Join the IWW to unionize your workplace for a general strike, and bring their machinery to a halt!

Spread the word, share it around, show your friends and family how to unionize!

    • Mystic Mushroom [Ze/Zir]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nope, they sat by and watched as Germany sunk into fascism and began their ethic cleansing and putting people in cattle cars to take to camps, if Germany had never invaded Poland they would’ve continued to sit by and do fuck all.

    • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nope. The US, UK and France weren’t waging war on fascism in any way whatsoever - they were waging war on rival empires.

      That’s the whole reason they never went to war with Francoist Spain - they helped him into power, after all.

  • grumpusbumpus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The trouble is: the poster misrepresents the situation. The guy wearing the red hat is the one holding the rifle and bayonet this time.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      This sounds like the defeatist attitude they want you to have. Just give up, it’s hopeless. No one is helping you.

      No, I don’t think I will. I think I’ll do something. We need more people feeling empowered to take back this country. Not thoughts of hopelessness.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Germany didn’t want to, at least not a majority. Maybe if Germans would have known where it was going (unwinnable war vs all neighbours at once etc), they would have tried early. US Americans have the advantage of this knowledge.

          • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Unfortunately, that knowledge doesn’t just help those who wish to fight against it. Those who seek that kind of authoritarian power also were able to learn what worked and what didn’t.

            They then spent decades patiently cultivating the type of society, through extensive social manipulation that has since been exacerbated thanks to expanding technology, to create the perfect environment for them to try again.

            This is all by design of those who hold the levers of industry to further facilitate their concentration of wealth.

    • PirateFrog@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Consider that Germany was in far more dire straits economically, and Hitler’s approval was crazy high even towards the end of the war (something like 60 or 70%). So the entire time the opposition was outnumbered.

      In comparison, Trump’s approval is around 45%.

      • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Once white people are getting vanned for lack of patriotic fevour I’m sure Trumps ratings will increase, too.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Look up the history. Hitler wasn’t elected by a majority but appointed by an elite and then killed the opposition. There was massive opposition before, including street battles. But that’s also why he got the dictatorial power. Apporoval means nothing if people obey executive orders.

        • PirateFrog@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Could you link some sources for that massive resistance? Wikipedia says there was very little organized resistence for most of his rise to power, and the regime was SO popular amongst the populace, it prevented even anti-nazi’s in the intelligence services from acting on their underground networks.

          What we’re seeing with the current fairly widescale open resistence is far beyond anything that happened in Germany.

            • PirateFrog@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Eh, generally not a fan of Parenti, as he gives far too much of a pass to authoritarian marxist-leninists regimes for my comfort.

              Thanks for the going through the legwork to share the link, though.

              • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                https://youtu.be/npkeecCErQc

                This is what Parenti would say to that. 3:15 for the relevant part. But the whole story is good. I hope you open yourself up to some more historical materialism and not discount someone because they understand the history more than what you’ve been told.

                Parenti definitely doesn’t give a pass like you say. But he understands the material circumstances in which revolution occurs. What you call “authoritarian” might me seizing lands from slave plantations in Cuba. I’m not sure exactly what you mean. But I really think you should more reading from him not less. Especially, if you haven’t even read his most iconic book. (The one I recommended). Have you actually read anything from him?

                • PirateFrog@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  I’ve watched his Yellow speech, and I’ve read segments from Blackshirts and reds. I understand his point of view, but I fundamentally disagree with his conclusions.

                  Seizing land from capitalists is fine, it’s what bureaucratic marxist-leninist regimes do with it afterward that bothers me. It’s an age old disagreement between ML’s and Anarchists that stretches back to at least the Russian Revolution war, and is something that cannot be compromised on.

                  Cuba’s agrarian reforms eventually centralized the majority of farming land under state control instead of simply all of it to the people in a decentralized manner. They were later forced to do after the USSR fell in the 90’s, did not cede such power without that outside force.

                  That centralization, that state control, is what I detest and denounce, as it furthers the ability for coercive and unequal hierarchies to exist and flourish in an ideology that is supposedly supposed to eliminate them. The ML argument is that it must be done to survive against the enemies of socialism, and may point to the fact that there was never a long-term anarchist society as proof that decentralized power doesn’t work, but then they conveniently pass over the fact that all promising Anarchist revolutions were actively fought and suppressed by ML’s, such as the betrayal of Nestor Mahkno’s Black Army of Ukraine, the Anarchists during the Spanish Revolution, The Kronstadt Rebellion, and many more.

                  You suggest I simply misunderstand history, yet it was through intense historical research that I came to what, at least to me, seemed like self evident conclusions based on historical fact. The fundamental disagreement between us is that we will likely always disagree on what is fact, misinterpretation, or fiction. You trust your sources, I have come to trust mine, and thus our conclusions, and perhaps even our mental reality, will lead us to reject each other’s solutions to the same problem we all face: Capitalism.

                  To return to Parenti; his view is to suggest that the downsides of Marxist-Leninist regimes do not offset the material living condition improvements for the people living under them.

                  I contend that minimizes just how unjust and evil those downsides truly are. I would personally find living under the USSR just as hellish as living under Capitalism. I might have better healthcare, but then I’d have to contend with living in a deeply distrustful society where having the wrong thought could land me in the gulag or executed, all while a bureaucratic elite dictate how things will be structured and run no differently from a capitalist boss.

                  I have read enough ML literature and watched enough documentaries to know that I want nothing to do with that ideology, and I assume you feel the same about Anarchism, otherwise you’d be one, eh? 😅

                  If not, then I would implore the same from you, in that you open yourself up to Anarchist critique of Marxist-Leninism.

          • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            The scale of the opposition would be difficult to quantify - the whole reason liberals hand power to fascists in the first place is to violently suppress dissent against the status quo, after all.

            Italy gives a clue, however - almost the entire north of Italy was liberated by antifascist Partisan movements (before the US and UK suppressed them, of course.) The same thing happened in Greece - and Greece had turned fascist even before Italy and Germany did.

            So yeah… Hitler’s (supposed) “popularity” should be viewed with the same suspicion as Putin’s.

            • PirateFrog@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              So yeah… Hitler’s (supposed) “popularity” should be viewed with the same suspicion as Putin’s.

              Fair enough, though I could also see Hitlers public approval rating being real for a few reasons.

              1. Unlike Putin & Trump, Hitler seemed to give frequent economic concessions to industrial workers to prevent dissent.
              2. Their economy did improve (due to imperialist conquest and ransacking obv, which most of the population didn’t seem bothered about)
              3. His supporters seemed to suffer the same cognitive dissonance cult-like worship that MAGA currently suffers under (despite their economic conditions getting worse in the US), but perhaps on a much wider scale.

              I’m not well read enough on Greek or Italian fascism to know if Mussolini or Metaxas were worse at quelling dissent or keeping the non-targeted groups ‘happy’, but from what I recall of Mussolini, his conquests were far less successful than Hitler’s, which may have limited his economic ability to keep people pacified in the same way.

          • plyth@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Resistence is too late. There was opposition before the nazis gained power.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichsbanner_Schwarz-Rot-Gold

            German site says 2.5 million members were organized mostly by SPD, with 250,000 in the elite units:

            From

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung

            Its primary purposes were providing protection for Nazi rallies and assemblies, disrupting the meetings of opposing parties, fighting against the paramilitary units of the opposing parties, especially the Roter Frontkämpferbund of the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) and the Reichsbanner Schwarz-Rot-Gold of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), and intimidating Romani, trade unionists, and especially Jews.

            By the time Hitler assumed power in January 1933, SA membership had increased to approximately 2,000,000

            Strangely there is no information about the conflicts. This is what I found, on the site of the communist units who also fought the nazis.

            Since the strategy of the SA was to fight and provoke, violent encounters between the RFB and SA soon became a part of everyday life.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roter_Frontkämpferbund

            • PirateFrog@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I wasn’t aware of the scale of those opposition parties, the Reichsbanner in particular. I also can’t really find much info on their conflicts pre-1932, I assume they are only written about in German? Definitely an interesting topic to delve into.

              Cheers for sharing the solid research :)

          • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            From what I recall from Behind the Bastards, a major part of Hitler’s bloc was the upper middle-class. Shopkeepers, factory managers, so on. It basically came down to the opportunity to eliminate wealthy Jews, and taking their stuff - fancy furniture, buildings, their businesses, ect. The destruction of the Jews was a matter of greed that happened to fit hand-in-glove with racist ideology.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      notably the soviets. but we don’t have any equivalent today thats willing to do that.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      LOL ‘help’
      The Soviets killed 85% of the nazi troops.
      The rest was all other countries combined.
      And they would’ve been on the Atlantic in no time without trouble if the allies hadn’t come in to take a piece of the European loot.
      The nazi’s enemy were the communists.
      They didn’t fight as much against the west which gave them all the chances to surrender and escape punishment.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That’s the spirit - we’ll win if we just post enough memes! C’mon, who’s with me? Let’s get scrollin!

    • asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The unionist versus confederate war never ended, it just went into a cold war phase for awhile and is now heating up again.

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        IMO, other nations like Canada, Germany, and so forth will have relations with the Blue States in a civil war. Trump’s regime is a terrible trading partner, dishonest, evil, abrasive, and generally just unlikable for anyone who has good sense or pragmatism. During the 1st American Civil War, the South had major issues, because they didn’t have much trade with Europe - which meant supply shortages, a lack of wealth, and so forth. That cotton may have been picked by slaves, but isn’t going to become lucre if it sits in a warehouse.

        After awhile, when the Blue States have a more formal coalition, I think Europe will go beyond trade to offer war support. That is the sort of thing that needs troops to be readied, mentally and materially. It would be kinda like how America was in the leadup to Pearl Harbor. We were doing stuff to indirectly support the Allies, even if our blood wasn’t spilt.

        • PirateFrog@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I can’t discount that possibility. I could see them supplying the blue states covertly, similar yo how France did during the Spanish Civil War, but I’m not so confident on if they’d send boots to help.

          This does assume the military fractures for an open civil war to take place. Without that, we’re looking at an Irish troubles situation, I figure.

      • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t think we’ll be getting any backup this time, it’s up to us.

        If you don’t, you’re screwed - bullets don’t grow on trees… not even in the US.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      And yet notice that no Western democracy has condemned this.

      When Iran protests and the police get violent against them, the west condemns them and pledges supports for democracy and yet here there’s silence.

      • belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not saying that these protests are getting suppressed but: The Iranian Police didn’t use rubber bullets to shoot protesters. They actually shot protesters. They abducted a 16 year old girl, raped and beat her to death and 2 weeks later returned the body to the family, claiming she committed suicide.

        They hanged at least 8 people for protesting. The Iranian state didn’t just get violent, they slaughtered their citizens in the streets.

      • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Hitler was very popular in the US and UK until about 1938…

        All that resisting and fighting took place once War had started. We left the Jews, LGBT, Socialists, disabled people, Roma, Poland and Checkoslovakia, and dissenting Germans to be rolled over and ground up first because potential woke-socialist mind virus was scarier than literal fascism.

    • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      from my central european perspective, currently there is not much we could do. It is an matter of internal US politics, and on the grand scale, it’s not like your whole country is on fire. Sure, we can send harsh letters or something, but i don’t think our input would even make it on the topics debated in congress. And everything else like military action would just make us the enemy. i don’t think there is anything that would unite the US faster than that - under TACOs banner, so thats the last thing you want (ignoring that we couldn’t even pull something like this off without help from China, noone else comes even close in military strength. don’t forget, you guys have the strongest airforce, and then the second strongest airforce, and i think the 4th strongest airforce is US too)

      so, you have my moral support, and i can post in your support, but i think thats about it until you are deep into civil war territory. sorry 😟

  • TL903@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    There is nothing to beat? You all become the established rule and become the new conservatives of the nation as you age, going against the grain in younger years just meant you had the wrong idea of gradual change.

    Then you can look down when you are older and tell them youngens just how wrong they are and to make a country great again by the same mindset you wanted to change it in the past.

    Idealism, enemy of everyone, friend to none. But we are all idealists.

    • belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      “nooo, don’t call the fascists fascists, they are just conservatives pining for a non-existent, ethnopurist, mythical past while deporting people to camps using emergency powers. That’s like, totally not fascism.”

    • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Fuck this nonsense, you’re just a kowtowing coward fuck, I have become far more progressive in my old age. You’re just a fucking coward and a tool making excuses for your lack of spine, we are not all as weak as you.

        • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Have fun dying as a coward choking on the cock of authority, if that’s how it is I’ll gladly die with the blood and flesh of fascists in my teeth rather than begging on my knees.

          Fuck you.

          • TL903@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            We all need a job to make ends meet, we all want freedom by having half of our working time to ourselves and to pursue other interests, we all want to die meaning something to someone.

            Perhaps your way is to call others like me bad words.

            Cool.

            • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              All I’m reading here is “if the authoritarian regime puts its dick in your mouth, just suck it to completion and then let them Put a bullet in your head.”

              You are the exact kind of evil that these fuckers require you to be, you are an enabler of death and fascism, you feeble piece of shit. Get fucked and go die, the world is better off without the pawns of authoritarian rhetoric like yourself, you fascist piece of shit.

                • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Supporting and enabling fascists makes you a fascist, point blank, and asking stupid obvious questions just shows how fucking obvious your stance is. Get fucked, we know you’re not that stupid, you’re just a fucking cunt. We see you, and we will remember you.