• petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    People should be allowed to smoke and gamble, too.
    I still don’t think it’s good that they do that, though.

    One of the aims of Stop Killing Games, as far as I’m aware, is the preservation of history, which seems like a very odd thing to be indignant about.

    • dudinax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      So you want to legally require game companies to “preserve history” in perpetuity, unlike every other kind of company in existence?

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Are there books in libraries? Yes, and the publishers don’t have to do a thing. And it is good for society. Similarly, can you fix an old car, even if the manufacturer went bankrupt? Of course you can.

        We have precedent, my friend.

        • cryptiod137@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          To fair to that rather silly commenter, Stopkillinggames puts the onus on the publisher while your examples are based on the individuals or other third parties providing the “fix”

          • eRac@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Only if the publisher has taken steps to stop individuals from preserving them through more traditional means.

            • cryptiod137@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              As in, the publisher has stopped them preserving it otherwise, so now the publisher must make it accessible somehow?

    • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It exists partially as that because many great games, for a long while, before widespread internet access, could not be played if they were no longer directly sold without either paying out the nose for a working, used cart or disc, and console… or via emulation, which is apparently basically illegal, in practice, technically, its complicated, etc.

      Then the video game landscape changed with widespread internet access, much more oriented toward what used to be seen as buying a fancy pants board game into well now you’re just buying a ticket to a fancy pants board game that can be revoked at any time, and now you just have an expired ticket to a box that is magically superglued shut and will light on fire if you pry it open.

      Some of us olds still view software as a product, a good, not a service.