• wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    …and that load is being used to build / maintain infrastructure, right?

    Right?!

    • frazorth@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      A private company getting private investment? I would expect that there are plenty of string attached to improve, otherwise it’ll be nationalised and the investors will lose their money.

      If not, then it’s just a slight delay for 6 months until they run out of cash again.

  • XIIIesq@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    UK taxpayer is now liable for Thames Water’s £12bn debt.

    How the fuck did we end up with a system that allows so called “investors” to not just pick our pockets, but the pockets of people that haven’t even been born yet?

    All this to allow Thames to survive for at least one year.

    Thames needs to be allowed to fail and investors need to take the hit, not the bill payer.

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Not someone I agree with on much, but Jacob Rees-Mogg said that Thames Water should just be allowed to go under and then the market can sort itself out.

      People are not going to be without water, after all.

    • tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Loading it up with debt is an intentional strategy as you point out you can’t not let an essential service disappear so you either have to nationalise it or bail it out with taxpayer money.

      You gain money to pay dividends, you make money on the interest, and then you make money when the company finally goes bust and has to be bailed out and the loan is refinanced.