And yet people are willing to call him an “AI theorist” or an “AI researcher”. That’s like calling me the theologian who finally cracked the Problem of Evil with my Hellraiser fics.
And yet people are willing to call him an “AI theorist” or an “AI researcher”.
Its technically correct to call him both - he “theorises” about a pseudoscientific idea that conflates the living, breathing human mind with spicy autocomplete, and “researches” how plagiarism-fueled lying machines can magically become omniscient omnipotent acausal robot gods and turn all of humanity into paperclips.
That is pretty cool, less cool is that there is no option to read them without voiding my rights.
By checking this box, you consent to the processing of your personal data in the United States and other jurisdictions in connection with our provision of AO3 and its related services to you. You acknowledge that the data privacy laws of such jurisdictions may differ from those provided in your jurisdiction. For more information about how your personal data will be processed, please refer to our Privacy Policy.
Also dont think this is legally binding, acknowledging they are different doesnt mean much. But IANAL.
And yet people are willing to call him an “AI theorist” or an “AI researcher”. That’s like calling me the theologian who finally cracked the Problem of Evil with my Hellraiser fics.
Its technically correct to call him both - he “theorises” about a pseudoscientific idea that conflates the living, breathing human mind with spicy autocomplete, and “researches” how plagiarism-fueled lying machines can magically become omniscient omnipotent acausal robot gods and turn all of humanity into paperclips.
That is pretty cool, less cool is that there is no option to read them without voiding my rights.
Also dont think this is legally binding, acknowledging they are different doesnt mean much. But IANAL.
Blake “Evil Solver” Stacey
Bruv no way lmaou ty for this