They know the man who killed Charlie Kirk recently was positioned on a roof. I am sure he left some traces behind. A single hair of the killer or some skin particles should be enough to find evidence against him in a man hunt?
They know the man who killed Charlie Kirk recently was positioned on a roof. I am sure he left some traces behind. A single hair of the killer or some skin particles should be enough to find evidence against him in a man hunt?
I am no expert on this matter, I wanted to hear how difficult it is to convict him. As you point out, finding evidence against a suspect in such a case is pretty hard, once he can leave far away.