Examples include Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion here in the UK.

Personally, I think some charities are groups are genuine in their outburst wanting large firms to stop strangling the natural beauty for profit, however for me there is a red line that can be crossed.

Blocking roads preventing medical care, people going to work, interview and possibly a nice vacation away. This doesn’t really help but make the public look at your group in a bad light.

The same can also be said when attempting to destroy priceless art for a cheap publicity stunt knowing it’ll get clicks on social media.

TLDR - I think some groups are genuinely good whilst others are just shouting in a speakerphone, pissing everyone else off.

What do YOU think?

  • sbv@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    0·
    2 months ago

    The gallery previously said the gold-coloured frame of the glass-covered painting was damaged in the October 2022 attack.

    Apparently the painting was protected by glass. I don’t know the cultural significance of the frame.

    • tobogganablaze@lemmus.orgEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      Either way, I don’t approve of vandalism against random objects as a form of protest. How much damage was caused is is relevant for sentencing, not the principle.