• GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Sure. I won’t move the goalposts too much here, and will accept that I was overly specific,… but I legitimately would describe that as separate from an invasion, and instead call that peacekeeping or something else.

          Invasion to me seems like imperialist action to further political or territorial goals.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You should probably look up what Trujillo got up to, since you admit some actions justify intervention.

            Like, for example, a CIA sponsored coup and assassination. But obviously they’re the good guys, right?

      • RandomVideos@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        But what if a country is invading another country so they will stop invading a country, blocking the attempt by the invaded and invading country to build a revive machine that takes up exactly the same space as it and the invaded country combined to revive hitler?

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The other dude being a douche doesn’t make invasion correct.

          Peacekeeping and diplomatic pressure are different.