What I have learned:

  • Russia has already won the Ukraine war
  • Which NATO started
  • A lot of people in the West think that Ukraine should surrender
  • Also Ukraine was the world’s main provider of CSAM
  • Also Ukraine is exploited by the West but if they can unite with Russia then their economy and everything else will finally be alright

It’s literally like a bizarro world and everyone is over there agreeing with it. I’m genuinely confused by, who even are these people (what is the mixture of Russian bots / Russian-aligned ordinary people / confused Westerners / some other explanation.)

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    For OP: This above is the Russian talking points light, presented as a reasonable timeline. It glances over so much important stuff.

    Hexbear is a group of useful idiots steered by the Russian MOD. Anything that destabilized their adversaries is good. This als means feeding a wide array of victim blaming, feeding competing narratives and generally making people question if there actually is a truth.

    Shut up about NATO expansion

    • arymandias@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And about the NATO thing, what do you think would happen if Mexico and Canada tried to join a military alliance with China?

      I’m not victim blaming, I’m blaming the US and Russia for playing cynical geopolitical games and destroying a country along the way.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        If Canada or Mexico wanted to make ties with China that’s their perogative.

        America doesn’t get to dictate the affairs of it’s neighbors.

        I wouldn’t dedicate my free time to screeching ‘death to Canada’ and being a dipshit to everyone who doesn’t share a carbon copy of my faulty perspective.

        • Zyratoxx@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ngl the US would react quite pissed just like it reacted during the Cuba crisis.

          Placing nuclear warheads in range of enemy cities is OK, but when the enemy wants to place their nuclear warheads in range of my cities as a reaction it’s a cause for nuclear war.

          And the US has overthrown quite a lot of governments for their own interests (starting with the banana wars and later extending to anti-communism and oil), so toppling the Mexican / Canadian government to get them back on track actually isn’t far fetched.

          But I agree with your last point. Even tho I don’t like the US I’d never make opposing the US at all cost even if I have to side with literal fascists & mass murders my main purpose of life. Out of China, Russia, Iran and the US, the US is the lesser evil (at least for now… Idk what MAGA is up to)

    • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The link you have provided with that title and thumbnail (written “Deal with it”) is no better than the Hexbear or Russian MOD propaganda you are belittling. Sounding cool or assertive while “shutting up” a (main) discussion point will only resonate with the same type of right-wing nationalist people in your own circle, while you are criticizing the same group albeit in another circle.

      I wonder if you ever considered the same adjectives can be applied to you from others’ perspectives at a glance.

      Note: Not implying any stance here on my part. Just pointing out what can be drowning the discussions while everyone points fingers at someone.

    • Sootius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It glances over so much important stuff

      Sure does. Like the 8-year long shelling civilians campaign that Ukraine was undertaking on Donetsk and Luhansk, solely on the basis that it wanted to deny them a vote on their own autonomy.

    • arymandias@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is such destructive rhetoric, everything you disagree with is Russian propaganda. Yes of course Russia is trying to influence western opinion with war propaganda, because that is what countries at war do. But the US has shown so clearly in the past that they can not be trusted to be the single source of truth, because spoiler alert: they are also a country (de facto) at war.

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No, even remotely trying to provide justification for the Russian campaign of terror and atrocities against Ukraine is destructive rhetoric.

        RUSSIA IS THE BAD GUY. No if’s and’s or but’s about it. There was no existential threat to Russia, there was/is no plan to invade Russia, there are no Nazis ruling Ukraine.

        Every day we see in the newspapers new examples of the barbarism the Russians show towards their Ukranian neighbors. Russia steals children, actively targets civilians, civilian infrastructure and even first responders. It armed terrorists with an advanced Anti air system and shot down a passenger airliner… the list of bad guy things is endless.

        And the whole “disagreeing with the narrative because there is more to it” is just propagating Russian talking points and helping them muddy the water. Russia joining NATO would have been the death of nato. And in turn the structure for keeping Russia in check would have been gone.

        All former Soviet states lived under the brutality of Moscow and know first hand that they cannot be trusted. It is good they where believed.

        • arymandias@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The US has done everything you (correctly) accuse Russia of in Iraq, Vietnam, and South America (either directly or via proxies). What does that make the US?

          Imperialist states do imperialist things, the least we can do (coming from a European perspective) is to try to maintain peace by a combination of international law and pragmatic ad hock peace deals where international law is unattainable.