• Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Look, some of us old farts started on Linux back before nano was included by default, and your options for text editing on the command line were either:

      1. vi/vim, a perfectly competent text editor with arcane and unintuitive key combos for commands
      2. emacs, a ludicrously overcomplicated kitchen-sink program that had reasonable text-editing functionality wedged in between the universal woodchuck remote control and the birdcall translation system

      Given those options, most of us chose to learn how to key-chord our way around vim, and old habits die hard.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I refuse to see how vim and emacs is worth learning. I only use it because that’s the only option when editing server files. Beyond this, I couldn’t imagine coding in these environments from scratch.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I only use it because that’s the only option when editing server files.

      suggestion 1: use nano. Unlike vi(m) and emacs, it’s meant for humans, all the command shortcuts you can execute are listed at the bottom.

      suggestion 2: browse the servers in question via your file explorer (sftp://user@server or just sftp://server) of choice or WinSCP if you’re on windows, open whatever file with your local graphical text editor of choice.

    • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      By the way, for editing server files consider nano. It’s also widely available, has simpler shortcuts and displays them on the screen. It’s obviously not powerful like vim, but a good match when you just need to edit a config file.

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nano is just as fiddly as vim and way less powerful when you actually figure out what you’re doing though?

        Ie a completely redundant piece of software that has no place being pre-installed anywhere

  • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    As someone who’s been a software developer for over a decade and in IT even longer, I still don’t use vi/vim for anything other than when crontabs have it set as the editor.

    • Hexarei@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Honestly if you don’t use vim motions in your ide of choice, you’re missing out big time. Being able to do things like “Delete everything inside these parentheses”. di( or “wrap this line and the two lines below r in a pair of {}” ys2j{ , or “swap this parameter with the next one” cxia]a. with a single shortcut is game changing.

      Even just being able to repeat an action a number of times is ridiculously useful. I use relative line numbers, so I can see how many lines away a target is and just go “I need to move down 17 lines” and hit 17j.

      Absolutely insane how much quicker it is too do stuff with vim motions than ctrl-shift-arrows and the like

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Absolutely insane how much quicker it is too do stuff with vim motions than ctrl-shift-arrows and the like

        Those tasks are a very small part of work time, so most people don’t feel the need to optimize it.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Stop showing off VIM to your wife would be a good start. I mean, I would do the same if she tried to show off her make tutorials to me.