• dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What’s wrong with WebP? It’s a modern format with smaller file sizes, and most software supports it. It’s very commonly used online these days instead of the legacy formats.

    • MDKAOD@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Photoshop only recently supported webp natively. Windows barely supports webp.

      Inb4 “have you heard of linux”

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        is “recently” less than 15 hours ago because that’s when the comment was made

        • MDKAOD@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          In what capacity? Because the Photos app does not. Hence ‘barely’. Also HEIC support is globally shit. Apple can eat a dick.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            In what capacity?

            The built-in APIs for handling images (GDI+) added WebP support in 1809. This is mentioned in the the documentation for the drawing library in C#/.NET, which is a wrapper around GDI+: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.drawing.imaging.imageformat.webp?view=net-8.0

            I haven’t tried it in the Photos app recently, and don’t have a Windows system handy right now to try it out, but I know it works for sure in Paint, which uses GDI+ for image encoding/decoding (and thus supports all formats that Windows itself supports).

            Of course, apps that use their own encoding/decoding code might have fewer features and support fewer formats than the native Windows code.

            Edit: Apparently it works fine in the Photos app if you just change the extension? Which means Microsoft is doing something weird. The code to decode WebP must be there.

            • cheddar@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The built-in APIs for handling images (GDI+) added WebP support in 1809.

              The end user doesn’t work with Windows API. The end user works with web sites and apps, which are rarely native these days. And there you’re often limited to png/jpg for uploads.

    • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Good luck using webp in any kind of collaborative diagramming software.

        • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Maybe because in those scenarios PNG offers sharper images, which is more important than compression when you have complex diagrams. Or because webp is more CPU intensive, and PNG gives better performance when rendering. Or because of CVE-2023-4863.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            PNG offers sharper images, which is more important than compression when you have complex diagrams

            WebP supports both lossy and lossless compression. Diagrams should use lossless compression so the image does not lose any quality.

            PNG gives better performance when rendering

            Images on the web usually aren’t large enough for this to make a significant difference, and it can sometimes be offset by the quicker download time.

            because of CVE-2023-4863.

            libjpeg and libpng have had a number of CVEs too though.

            • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              WebP supports both lossy and lossless compression.

              WebP did not always support lossless compression. It’s conceivable that the tools’ developers made the decision before that.

              Images on the web usually aren’t large enough for this to make a significant difference, and it can sometimes be offset by the quicker download time.

              That does not fit the use case of diagramming tools. They usually have comparatively few assets that are used multiple times in the same document. The larger the document, the more benefit lower CPU cost has. And I’ve seen LARGE diagrams.

              libjpeg and libpng have had a number of CVEs too though.

              Fair. I’m just speculating that it might be a contributing factor for the tools still not supporting the format.

              • dan@upvote.au
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                WebP did not always support lossless compression. It’s conceivable that the tools’ developers made the decision before that.

                WebP was first released in 2010, and lossless support was added in 2011. I really doubt there were tools built between 2010 and 2011 that haven’t been updated since then.

                That does not fit the use case of diagramming tools. They usually have comparatively few assets that are used multiple times in the same document.

                SVG is probably a better fit for this use case.

    • ninjabard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I download memes to share them. Messenger does not like webp. It literally won’t allow me to send the image. I then have to edit the image just so I can send it. Now I have two copies of the same meme.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I thought WebP was fixed in Messenger a while back. You mean Facebook Messenger, right? I’ll see if I can figure out what’s up.

      • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Which messenger? Signal and WhatsApp support it.

        Edit: saw your reply below, it’s Facebook Messenger. Yeah, that’s a whole other problem of its own.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Google voice iirc still doesn’t support webp.

        Might be a fine standard but support is shit ime. I’d prefer everyone just take up jpeg xl.

        • Baku@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Google docs and sheets don’t support WebP either. Always ironic when they made the fucking format

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just rename it into a .jpg extension instead

        Seems to just work for what i need them for ¯_(ツ)_/¯

        Ive had one or two that didn’t but i could open then in gimp and export that way.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just rename it into a .jpg extension instead

          Seems to just work for what i need them for ¯_(ツ)_/¯

          This usually means the app supports WebP but is doing something dumb like not allowing the WebP file type but not the .webp file extension. If that’s the case, it’s often a one-line code fix.