• Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Looking over the wikipedia page on this mushroom and all the similar, very edible ones…Yeah I’m never foraging mushrooms.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, I carefully read the description of its distinguishing features, studied the photo, and concluded I have no idea what I’m looking at and how to tell them apart.

      • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m really good at spotting differences or inconsistencies, I’m totally lost with mushrooms though, and I go multiple times every Autumn with a woman in her 70’s. She is very clear about what we are looking for. She throws out at least half of what I gather.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Is the main visual difference just the stem or whatever it’s called being much longer?

      • Risk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        IIRC, the only definitive way to ID mushrooms is by making a spore print - and even then you need to know what you’re doing.

        Just doesn’t seem worth the risk to me.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          nah it’s generally fairly easy to ID mushrooms, the problem is just that if you miss a feature and mistake it for another, you’ll fucking liquidize from the inside out.

          This is the same reason that you never touch something that looks like a carrot plant in the wild, because it could be that one plant that kills you 3 times over.

          I agree that it’s generally not worth the risk though, hence why those who pick mushrooms (which is pretty standard to do here in the nordics) stick to like 5 species who have no dangerous lookalikes and actually taste good and are easy to find.

          Here in sweden 90% of what people pick is chanterelles or boletes, whose entire families look effectively the same and at worst simply don’t taste good. Boletes have ONE slightly toxic species in sweden, and it’s bright red and only grows on one island in the baltic sea.

    • AnarchoCummunist [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      And this is why I grow my own. I’m very fond of Albino Texas PE6. Easy to grow, consistent, and you can clone and agar spawn over and over again. Such an aggressive little strain. And looks very distinct. Unmistakable.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Those don’t have very good reputations among growers. Bunch of crap you don’t need, and the stuff you do need is garbage quality.

        • AnarchoCummunist [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          In my experience, they are quite poor in producing anything worthwhile. Look up the Uncle Ben’s Tek. 90 minute mycology or The Rookie Mycologist have great guides for this, and they’re easy to follow. I’ve gotten amazing results so far.