• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    A woman has the legitimate choice to go out with a third guy or nobody. We do not have a legitimate choice of anybody but Biden or Trump for president. One of the two will be chosen.

    This meme is stupid and amounts to pro-fascist propaganda.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      youre going to get a lot of hate for stating facts.

      theres a huge contingent here on lemmy who really want fascism to win, so theyre attempting to guilt people into voting for a 3rd party

      • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fascism is already winning. It’s going to win regardless of whether we vote for Trump or Biden. That’s just the reality of it. Vote for whoever the fuck you want. That’s your freedom. Just know that in America, the ruling class will never part with even a shred of their power.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          i hate the dems as useless conservatives, but this ‘BoTh SideS aRe thE SAME’ argument is crap.

          you might as well just say ‘everyone give up, humanity is over’.

          • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s not giving up though; it’s acknowledging a reality and making a decision with that information. The alternative is that we get stuck in this nauseating infinite loop of voting for “the lesser of two evils,” while the working class bicker. Both sides aren’t the same, but they lead to the same outcome—as we’ve seen over and over. This is the trap they have put us in and these are the intended results.

        • Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Giving up and giving in are the same thing to the ruling class. They appreciate your support…not you specifically, but rather the investment they’ve made to make you accept their rule as fate.

          • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s not giving up; it’s acknowledging the reality of the Groundhog Day movie we’re stuck in, and doing what you will with that information. This endless circle of the working class bickering over “the lesser of two evils” every 4 years needs to end.

            • Clent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Sure, as soon as the working class realizes that isn’t the choice. The choice is obvious. People voting for the right, the party for the owner class are being tricked into voting for the same bosses that treat them like shit.

              This prevents the working class people from being elected because the cost of running has been driven up by the right so all we have left are weathly democrats and those that aren’t, those that made the mistake of baretending are ridiculed and the working class who votes right join in the piling.

              They are class traitors and need this both sides narrative to justify being played for the fools they are

  • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The analogy kind of falls apart since she is not limited to this guy and Chad. She’s free to choose nothing at all. With Trump vs Biden, there’s no viable third option, and having no president is not one of the options. So the “Trump is worse” argument becomes viable simply because you do have to choose one of them.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Continue with that analogy. What would happen if that woman had no other option. Should she choose the nice guy, the chad or object to the choice being fostered upon her and choose nobody? And if she’s paired anyway with that person, should she then act as if it was her choice, or take actions to disengage from that person and destroy the system that caused these turn of events?

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        And if she’s paired anyway with that person

        This line right here is where it should be obvious how far this “analogy” has to be twisted to even start to become analogous.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        object to the choice being fostered upon her and choose nobody?

        do you genuinely think not voting will make neither candidate win

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can tactically vote for Biden to avoid Trump and still take actions to dismantle the system.

        • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Or you could maybe take actions to fix the system. Because whatever you lot come up with after dismantling is going be worse for everybody else.

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You can still do both. The only viable path to election reform comes from downballot state elections anyway.

            • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              You can still do both

              Not sure that I follow what you mean. You can’t fix a system that is being dismantled, so I’m guessing that you mean something else.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          So the woman in our scenario should decide to choose the “Nice Guy” tactically?

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I don’t think it does. A choice fostered upon me at the threat of violence is not a choice at all. I refuse to participate and therefore legitimize such a farce.

              • Pennomi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                You’re free to do nothing, but smart people choose to minimize harm when there are only bad choices in front of them.

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Who said I’m “doing nothing”? Voting isn’t doing anything. Only actions outside the ballot matter.

              • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Non-participation is not the same as doing nothing. If she chooses to date neither, neither is in her life. If you do nothing, you still get trump or Biden. The analogy doesn’t hold.

    • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Using the trolley problem as an analogy, if you don’t pull the lever the people run over by it are not your fault but the trolley company’s, but if you do pull the lever the death of the guy on the other tracks is absolutely on you.

      I assume you voted for Biden last election, to avoid the trolley running over the people in that proverbial track. Congratulations, you are guilty of murdering all those Palestinian children. Now, next election, if (when) Trump wins, your vote even for Biden is what gives legitimacy to his presidency.

      • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        After that news on research that a Trump victory would likely spell the end of NATO, don’t be surprised if the rightists starts to see this election as being about ending NATO and withdrawing from the UN.

        Typical right-wing goals that maybe leftists don’t appreciate the strength of conviction that the hard-liners have.

        That (and the obvious social conservative goals) are the only legitimacy that Drumpf really has.

        edit: also, Trump trumped Biden on the Palestenian genocide when he moved the Israeli embassy. i’m sure that that emboldened Netanyahu to press even harder rightwards. Now look at it.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          ending NATO

          But an end to NATO would be an unambiguously good thing. It has literally never fought a defensive war in its history and the places its invaded and bombed are still hurting decades later.

          withdrawing from the UN.

          A UN where the US couldn’t veto a hundred demands for peace in Palestine, backed by threat of sanctions is also an unambiguously good thing.

          If I genuinely believed Trump would bring about a peaceful dismantling of the American Empire, I’d have to campaign for him.