What is your general attitude towards those who believe in religion whether they are jewish, Muslim, Christian etc etc.

Do you get on well with any religious friends and neighbours?

Have you ever thought of believing in a religion at some point?

If you do not like the faiths, why?

If you DO, also why? Does this come from your family? Maybe something went bad during your life?

I get that Lemmy might have the same stereotype in Reddit that there are loads of atheists, but there’s a good reason why despite criticism of religion, it is still here.

P.S. I am not religious or anti religious in any fashion, I am agnostic.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Anti-science, misogyny, etc. are bad independently of whether they are done in the name of religion, or pseudoscience, or political ideology. Doing bad things in the name of religion is exactly as bad as doing them in the name of communism, or capitalism, or racial ideology, etc.

    • Krono@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Anti-science, misogyny, etc may be bad independently of religion, but they aren’t independent of religion. Religion is a source of these problems.

      You can imagine a hypothetical religion that is simply a “social club” or whatever, but here in the real world religion comes with baggage.

      Religion is why my cousin’s children have never seen a doctor in their life. Religion is why my gay friend in high school tried to kill himself. Religious indoctrination has led to lifelong shame and trauma in many of my friends.

      And this was just from a “moderate” sect of Christianity- the millions living under fundamentalist religion have it even worse.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Every terrible thing done under religion has been done without religion. None of them have happened without people (except for killing the different). Maybe people are the problem and religion is just one of many tools that can be used to harm other people. Tribalism exists in many forms, religion in its many flavors being just one of them.

        • Seleni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil - that takes religion. -Steven Weinberg

          • fubo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Maoism did a lot of evil without any religion. Were all of its perpetrators bad people?

        • Krono@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Saying “maybe people are the problem” is reductive and unhelpful. But I agree with you broadly, religion is just a system or a tool, it can be used for good or evil.

          To judge if religion is a good system or a bad one, we can use a cost benefit analysis. This is what we have been attempting to do in this thread.

          But when it comes to sensitive subjects like religion, many people have a tendency to avoid, overlook, and deny the associated costs.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Saying “religion is the problem” when the problem crops up in many different areas regardless of which religions are present in an area or if religion isn’t present at all makes it seem like you might be focusing on the wrong thing. Nationalism, religion, strong ideologies, groups with deep emotional bonds and a sense of insularity are all susceptible to the same things - charismatic leaders can easily direct their attention and they have a tendency towards directing their hostility towards groups that don’t fit into their group.

            So, tribalism. And if one tool won’t work, or is removed completely from access, those who wish to use tribalism to mobilize a large group to help them achieve their goals will just use the next one that is available to them. The tools are rarely what are important to them, but the results. So I don’t see how focusing on one tool, even a particularly well-suited tool, will solve the problem.