• Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      2 days ago

      “1900s” makes me think they’re referring to the decade of 1900-1909 😅

        • Carrot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          They aren’t? “Late 1900s” would be the latter 3rd of the century. 1994 would be in that latter third, so they are using it correctly.

            • Carrot@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              I get what you’re saying, but both work in this case, yours is just more precise. We’ve just lived in the late 1900s so it feels weird to lump the years we’ve experienced in with 900+ that we haven’t. But if someone says “late 1800s” for something like 1894, it wouldn’t feel weird at all.

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That stings, but not quite as much as century as with that my brain now has to go through the process of determining which century when it never had to before.

          • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            2 days ago

            Century has that human element because “last century” is where old people are from. You wouldn’t meet people from the last millennium, but you know people from the last century. It’s 100 years, that’s a lifetime. Implying that you’re from the “last” one means you’re not from “this” one. Aka, ancient.