Given this event was one of the supposed major contributors to proscription, does the fact that a jury of the people not wanting to convict them mean the proscription might’ve been a bit overblown?

I’m sure its all in the past now and there aren’t any recent events over the last 2 years where this has happened again.

Absolutely horrifying

a policewoman with severe spinal injuries

Important to note the police officer attempted to brutalise someone.

current justice system relies on everyone being treated the same way

against the law

being held in custody awaiting trial.

Can only be held for 182 days, and we are way past that so the government is breaking the law here.

Ah so the rule of law doesn’t apply and we live in an authoritarian state.

And when 182 days of remand passes what happens?

So are you saying you believe they have been charged?

Also important to note the person this thread is about is not in the article you linked, so can you clarify whether you believe Heba is related to the article you linked?

What crime have they been >charged< for?

discuss your opinions

Are you saying the law on remand is an opinion?

Where did I say they lost? I was explaining why this was related to the government.

General Medical Council probably

It appears to be the official channel now for the american government

Anna Luna is now threatening to sanction Starmer and Britain

https://x.com/RepLuna/status/2009460496668426449/quotes

Good to see the BDS movement picking up enough steam to create this kind of response

I’d never support the Israeli government

But you just said you support the two state solution? Or has this conversation made you realise the ‘israeli’ government is objectively wrong and cannot continue? Are you finally a one stater and want to enact Thawabit?

Your post history seems… inorganic

Can you provide an exact ratio of post history that would avoid this? For every comment I make on world politics should I make 3-4 in a hobby community?

Or is it specifically “Israel” that has this prerequisite? If I exclusively talked about renters rights and mass construction of social housing would you raise the same concern?

Your post history seems… inorganic. It’s very strange to post a few normal comments 2.5 years ago, then 3 months ago start exclusively talking about Israel and nothing else.

What? I joined the fediverse on the first big exodus from reddit and didn’t find anything useful to participate in.

I don’t talk about warhammer because I would just build paint and play it.

I don’t talk about death metal because i’ll just listen to it instead.

Politics is one of the few things where talking about it is the “doing”, so of course its all going to be that.

exclusively talking about Israel

I’m not talking about ‘Israel’. I’m talking about Palestine and the swift movements of the UK government to remove all of our supposed rights as soon as people protest about our country’s complicity in the genocide.

attacking incapacitated people with sledgehammers

Again this line. The police officer attempted to brutalise someone, and they defended themselves.

being against the violence and ethnic cleansing you’re gunning for

Important to note that removing ‘israelis’ from homes is not ethnic cleansing. They are not in their homes, its the Palestinians they have stolen. The same way it wasn’t ethnic cleansing in South Africa in restoring equality like Musk and Trump say.

E: omfg I’m such a moron. A 2.5 year old account that suddenly became active 3 months ago and speaks exclusively about Israel. I’ve spent my morning debating with a bot or a troll.

Some of us take breaks from websites?

and speaks exclusively about Israel

If we are talking about comment history of course you’ve been active in a lot of political threads taking the side of israel. So I’m not sure what this point is meant to make?

I don’t like that Israel was formed either, but they were. That genie is out of the bottle. People have been born there for generations now, it’s not their fault, and they should have self-determination just like anybody else.

No different to Thatchers position on South Africa. The black south african’s being tortured and crippled has happened for too long for anything to change, so we just have to live with it right?

it’s not their fault

Most people in occupied Palestine have chosen to move there, they are precisely at fault and are choosing to be neglectful parents bringing a child into an occupation.

Let’s also not pretend that if Israel and Palestine were united under one banner that things would go well for the minority population.

That is also a zionist position, israel existing and continuing to exist is an admission of wanting the apartheid system to continue and the suffering that exists today to be committed against the next generation. The ‘israelis’ will be fine doing the same thing white south african’s did, move to Perth.

The minority population is also the current one living under apartheid so I’m not sure what your reason would be to say that improving the situation would be not worth doing this idea anyway. Its starting to sound like you don’t actually want the Palestinians lives to ever materially improve, even via minor reforms.

A two state solution is the least bad outcome, and that’s why even Palestine themselves support that outcome.

What we have now is what the two state solution will end up in eventually, so rather than put 2-3 more generations through the same suffering to start again, we can just skip to the part where the white settlers move back to Russia, Lithuania and Brooklyn.

Those groups didn’t cripple an already incapacitated policewoman by hitting them in the back with a sledgehammer.

The police officer chose to brutalise someone, they don’t get to complain when people defend themselves. She could’ve stayed home, but being a police officer demands you be the kind of person to choose cruelty, so what happened is precisely what was always going to happen.

Also important to note the police officer isn’t crippled, just a small detail you need to update.