• someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      If you are the one claiming it’s the perfect cargo plane, even better than cargo planes, it’s on you to prove it. What even is this conversation, it started you thinking cargo airplanes were civilian and then you just duck and weave on everything in the weirdest way.

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think the missing piece here is that B-52 isn’t just a pretty good cargo hauler, it’s a pretty good cargo hauler that we don’t need to buy a whole new airframe to get. Think of it less as “we’re commissioning these B-52s” and more as “hey look we found a way to use all these B-52s we already had” only this just keeps working forever.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Well they upgraded all the engines at some point. I don’t know the cost breakdown between engines vs frame but I don’t think it’s good.

          • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Gotta be cheaper than buying new planes which would also have new engines. Generally there needs to be a pretty substantial increase in capability before it’s worth retiring an existing platform, especially in a logistics role where you don’t get as much benefit from the bleeding edge because nobody’s supposed to be shooting at you in the first place.