• fl42v@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The sources are released under a source-available license, you are legally prohibited from reading them

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s a bit unfair. You can actually buy a flying car today. A few companies recently got their vehicle fully certified and are doing commercial sales. It’s not cheap. If you can’t afford a second Ferrari don’t bother.

      The future is already here, it’s just not evenly distributed.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah it’s called a helicopter.

        Most of the extremely wealthy use then to avoid traffic and occasionally die in them cause flying is more complicated than SciFi made it seem.

        Look at the mansions and companies that all include landing pads. They aren’t just for die hard movies.

        • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          And the modern replacement for the helicopter is the eVTOL. That one is also often called a flying car, although they’re not street legal. As far as I know nobody died in an eVTOL yet.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Right but none are what the past thought of. None of these are cars or street legal really in any way.

            Also it’s cheating to say no one has died in them if nobody is really flying around them. There have been crashes but like a really limited sample size.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What, you’re saying that the sky is owned by democrats now? Give sources, cause my sky is Republican Red! /S

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        (Infuriating TikTok voice:) “These red states are putting atmospheric additives in their coal plants to turn the sky red! Wow!”

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Guilty. Show me the almanac. I don’t trust nobody on the internet. Everybody speaks like they’re an expert.

  • kyub@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Winter is on its way out due to climate change. In around the year 2100, it’s estimated that there will only be 3 seasons left, no winter. And summer will be much longer and much hotter. So the 3 seasons will be spring, then a 2-season long summer basically, then fall. That’s it.

    But you can already see the disappearance of winter today because there’s much less snow and it’s much warmer than like 30 years ago. (Speaking for Germany)

    • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      nah, we still have winter. i know this because it still gets dark.

      we’ll still have four seasons: summer, hellfire, second summer, moist dark.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      then a 2-season long summer basically, then fall. That’s it.

      Like in the tropics, dry season and rain season. Or drought and flooding season of we’re unlucky.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I grew up in Ohio in the 1970s (which was admittedly a rough decade as far as cold weather was concerned). Generally, the first snowfall was some time in September and at some point in October the ground would be completely covered in snow and you wouldn’t see grass again until April. The snow wasn’t completely gone until May. So essentially it was six months of Winter, three months of Summer and a month and a half each for Spring and Fall. It is certainly not anything like that any more.

    • abcd@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      30 years ago we definitely had snow in winter. Sometimes more, sometimes less. But I remember playing in snow basically every winter as a kid. And I’m living in a very mild region of Germany. Now I’m considering all season tires (just for legal purposes) to not change wheels twice a year, since there is maybe some snow for one week in total.

      Spoke with a guy this week who was born in the 30s. He said winter back then was much harder. Whole lakes or even rivers were frozen solid. I can’t imagine being able to walk to the other side of a major river…

      • TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I remember ice-skating every winter as a kid. Rivers were frozen over solid, too. Sometimes, there were two separate layers of ice on top of each other, each being several cm thick. It kind of went away in the late 90s. I guess everybody just thought the ice and snow would return someday. Now even snow has gotten really, really rare where I live.

  • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I literally had to cite the page number from the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 Public Law 117-328 that covered how the $800M that Trump keeps telling everyone FEMA spent on migrants was a completely different fund than the disaster relief fund that FEMA uses for hurricanes. Which the DRF was established originally as it’s own fund in the Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988 Public Law 100-707

    It’s page 4,730 where that item is located for anyone wondering.

    I fucking hate what online interactions have become. I think I’ve easily read over 200,000 pages of government legislation, federal regulation, and legal proceedings since June because of the lies one orange shit stain keeps telling. I really do hope that the Republicans can move past that fucker, it was a lot easier to talk politics.

    • dubious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      what do any of us do when logical, good faith arguments fail and the future of the world depends on convincing idiots that the sky is blue? serious question.

      • daltotron@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Use illogical, bad faith arguments to trick them into believing that the sky is blue, of course. People fall for horrible stupid dumb propaganda, it’s the nature of humanity. Only like 5% of people are really gonna bother to go actually read studies and shit, I don’t even really do that, I just look at the abstracts and then hope that the scientists didn’t fuck up and run the study wrong or engage in p-hacking or something. I couldn’t afford to go to college and take a statistics course, and my only form of education beyond that is watching 3brown1blue videos at 2x speed interspersed with useless escapist brainrot.

        Everyone wants to believe that humans are some highly logical computer creatures that can just be convinced if we get hit with enough rigorous logical argumentation. We’re really not. You can make something much more convincing to someone if you validate their ego, or if you incentivize someone into believing a certain kind of truth as a result of their survival in a certain context, right. Even if we were purely logical beings, that wouldn’t even really solve the problem, because we’re all exposed to vastly different information landscapes, i.e. every MAGA guy you run into has probably be tweaking out to AM radio for 8 contiguous hours at their job, or socializing with a bunch of insularly sexist, homophobic, or racist good old boys in an echo chamber for most hours of the day, or whatever else, right. So, what hope can you have to change their minds over the course of a 1 or 2 hour conversation? If even that. And double this for everyone out there that spends their time listening to NPR, or has milder takes about things, or even just spends their time passively absorbing whatever propaganda floats at them through pop culture and escapist media consumption.

        • dubious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          but those that aren’t receptive are literally the problem. american politics has been a 60/40 split with unequal representation for decades. the gears of government are locked in a bitter struggle where not enough is getting done and the problems keep piling up.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Focus on “joy” and hope you are rich enough to feel really good about life until it all blows up?

            That seems to be the stance of the younger and the wealthier left, and you can see the nightmare self hatred that is already causing if you aren’t.

            • dubious@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              i can’t tell if this is supposed to be sarcasm or not but this is godawful moral advice.

              “stay comfy and forget about it if you can”

              do we or do we not have an obligation to be stewards of the earth? obviously the decision is a personal one. i guess i’ve decided with my post existential thoughts that we do, and that if you don’t agree with me, i don’t want you on my team. or the planet for that matter.

              • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Its pretty godawful advice.

                But it’s advice I do see going around and people taking seriously.

    • Maeve@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I remember when one conservative parent was absolutely furious with GW Bush over invading Iraq. Then they were all in MAGA for nine years. They’ve finally disavowed that one, but I don’t know how much time they have to come further left, or how the trajectory may shift. We actually had a pleasant few days together, with each of us clenching our teeth and walking away a few times, but that’s any relationship. Some things we (everyone) feel strongly about really aren’t worth that argument. In fact, a lot of them.

    • abbenm@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I bet they saw the source and said “oh, yes, thank you for the source, I have updated my opinion based on this new information.”

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because they want to exhaust the person engaging in a good faith discussion. It’s far more labor intensive to have to look for, find, verify for contextual correctness, quote and link said sources, then argue why one’s position is factually correct.

      And all the other person has to do is cite some patently false bullshit in 5 seconds and disregard the argument.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Aka, “Why Don’t You Respond to Criticism?”

        It all boils down to bad faith. They don’t care what argument you make, you’ll never sway them. They’re not interested in the debate with you as much as as they are just getting their bullshit out there for randos to read. Like you say, while you’re finding sources and making sure everyone agrees on terminology they’ve already said 3 more things that are completely wrong.

  • Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The one on the right is a bearded 8 year old who never saw snow. He has a beard due to micro plastics. He thinks all pictures online of snow are AI generated. He’s also an asshole to everyone and rightfully so because his life and planet has been doomed. Welcome to 2034.

    • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same here in Slovenia. 15 years ago we had at least 30cm ofsnow each winter that would stuck around. Now if we even get any snowfall and not just rain it either rains the same day and the snow is gone, or the rain comes a day later and the snow is once again gone.

      • CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        Italiano
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        There must be a way to have winter back. We have to do it for future generations at any cost. I refuse to live in a tropical hell just because some CEOs couldn’t fuck off.

  • Fleur_@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The evil version of this is when people cite a click bait article, you go to the article and read the attached study and the study is not backing up their claims in any meaningful way. Like come on bro you clearly haven’t read this study don’t cite it and claim I need to educate myself.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Average YouTube influencer for me.

      It’s gotten even worse in the past year. Most of them sound like they’re parroting AI summaries of blog posts and sprinkling stupid ass cutaway gags to memes. Like rather than actually consuming the entire body of context around a subject and having an informed take, they’re just giving shadow thoughts and trying to monetize.

      Any YouTuber whose whole angle is to spicy commentary on current events in tech/programming is definitely part of the trash heap.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Do you have a source?” means, “I already know you are wrong but you won’t believe me unless you find out for yourself.”