• beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Same! Check the telemetry line in about:config that still has a value in it though (I forget what it is, just that it had one)

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hey, Laura. Fuck you. Fuck your profits and your corporate greed. Enshit yourself till you close down.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Firefox closing down would be pretty big loss since we’d lose all our serious Chrome/Chromium-based alternatives

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Frankly, I’m surprised it took them so long to say this publicly. For over a year, Mozilla has had a de facto conflict of interest when it came to their stance on advertisements, so take anything they say about their necessity with a huge grain of salt…

    May 2023: Mozilla purchases FakeSpot, a company that sells private data to advertisers. Mozilla keeps selling private data to advertisers to this day.

    June 2024: Mozilla purchases Anonym, an AdTech company.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not everyone?

    Does anyone?

    Good thing we can fork, I guess, but it’s kinda sad to watch a previously good org die

      • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The problem with those sorts of forks is they still require moz to do most of the heavy lifting.

        If Firefox stopped being developed they’d all pretty much freeze in place.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I agree to a point, I think some people would pick up the development. Idk if it’d be librewolf or if someone would fork off that, but if Firefox completely shit the bed I think someone would pick up the mantle a bit. We wouldn’t have nearly the release cadence of firefox though.

      • picnicolas@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Does it support containers and sync settings between installs on multiple systems? If so I’m in without hesitation.

        • muhyb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s basically hardened Firefox, you can do all the same things here too. Alas using it with an account kind of defeats the purpose. However you can use your account once to sync everything.

          • picnicolas@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Thanks. Just set it up on one of my computers. I’ll be doing the rest as time allows. There’s a lot I love about it already, familiar but with better defaults, and including search engines like SearXNG. I hope enough of us can switch and send a message to Mozilla, though that feels very unlikely to stop the enshittification.

            • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              oh they’re full on corpo now it sounds like, which is too bad. They should have gone the proton route and go full non-profit org controlled, but here we are.

    • Devorlon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Does anyone?

      I don’t want to see Mozilla shutdown because Google no longer pays them, or due to the loss of another funding source.

      Diversifying their income sources is a good thing.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Fork, blah, blah, blah.

      When one of these forks doesn’t depend on Mozilla to do all the heavy lifting of security updates and compatibility fixes, then maybe we can talk seriously about forks. But no fork does fuck-all towards the hard part of maintaining a web browser engine. So forks mean nothing.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well, if users don’t the source of the actual work, then none of the forks survive. I don’t know what people think are going to happen.

          Shitting on Mozilla seems to be a competitor sport around here sometimes, and it’s fucking self-defeating. In 5 years, there will only be the Chromium engine, and then Google will shut down the opensource side like they pretty much did with Android. And then we’re truly fucked.

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Technically correct: literally no one does fit the criteria for not everyone.

  • cybermass@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Does this mean they are gonna brick ublock origin and force me to Google’s 3.0 shit? (I forgot the name of it)

    • Vik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Manifest v3? I gather they’re already moving towards this but not in a manner which harms ad blocking

    • d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Very unlikely. They will support new extension API’s (they are already 90%+ compatible with manifest v3) bit Mozilla has committed to maintaining compatibility for the manifest v2 API’s that don’t exist in v3.

      Claims otherwise are FUD.

      • abbenm@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        They also are rolling out a modified version of Manifest V3 that restores the ad blocker capability that Google was disabling.

        • cybermass@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Well y’know what, if the cost of that is some baked in ads on the new tab page I am totally good with that.

          YouTube allows just about any ads on their site, so many recent examples of scams and malicious sites advertising on there.

          • abbenm@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah, I don’t love Manifest V3 adoption, just for what it implies about Google’s ability to push standards it wants. (Is google even pretending it’s not purposely targeting ad blockers with V3?) But if you have to, this is the way to go.

  • o_d [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This feels like the turning point for Firefox that we all feared would come. They’ve now switched to outright gas lighting their users. They’re trying to convince us that if they take a stab at doing ads the right way, that we can have a web filled with tolerable ads that work for both the user and the business.

    Ads and user data collection are the worst part of the internet. Nothing has ever gotten better because of them. And there’s already far too much focus in this area. Mozilla just wants to be another exploiter so that they can have a piece of the stolen value pie.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s probably at least a factor, yeah. They’ve been trying to reduce dependence on Google for a long time, which was always a smash hit with the community (not), but if there’s a very concrete scenario where will stop paying, then the urgency ramps up quickly.

  • Lemmchen@feddit.org
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    But taking on controversial topics because we believe they make the internet better for all of us is a key feature of Mozilla’s history.

    Is it?

    I would rather have a world where Mozilla is actively engaged in creating positive solutions for hard problems, than one where we only critique from the sidelines.

    Maybe your users don’t.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      In addition to your good points:

      a world where Mozilla is actively engaged

      That doesn’t have to mean a world where Firefox itself is involved in this engagement, despite her insistence that it for some reason must be. Firefox is not Mozilla as a whole.