is it too much to ask for some feedback? reddit, locals, coding forums and main stream sites banned or shadow banned me. just for saying this is a new software design pattern , please tell me what you think about it.
I try and I try and I just get banned everywhere. stifled.
anyways this is a summary of the project:
I don’t know about you, but I am not OK with corporate AI!
I am not cool with: an LLM telling me something is inappropriate getting her opinions from corporate news sites adding silly disclaimers censored speech banned words spying on me saving data on some cloud my cup of tea is an offline localized modular AGI.
LivinGrimoire is a software design pattern that lets you absorb powerful skills instantly. Just one line of code per skill.
Need Image Recognition, Speech, Robotics, weather updates, alarms, reminders, or LLMs? Simply add the skill file to the DLC folder. It’s like how Neo learned Kung Fu in The Matrix—the skill is loaded directly into the LivinGrimoire.
Here’s the ultimate simplicity:
To add a skill: One line of code. To toggle it off: Comment that one line out. LivinGrimoire handles the rest: This software design pattern connects the skills, prioritizes algorithms, and queues its tasks on its own.
Initial Set up only includes copy-pasting one directory into your IDE.
It’s fully multi-language, working seamlessly with Java, Kotlin, Swift, C#, C++, Python, VB.NET, and more.
This is the absolute laziest and simplest way to program.
Initial Setup Add the LivinGrimoire core directory (for your chosen language) to the project. Include the main file (recommended loop for the AI think cycle). Create a DLC directory and place the personality file inside. Usage Add skill files to the DLC directory to load them into the AI. Modify the personality file in the DLC directory: Add a skill with a single line of code. Comment out a line to toggle a skill off. Run the main file. Note This is a development kit, not a standalone application. Run it inside your IDE. Refer to the livingrimoire github wiki for additional features and detailed documentation.
Sounds as loosy goosy as soft sci-fi
This doesnt make any sense at all
It’s just more AI garbage. OP is either straight up scamming, or bought into the delusions of the “AI” bubble.
Even when a model is trained on available instructions for a given language or library, they struggle to spit anything out that’s not either a direct reference to an example, or the only possibly coherent thing from a set of instructions likely larger than the code it will generate anyways…
If you dig around AI projects, so many of their readme files or even published documentation are this concept-only, word salad trash indicative of a moron prodding an LLM to do the heavy lifting for them. As if LLMs could even actually reason or think…
It sounds like trash because it is trash.
this is not an LLM(it can absorb LLMs tho with 1 line of code). it is a skill absorber. you can even try it out. I ported it for many PLs for availability. https://github.com/yotamarker/LivinGrimoire/tree/main/livingrimoire start here and there is plenty documentation: https://github.com/yotamarker/LivinGrimoire/wiki
Computers dont have skills. They follow a set of instructions, and thats it. Even if they did have skills, that wouldn’t be regarded as a software design pattern.
the LivinGrimoire is an SDP because:
It defines a clear structure (Brain, Skill, etc.), has a consistent way to add and manage functionality: brain.addSkill(Skill()) or copy paste skill files.
the livingrimoire solves spaghetti code, and code debt, as well as package coding solutions modularly in skills.
And it works across languages(9 PLs).
That’s the textbook definition of a design pattern.
Isn’t this just object-oriented programming with confusing occult names for things?
no, this is the laziest way to code. pick a skill, add it with 1 line of code(or just copy paste the skill file to the DLC dir). devs can package coding solutions and sell them as skills. the livingrimoire does all the rest in the background. prioritize, queue, output and much more
A “skill” is defined as:
an ability that has been acquired by training
What/who am I training when I add a skill?
If only it was as well defined as OOP…
What you’re defining is at best an API for a library that’s clearly attempting to leverage machine learning. It’s like a dumber even more techbro version of MCP… Except you’re not defining an interface, but a basic list.
that’s like saying a car is just a machine with wheels. floccinaucinihilipilification. when it has so many features: auto attachment of skills to the proper brain part(sensory, thinking, output), alg prioritization, queuing, inter skill com, meta data for skill awareness and run time skill toggling, and many more features. and that’s not even counting the Unique skills of this eco system.
I remember you talking about this a long while ago. I tuned out because it made absolutely no sense to me, and trust me, I really tried.
It reminds me of the Temple OS guy.
this is a design pattern by which the user adds any skill/feature/ability to the system with 1 line of code. it has many more features as well. its not fair for you to say it makes no sense without properly articulating the specifics of what makes no sense to you.
Okay, I’ll bite. Can you link me to documentation that defines what a skill/feat/ability is in this context? It’d be helpful if you have some code examples of what this pattern looks like. I’ll take a look again.
https://github.com/yotamarker/LivinGrimoire/wiki a skill is a subclass of the Skill class. https://github.com/yotamarker/LivinGrimoire/wiki/Incantation-0-LivinGrimoire-experiment
If you’re enjoying working on this project, and learning new things, then I’d never want to discourage that. That being said it’s far too esoteric for me, so I’m once again out.
That’s not a pattern. That’s an extremely basic list of required knowledge.
You realize most projects already document what you need to be familiar with? It’s called dependencies.
Get professional help my dude. Not the coding kind, but there psychological kind. Please
It kind of sounds like regular programming using libraries but with fancy names for everything. And nowhere does it seem to explain how anything really works just that it’s super easy somehow.
So you went to all these other places and got shit on and expected what exactly? Take a hint man people don’t like this idea.
tell me you are a paid troll working for big tech without saying it. LMAO
That was funny 🤣. Thanks for the laughs.
I just found this in your buy me a coffee page:
promotion of the livingrimoire AGI software design pattern
If you think that whatever your creation is is a “AGI software pattern”, then it should become obvious why you got banned from everywhere.
Some people are afraid to lose their jobs to a LLM, instead of learning how to use it to their benefit they just use online platforms to complain about it, they will not change anything anyway and they probably lose their jobs to a LLM even faster. They believe the actual state of it will remain always the same but forget it develops faster than what they think. LLMs are tools like a hammer you can smash a steel nail with it or a finger nail. Anyway it is better to not waste time trying to convince people about anything just do whatever is better for you. They will do the same.
