fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoReal Talkmander.xyzimagemessage-square32linkfedilinkarrow-up1518arrow-down11
arrow-up1517arrow-down1imageReal Talkmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square32linkfedilink
minus-squareMicrow@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33·1 month agoWorst case scenario: The peer reviewer is Gabor.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·1 month agoBest Case Scenario: Gabor agrees the paper was crap
minus-squareMaturin [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoYour comment combined with Zote’s made for an excellent synthesis.
minus-squareZoteTheMighty@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoIf your reviewer suggests you cite another paper, it’s one of their papers and they just doxed themselves, 100% of the time.
Worst case scenario:
The peer reviewer is Gabor.
Best Case Scenario:
Gabor agrees the paper was crap
Your comment combined with Zote’s made for an excellent synthesis.
If your reviewer suggests you cite another paper, it’s one of their papers and they just doxed themselves, 100% of the time.