![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/938ce096-702f-4a4d-87c4-058b8c418ed5.jpeg)
0·
3 months agoNo it’s just R^7 regression! Testosterone levels will be negative by next week!
Edit: and male bodies were approximately 2000% testosterone in the 1940s!
No it’s just R^7 regression! Testosterone levels will be negative by next week!
Edit: and male bodies were approximately 2000% testosterone in the 1940s!
I’ve never really thought about this before, but const volatile
value types don’t really make sense, do they? const volatile
pointers make sense, since const
pointers can point to non-const
values, but const
values are typically placed in read-only memory, in which case the volatile
is kind of meaningless, no?
Because Microsoft cares so much about an 18.6K-member community called “linuxmemes” on a small federated Reddit alternative known for being filled with die-hard Linux fans and furries?