• mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Not good enough is a stepping stone to good enough and a great starting point for done.

    Reward what works, disengage what doesn’t, and promote ideas that can grow.

    Sceptism is important, dissent is healthy, but recognizing what will progress society and putting effort into that is what’s needed now.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The problem is building an insufficient number of homes, below the rate of population growth, at government expense, costs taxpayers money without solving the problem. Worse, it takes the place of effective solutions.

      When we learn more about this proposal, we can understand if it would lower the cost of housing. Until then, skepticism is warranted.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think it doesn’t matter whether new construction is funded by taxpayers or not. We all end up paying either way through various channels. I think what matters is how much money is collected as profit due to what we build, how we build it and how much we build.

        • sbv@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          The problem I’m trying to highlight is that this plan may give developers sweetheart deals, but leave housing prices at unaffordable levels.

          It may not, but the strategy of flooding the market will fail if we don’t manage to build enough houses.