Osiris, and they shoehorn in mother imagery from Cybele and Skandamata, creating Mary iconography. Throw in a dash of baptism from John the Baptist and Mitraism’s bath in bull’s blood, and voila! Christianity as we know it.

    So the tl;dr is that’s not your Jesus, that’s Sexy Apollo with a Jesus skin mod, and there never was a historical Jesus, he never existed

      • flora_explora@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        The non-historicity of Jesus has never had traction in scholarship. Mythicism is rejected by virtually all mainstream scholars of antiquity, and has been considered a fringe theory for more than two centuries. Mythicism is criticized on numerous grounds such as for commonly being advocated by non-experts or poor scholarship, being ideologically driven, its reliance on arguments from silence, lacking positive evidence, the dismissal or distortion of sources, questionable or outdated methodologies, either no explanation or wild explanations of origins of Christian belief and early churches, and outdated comparisons with mythology. While rejected by mainstream scholarship, with the rise of the Internet the Christ myth theory has attracted more attention in popular culture, and some of its proponents are associated with atheist activism.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I mean, there probably was a carpenter called Jeshua… But you could probably say the same today.

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        This is why I don’t take it seriously.

        Was there a carpenter turned preacher named Jesus in ancient Judea? Sure why not.

        Was there an accountant turned preacher named Bill in 1940s Alabama? Sure why not.

        It’s such a mundane claim it’s not worth taking seriously.

  • angrystego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Jesus: It’s because I’m not your god. I’m god of the people that colonized your country, took some of your people as slaves and made you all believe in me instead of your original black gods.