However I find myself being disagreed with quite often, mostly for not advocating or cheering violence, “by any means possible” change, or revolutionary tactics. It would seem that I’m not viewed as authentically holding my view unless I advocate extreme, violent, or radical action to accomplish it.

Those seem like two different things to me.

Edit: TO COMMUNISTS, ANARCHISTS, OR ANYONE ELSE CALLING FOR THE OVERTHROW OF SOCIETY

THIS OBVIOUSLY ISN’T MEANT FOR YOU.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This was literally a conversation I had with queermunist (I am almost sure; it was a while ago but I am fairly confident that was the other participant when I had the exchange). I’m just filling OP in on the content and recommending they try to experiment themselves, because I think it’s an extremely relevant contribution to OP’s understanding of the answer to their question.

    smug

    Dude I am King Smug; it is 100% fair

    manipulative bullshit

    Not really

    • MarciaLynnDorsett@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      it is manipulative. it is designed to distract from the subject at hand and imply that the person being asked is acting in bad faith if they don’t chase your red herring.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah that was how the person reacted when I asked it that other time, too. Like HOW DARE YOU ASK ME ABOUT MY BELIEFS, THAT IS A DIRTY TRICK

        I found it very notable, too, that perfectly normal reaction. Not like “why is Central America relevant to this lol” but “how dare you”