This subject tends to draw out the worst in people, oddly enough. She has this strange Order of horny men and faux-feminists who will die defending her over I don’t know what. If that’s you, please, put your emotions aside for a second, and look at Sydney Sweeney objectively (ignore the large rack, blonde hair, and smooth skin and LOOK AT HER)… Is she “beautiful”? She kinda has a horse-mouth smile, her eyes are weirdly far apart, she has big ears, and a pug nose. Sexy, sure. But any woman can be sexy if she’s not obese and has Hollywood image juggernaut at her disposal. Koinophilia? Check. Properly proportioned body? Check. Youthful? Check. But is she beautiful? Personally, I’d say no. Just another busty blond that frankly is probably a lovely woman, and she is attractive no doubt… but she’s no work of art.

  • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
    0·
    6 days ago

    No they said beauty standards are rooted in white supremacy. Meaning things like modeling agencies prefering they models to have hair styles and textures that are more likely to be found on Caucasian models.

    • Pavel Chichikov@lemm.eeOPEnglish
      0·
      6 days ago

      Lmfao, literally the whole world prefers caucasian models. ever been to Asia? Africa? I have, and everywhere I went the universal obsession with beauty was basically arian women. its nothing to do with racism and everything to do with the fact that objectively those traits are extremely beautiful.

      • papalonian@lemmy.world
        0·
        6 days ago

        In one comment you call someone racist for saying that beauty standards are rooted in white supremacy, and in your following comment you “explain” how Aryan women are objectively more beautiful than women of other races.

        Do you hear yourself? You think that these “studies of beauty” are anything other than horny, objectifying dudes rating women’s bodies. Surprise surprise, those dudes think white women are hotter than non-white women. This is where that other person’s comment on phrenology came from, you’re referencing pseudoscience as if it’s fact.

        And before you call me a fanboy defending whoever the fuck you’re talking about, I’ve got no idea who she is, and whether or not I would find her personally attractive is irrelevant. Your question and the entire premise is weird, and your justification behind it when being called out is rooted in more problematic ideology.