• cor@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        if they make it almost exactly the same and “credit” it in the smallest font possible and didn’t get permission from the original author… i would say that’s definitely a ripoff

        • elvith@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          didn’t get permission from the original author

          Tell me you don’t know xkcd without saying you don’t know xkcd. These comics are licensed as CC-BY-NC 2.5, which means you are allowed to remix and use them, without explicitly asking for permission, as long as you attribute the original/author (which is given here) and as long as you do it non-commercially (which is given for this post IMHO).

          • cor@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.

            that’s not attribution.

          • cor@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Tell me you don’t know xkcd without saying you don’t know xkcd.

            tell me you’re completely uncreative without telling me you’re completely uncreative.

            the rest of what i said stands… but whooooa you “got me” i didn’t read the license on xkcd

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      In a version that doesn’t even fully make sense. With databases there is a well-defined way to sanitize your inputs so arbitrary commands can’t be run like in the xkcd comic. But with AI it’s not even clear how to avoid all of these kinds of problems, so the chiding at the end doesn’t really make sense. If anything the person should be saying “I hope you learned not to use AI for this”.