• Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Wait wait wait, hold your horses. Do you mean to tell me, that the oil industry doesn’t care for this protest, or any protest for that matter? I’m shocked! Shocked, I tell you. It’s almost as if this protest wasn’t meant to impress the oil exec-types…

  • Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    They’re going to be fucking annoyed when they’re told there’s no oil there.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    "They are sensitive and they are completely covered in prehistoric markings which remain to be fully studied and any surface damage to the stones is hugely concerning.

    “A rich garden of life has grow on the megaliths, an exceptional lichen garden has grown. So it’s potentially quite concerning.”

    This is important - they aren’t just a bunch of old rocks, they develop a “varnish” and an ecosystem that can protect them.

    They say it’s just cornflour and will wash off in the rain but people tend not to coat ancient monuments in cornflour, so we don’t really know what the effect might be.

    • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      "They are sensitive and they are completely covered in prehistoric markings which remain to be fully studied and any surface damage to the stones is hugely concerning.

      Bullshit. There is next to no other historic site that has been studied in greater detail. If no scientist up until now has created a detailed map of what is to find on those stones, then frankly, it’s their own fault.

      If anything, they should be concerned about acidic rain caused by air pollution. But you don’t hear much about that, now do you?

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        they should be concerned about acidic rain caused by air pollution. But you don’t hear much about that, now do you?

        +10 billion Internet points to this man

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah. There’s absolutely no way that they have not yet fully digitalized whatever is on them. And if they didn’t, then they’re huge fucking morons.

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hard disagree. As far as I’m aware, everything they’ve done so far is attention-grabbing and harmless. All the paintings were behind glass, and the stuff here is water soluble.

    • rah@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      other climate activist groups

      What other climate activist groups?

      • steeznson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Extinction Rebellion would be the famous example of a group that has publically distanced themselves from JSO’s methods. They believe in protest but simultaneously are wary of alienating people by taking their stunts too far.

        Actually I had a friend from uni who was in XR and he helped organise a protest at Canning Town tube station where they clambered ontop of the train in rush hour to try to stop it. He was saying later that he thought they probably made a bad call picking that specific part of the city.

    • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      How? Is your support for not going extinct really contingent on your personal feelings about a particular activist group?

      • steeznson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I disagree with their evaluation of the magnitude of climate change catastrophe affecting our lives. There isn’t going to be a Day After Tomorrow “extinction event”. Instead climate change is more insidious and will initially affect people who do not live in the West (as it is already doing). We are going to have global crises due to climate change but it’s not going to be on the same level as, say, a Mutually Assured Destruction scenario with nuclear weapons.

        They have also failed to convince the majority of the rest of the public that it will be an ‘extinction event’. Since democracy has not got the result they want they are pursuing anti-democratic means of forcing their agenda onto news segments with stunts that poison the well for other - less extreme - climate change activists.

        • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Disagree with their assessment all you like, but it’s ridiculous to say a protest, especially a non-violent one, is anti-democratic. Democracy does not end at the ballot box, especially in a representative one.

  • kralk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The Tories want to destroy Stonehenge to build a motorway so let’s not pretend it’s sacrosanct now

  • blackluster117@possumpat.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t it come out a while back that Just Stop Oil is actually bankrolled by some oil company and is essentially meant to create a false narrative against actual climate protestors? Am I misremembering?

    • theo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They are funded by an organisation called Climate Organisation Fund of which is funded by someone called Aileen Getty who’s family own Getty Oil.

      Whether or not they are wanting to create a false narrative is questionable. I personally don’t think so, but who knows…

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Some rich person who doesn’t like her family getting their money from oil and is trying to do something good instead is one if the people funding them afaik

    • Flax@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’re mostly toffs. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s a conservative movement to make climate change protesters look bad

  • rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Prime Minister Rishi Sunak condemned the incident as a “disgraceful act of vandalism”.

    Not as disgraceful as awarding oil drilling licenses to companies your family is invested in.

    Leader of the Labour Party Sir Keir Starmer said the damage

    There is no damage: ‘Just Stop Oil said the orange powder paint was cornflour and it would “wash away with rain”.’

    was “outrageous”

    Not as outrageous as forcefully replacing local Labour candidates with your own choices.

    and described Just Stop Oil as “pathetic”

    Not as pathetic as Labour’s climate policies.

    • Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Did any of them comment on the reason for the protest, or just the act itself? I don’t want to see things like stonehenge or priceless art getting fucked up, but I am OK with more things being fucked up if that is what it takes… I’m fully expecting environmental extremism to become a thing in the next few years, as the situation will get worse and these sort of protests haven’t achieved anything.

        • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          How many people do you know that were pro actual environment saving acts before and are now against?

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            None, but that’s also true in the other direction and those people are now more resolute.

            • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              They were never gonna do anything that doesn’t directly and immediately benefit themselves anyways.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Did any of them comment on the reason for the protest, or just the act itself?

        Pro-tip: if you have questions raised by an article’s headlines, read the article.

        “Just Stop Oil said the motivation behind the incident was to demand the next UK government end the extraction and burning of oil, gas and coal by 2030.”

        • Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Pro Tip: Don’t be a cunt. Perhaps my wording was ambiguous, I am aware of the reason for the protest and the content of the article, my point is that the politicians have not commented on the reasons and deflected the topic to the protest itself.

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            So it didn’t work as a form of protest. Don’t give your opponent such an easy win.

          • rah@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It depends on which “them” is being referred to in OP’s comment. Assuming “them” are the protesters, then the answer provides what the protesters said, or at least what the organisation they represented said.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Assuming “them” are the protesters

              Why would you assume that? It was obviously asking about what comment the politicians have made, from the fact that they were asking about whether “they” had commented “on the reason for the protest, or just the act”.

              • rah@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                It was obviously asking about what comment the politicians have made

                Why would you assume that? It was obviously asking about what comment the protesters have made, from the fact that they were asking about whether “they” had commented “on the reason for the protest, or just the act”.

                • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Yes, it’s very easy to make a bad faith argument if you just randomly pull quotes, rather than actually looking at context.

        • steeznson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I just downvoted your comment.

          FAQ What does this mean?

          The amount of karma (points) on your comment and Reddit account has decreased by one. Why did you do this?

          There are several reasons I may deem a comment to be unworthy of positive or neutral karma. These include, but are not limited to:

          Rudeness towards other Redditors,
          
          Spreading incorrect information,
          
          Sarcasm not correctly flagged with a /s.
          

          Am I banned from the Reddit?

          No - not yet. But you should refrain from making comments like this in the future. Otherwise I will be forced to issue an additional downvote, which may put your commenting and posting privileges in jeopardy. I don’t believe my comment deserved a downvote. Can you un-downvote it?

          Sure, mistakes happen. But only in exceedingly rare circumstances will I undo a downvote. If you would like to issue an appeal, shoot me a private message explaining what I got wrong. I tend to respond to Reddit PMs within several minutes. Do note, however, that over 99.9% of downvote appeals are rejected, and yours is likely no exception. How can I prevent this from happening in the future?

          Accept the downvote and move on. But learn from this mistake: your behavior will not be tolerated on Reddit.com. I will continue to issue downvotes until you improve your conduct. Remember: Reddit is privilege, not a right.

  • Dendr0@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Because defacing an ancient site has a clear connection to the environment… bunch of fucking self-centered attention-whores.

    • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Because defacing an ancient site has a clear connection to the environment… bunch of fucking self-centered attention-whores.

      Just Stop Oil said the orange powder paint was cornflour and it would “wash away with rain”.

      I wonder how many of your strong opinions are based on things that you don’t even bother to investigate beyond your first impression.

    • araneae@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They are rocks my friend. Rocks. Birds shit on them daily and have for thoudands of years. But go ahead and be mad about the rocks getting cornflower on them. Very good little reactionary Brit.

      Ever play a Civilization game where Stone Henge ends up underwater because of the sea rising? Yeah. Thats all our art. All our society.

      One thousand shits on Mona Lisa for one saved human life. But we will choose to protect the symbols of capital and status quo.

      Enjoying the Gulf Stream collapsing further this summer?

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Any publicity is good publicity, it’s paint, it can be cleaned up. But drilling for fossil fuels, burning shit to get energy, etc. That will leave a mark on the planet for generations, it might even kill us in the long enough run.

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Just because you support a cause doesn’t mean you need to support every attention seeking brainrot idiot that uses the cause as an excuse to flaunt their stupidity.

        These people are not helping the environment, they’re playing a silly game for attention without caring about the consequences.

        • rah@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          they’re playing a silly game for attention without caring about the consequences

          They’re playing a silly but very serious game for attention, the same silly game that politicians and corporate PR departments play. And they seem to care a very great deal about the consequences.

    • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s either this or ineffectual protests that get swept under the rug and ignored. You should be happy that their protest is purely cosmetic too.

      Just Stop Oil said the orange powder paint was cornflour and it would “wash away with rain”.

      These dang protesters and their… *flips script* attention seeking! Can’t they just do nothin like the rest of us?

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Defacing random things that don’t have any connect at all to what you’re protesting only makes you look bad.

        Yeah, it got attention. Bad attention.

        • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Let’s be real here. What could climate protesters do that wouldn’t get them bad attention? History has shown: Nothing. There is nothing they could do that wouldn’t get them bad attention. In Germany, they even got cussed out for blocking private jets.
          Face it: The powerful do not fear retaliation from the masses if they vilify climate protesters. The protesterscannot win the PR battle. So all they have left is publicity stunts. And as far as publicity stunts go, plastering stones with water-soluble paint is about as tame as it gets.

          • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            The protesterscannot win the PR battle. So all they have left is publicity stunts.

            Some will likely turn towards eco terrorism within the next years of continued inaction.

            • rah@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              One could argue that Stonehenge is an icon of humanity’s pre-industrial, sustainable origins and as such acts as a reminder of the future that humanity will face after the ecological and civilisational collapse currently underway as a direct result of oil production. And hence Stonehenge is something to do with oil production.

      • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        But why Stonehenge? Why not oil company buildings? I believe oil companies generally have buildings. Large buildings. With their names on them.

          • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Maybe we need to come up with a way to deface oil company buildings that does make headlines

              • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Out of interest. As I’m not a farmer. Do you know how I would go about buying and filling a muck spreader.

                Plus Rishi Sunaks home address would be a totally unrelated useful fact to share.

                • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Do you know how I would go about buying and filling a muck spreader.

                  You can hire one from any number of places, like here. I quite like the side discharge spreader for drive-bys as long as you knew the range.

                  To fill it try a pig farmer as they usually have large ponds of the stuff they want rid of - chicken shit or bull shit are also available for symbolic reasons.

                  Plus Rishi Sunaks home address would be a totally unrelated useful fact to share.

                  His home has already been vandalised as I assume the address is in the electoral register. I was quite surprised they got through security and I assume it’s been tightened up since. Driving a large farm vehicle at the house seems quite a good way to get shot.

        • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Because when a child wants the attention that your not giving, it shits on your kitchen floor so that you have to pay attention.

      • Dendr0@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Were I the “protest type”, I’d be getting awfully creative with what can be done to the infrastructure of the things I was protesting. Big Oil? Would be a shame if the refineries were to suffer malfunctions… or the trucks/ships to suffer constant breakdowns…

        But yeah, instead let’s go fuck with something that has no relation and only serves to piss people off - but not in the way you want them pissed off.

        • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          refinery malfunctions truck/ship breakdowns

          sounds like “how to get prescribed as a terrorist organisation 101”

        • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Would be a shame if the refineries were to suffer malfunctions… or the trucks/ships to suffer constant breakdowns…

          I am surprised that people haven’t taken How to Blow Up a Pipeline (book or film) as more of a guide. I presume, as the climate apocalypse intensifies, protestors might escalate.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        False choice. Those aren’t the only options. We’re in a election season. Get out there and help convince the public to vote for people who will actually make a difference.

        Making noise and demanding things is what children do.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m generally supportive of any and all forms of non-violent protest (by which I mean not harming human life), including these, but let’s not pretend the choice is between “standing around with placards” and “vandalise random artwork & monuments”. Blockading ports exporting coal is an excellent direct protest, or vandalising actual fossil fuel companies’ property in such a way that disrupts their ability to do business. Heck, even the classic “block roads in peak hour” is better than this (just for the love of the gods, don’t disrupt passenger trains or busways).

        Don’t get me wrong, this is still ok, and it’s better than nothing at all, but there are more effective ways to protest.