BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to Canada@lemmy.ca · 1 month agoHe got double doubled.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageHe got double doubled.lemmy.worldBonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to Canada@lemmy.ca · 1 month agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoYeah, as long as you don’t mind a refresh rate of 5 frames a second…
minus-squareBakedCatboy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoUnless it’s a very weird special order display it’s probably still 60hz, that way the transitions between menu screens and animations look smooth.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoI’d be surprised if anyone manufactures something slower than 30hz at all
minus-squareArxCyberwolf@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoEven the cheapest, most bottom-of-the-barrel LCD monitors from 15 years ago seem to still be 60. Matching the refresh rate to AC cycles per second makes sense.
Yeah, as long as you don’t mind a refresh rate of 5 frames a second…
Unless it’s a very weird special order display it’s probably still 60hz, that way the transitions between menu screens and animations look smooth.
I’d be surprised if anyone manufactures something slower than 30hz at all
Even the cheapest, most bottom-of-the-barrel LCD monitors from 15 years ago seem to still be 60. Matching the refresh rate to AC cycles per second makes sense.