• Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hoping someone might be able to help me out with this info, I’ve tried looking and can’t find a solid answer.

    When you use the “Save and close group” feature of tab groups, do they

    1. Stay forever, no matter if you close Firefox, restart your pc, not used that group in months etc.

    2. Allow an unlimited, or at least a high number, of saved and closed tab groups.

    I mainly ask because it specifically puts closed and saved tab groups in a section called “recent tab groups” which sounds suspiciously temporary.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Noooo it has AI garbage, what the hell.

    I really need this feature, I have over 500 tabs open right now, I just hope it works well.

  • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    “You asked, we built it” --> “People keep shitting on us for our terrible decisions… Quick let’s do something people actually want to compensate ! Wait let’s also slap AI on it, I’m sure everyone will love that” (Mozilla being Mozilla I guess…)

    • vivendi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      People love to hate on Mozilla without knowing shit. Some of it is literally 4Chan grade manipulation as well.

      Like the whole ToS debacle. People just aren’t interested in truth just rage 24/7

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah pretty sad. It would be a much more useful feature for me on mobile.

      On desktop, I usually just create a new window for different types of stuff.

      No easy way to organize my infinite tabs on mobile (as far as im aware).

      Chromium browsers on mobile do this, but it’s also a bit weirdly complicated/frustrating to work with at times, I hope of Firefox get to it, they can make it super simple.

  • sgibson5150@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    So they’re reintroducing a feature in 2025 that they added to Firefox in 2010 and subsequently removed in 2013. Such progress. Much wow.

  • x4740N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Still waiting for mobile, tab groups missing from Firefox mobile is the only reason I’m still using chrome

  • arsCynic@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    “You asked, we built it” = “Your data is profitable, so we slapped AI on it and feign altruism”.

  • starman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why not just using fucking bookmarks? What’s the point of all this “organization” when it’s ephemeral anyway? I don’t get it why most people are so allergic to bookmarks.

    • balssh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Scenario: working on two tickets and having some yt/spotify/whatsapp in background. I separate the tickets and tabs related to them in their own tab groups and the social media tabs in another group. I can easily navigate through them and have less mental overhead on where everything is, especially if I color code the groups.

  • Captain Beyond@linkage.ds8.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    smart tab groups, a new AI-powered feature that suggests names and groups based on the tabs you have open.

    Yeah sure ok. Did the community ask for this too?

    • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      For one second I thought Mozilla might have made something that wasn’t anti-feature… But OF COURSE it’s going to need to have AI 😑

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t care about AI when it’s doing minor things like this it’s when they’re shoving it down our throats and we don’t want it.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I mean, why not?

      They integrated accessibility focused, local, AI pretty well.

      Loads of folks bitched about it because they were triggered by “AI”, but it’s essentially invisible, as it should be.

      I hate naming things, that’s actually something AI is good at, hell yeah, let it name my shit for me please.

      Then again, these communities are always full of Debby downers who hate on everything.

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        [Dr. Who meme format]

        Is AI bad?

        It Depends. Large corporate AI hosted at a data centre that consumes a nuclear reactor’s worth of power and a lake’s worth of water for cooling for the purpose of generating slop stolen from Artists and Writers? Yes.

        Locally run embedded AI designed for a specific task to automate small processes or enhance the UI experience with little cost to local computing resources because it’s been properly optimised? No.

        • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          a datacenter is more efficient than lots of smaller individual computers doing calculations independently. They actually make their stuff as efficient as possible, otherwise it hurts margins. So, if you’re against datacenter AI because of power, then just stop using ai. If everyone ran locally, the efficiency would be significantly worse overall.

          I actually hate what llms have become, but efficiency is still not a good way to compare a datacenter to a home computer.

          • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            A consumer would use a lower token AI compared to large datacenters. I am sure it does less environmental damage, because the home user doesnt need tap water for cooling.

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      What do you mean by vertical tab groups? Cause we just got tab groups and a while ago we got vertical tabs. And you can ofc use them together. Isn’t that vertical tab groups?

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Was I signed up for some beta? I’ve had firefox groups for a few weeks now.

    And holy shit do I need em.

      • Prontomomo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        A/B testing a very effective mass testing ground, I’m surprised some people don’t do it. Amazon is probably doing a few dozen a/b tests constsntly