This is true if we ignore monotheism and go with one of the -isms where humanity is god.

You should have bought a squirrel.

Who says drugs can’t be part of self care?

You did it!

The thing you weren’t doing was being uneasy.

Now you can rest easy.

Oops. Too late. Time to be uneasy again.

The actual model required for general purpose likely lies beyond the range of petabytes of memory.

These models are using gigabytes and the trend indicates its exponential. A couple more gigabytes isn’t going to cut it. Layers cannot expand the predictive capabilities without increasing the error. I’m sure a proof of that will be along within in the next few years.

You can definitely have a just a little genocide.

You’re inability to comprehend this lead to more genocide. It doesn’t matter if you can see it or accept it; reality doesn’t need you to understand.

Fine one says “more doom” and the other says “less doom” and you picked more doom because it didn’t quantified how much less.

The point is you picked more doom well. Blaming the signage being inadequate. The sign was clear to anyone that hadn’t shoved their head up their own ass.

Why does the blame go for Harris for not convincing people when it was clear to anyone paying attention that Trump was going to be worse?

This sounds like how people talk after being obviously wrong and not being able to accept being wrong.

If there are two paths and once says “Doom” and the other says nothing, only a fool picks the marked path. Only a fool who cannot accept responsibility blames the unmarked path for not being clearly marked “NOT Doom”

When one person says they are going to do bad shit, it’s not on the other side to convince you they wont also do bad shit. The person assuming the one not talking who to doing bad shit will do it away because reasons is the problem. There is no one to blame but themselves. They will be a tool until they seize their agency and make an informed decision.

Stop being a tool.

Learn to understand search results?

That’s showing results for vendor lock-in.

This is a stupid hill to die on, why are several of you choosing to do so?

None of you have any idea what is required to build and even the simplest electronic product.

Just to be clear here, you made up a term and then claimed I didn’t know that term. And rather than address that you are glad that term doesn’t exist.

Tell me you are a never wrong without telling me you’re a never wrong.

Looks like you’re the one confused here. Supply lock-in means what exactly to you?

This appears to be a term you made up. What is supply lock-in returns no results.

Perhaps you mean vendor lock-in which is actually what I am talking about and you don’t understand what vendor lock-in means.

Tell me you don’t know how the global economy works without telling me you don’t know how the global economy works.

Silly prole. Why would I read about Marxism on how to play the stock market?

Go be a good cog now and create that surplus value for me to extract.

Has he actually said he’d pardon anyone but himself?

I don’t anticipate him doing anything that doesn’t benefit himself based on his previous behavior.

This is the proletariat view of the world.

For anyone who isn’t just a common wage worker and is aware of how markets work, it is very definitely not the case.

A cog in the machine cannot perceive the machine’s changing output.

I think that’s a different discussion.m. We can make excuses all day for how people end up with extreme views. It doesn’t change anything. The reason it occurs is part of human nature, a weakness that one has to choose to overcome on a daily basis or not. Choosing wrong too often and there might be no way back.

I find this most evident in people who suddenly shift right when they end up in some sex scandal, they move towards the group that is most forgiving of such events and lose themselves in the shift. Russel Brand and Musk are two examples.

Knowledge seeking for the sake of knowledge seeking is something totally different. It requires accepting one knows nothing and despite all the knowledge gather now knows less. It requires a humility that can be uncomfortable.

Few end up adding significant new knowledge. Those who do maintain a humbleness as the recognize the efforts who came before them.

Those who pretend become exploiters, it takes little effort to reveal their search was only ever for loopholes. Those people are another form of extremist.

Stupid people don’t know how stupid they are. They reject the very notion. It’s how one stays stupid in a world with all the world’s knowledge at our fingertips.

Turns out access to knowledge was not a threat to the leaders in history. The very idea they were concerns may be oversold.

If you don’t like being called out for a both sides argument, doubling down on the both sides argument isn’t going to progress the conversation.

It only serves to illustrate your lack of intelligence and knowledge. You’re so focused on Palestine you don’t give a fuck out the war on women that is also taking place.

Anyone who’s main focus for this election is Palestine is best case scenario, a moron.

Your feverish focus on Palestine over all other issues, zealotry.

Name calling anyone that doesn’t have the same devotion to your primary issue is also zealotry.

Me pointing out both-sides-ism and you calling me a zealot, also zealotry and boorish.

Says the zealot. Your projecting. Again.