NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ

If it’s not sunny where you live, then you just get electricity from where it is sunny. It’s really really simple

Yeah, really, really simple. Wait, what are transmission losses?

Take shrooms and watch as the divisions between the little bits break down into absolute chaos :D

Have you ever swiped on your phone, but the screen doesn’t move (due to end of content, or unknowingly being an unswipable screen), and you feel your eyes jerk automatically in reflex, predicting the movement that didn’t happen?

And then there’s the rare moment when you think they have it so you let go and it falls to the floor 😭

I lowkey wanna try it out. If I do, I will send pics. (It will be off brand.)

I think it’s fitting. He himself would be physically fine whilst everything collapses around him when the floor drops out.

Eh, he might be a cis het white Christian who hates what’s going on?

Capitalism.

No country would be insane enough to embargo the single greatest economic power on Earth.

Sure, it makes for a great lens. You can use it to read the writing on the wall.

I hear what you’re saying, and you’re 100% correct, but I think most people will realize it’s a figure of speech, and easier to say than “Via the process of gene mutation trial and error over many, many generations of tigers, spots have developed on their ears that look like eyes, resulting in predation from behind being discourged.”

Fair enough, I suppose it is interesting!

In terms of the question, “Are there more infinite sequences that contain Hamlet or more that don’t?”- in the context of true randomness and truly infinite sequence, this feels like almost a trick question. Almost every truly random infinite sequence will contain Hamlet an infinite number of times, along with every other possible finite sequence (e.g., Moby Dick, War and Peace, you name it). In fact, the probability of a random infinite sequence not containing Hamlet is effectively zero.

Where it becomes truly interesting is if you have an infinite number of infinite sequences. Now you’d certainly get instances of those “effectively zero” cases, but only in ratios within infinity itself, haha. I guess that’s probably what you were getting at?

I could have worded that better. Any probability with a non-zero chance of occurring will occur an infinite number of times given an infinite sequence.

To address the comment you linked, I understand what you’re saying, but you’re putting a lot of emphasis on something that might as well be impossible. In an infinite sequence of coin flips, the probability of any specific outcome - like all heads - is exactly zero. This doesn’t mean it’s strictly impossible in a logical sense; rather, in the language of probability, it’s so improbable that it effectively “never happens” within the probability space we’re working with. Theoretically, sure, you’re correct, but realistically speaking, it’s statistically irrelevant.

Infinite monkeys. Any probability greater than zero times infinity is infinity. You will see an infinite number of monkeys hitting A and an infinite number hitting B. If there were a finite number of monkeys, you would be correct, but that is not the case.

To my knowledge, people close to the borders where propaganda can effectively reach are already quite aware that their government is a joke. They’re just stuck there.

Hey now, I’ve been to the post office…within the last two years or so.

That’s Butte and Yolo for me.

Wtf? Why am I benefiting most under Harris? Shouldn’t the be the guys on the very bottom?

I mean, I’ll take it, but…weird?

(also fuck Trump, he can eat dirty diapers)

That graph is interesting. When was Reagan president again…?

No, E=mc² demonstrates that mass and energy are one in the same. When converting mass to energy, nothing is being destroyed, merely changing state. As far as we are aware, the absolute destruction or removal of energy, and thereby matter, from the Universe is not possible.