• Literal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Because the idea that a man attracted to trans women could not be straight is transphobic. Trans women are women and a man attracted to women can be straight regardless of whether they’re trans or cis.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      True, but if a guy doesn’t like male genitalia and the woman is non-op, well, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with him not wanting to have sex with her. That’s his preference and it’s valid.

      • Literal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Not sure what that has to do with what I said. I didn’t suggest anyone should be compelled to have sex with anyone…

    • EldenLord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I would argue that sexual attraction to a non-op trans woman involves attraction to male genitalia, which by definition and logic extend beyond the label “straight”. A different case would be a man attracted to masculine presenting women (tomboys), or post-op trans women, which would not rule out bisexuality, but be within the defining bounds of straightness.

      Because the visual overlap between non-op trans women and femboys is quite noteworthy, an umbrella term for attraction to both male and female identities such as “bisexual” is appropriate. Denying that is arguably Bi-erasure! I hope you understand my point.

      • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Nah. Even if it’s hetero, it’s probably not straight. Straightness is similar to whiteness; simply a term to say “you’re normal and deserving of respect.” It’s a normal word, not simply a descriptive one.

        Dating a nonbinary person as a binary person is definitionally hetero, but hard to call straight. An agender person and a bigender person would totally be het, but totally not be straight. If it’s not a relationship between 2 monogamous, cishet people assigned opposite sexes at birth, it’s weird and unnatural.

        Bigots can literally gatekeep straightness from a cishet woman dating a cisbi man. It’s like a tainting of her for being with a queer person, even if neither she nor the relationship is queer. It doesn’t matter if they’re monogamous for life; it’s one drop of queerness poisoning their ability to be normal. They’d need to hide his true orientation.

        • EldenLord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          You definitely have a point there, although I would say that any person with interest in cis-hetero relationships only could call themselves straight.

          Mods here deleted my comment, idk why tho. Seems like a classic case of: "bisexuality is le heckerino transphobia!!1!!1!