hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-21 month agorulelemmy.blahaj.zoneexternal-linkmessage-square187fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkrulelemmy.blahaj.zonehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-21 month agomessage-square187fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTheDoozer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 month agoAnd I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoAnd would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.
And I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
And would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.