• rubikcuber@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    51 minutes ago

    Yes. It enforces a bubble by its very nature. There is no main feed, by default you see people you follow and posts they interact with. I don’t have a problem with that. I wouldn’t go into a pub with racists, and xenophobes, so I shouldn’t have to do it online.

    Anyway, first thing I did was sign up for a couple of blocks lists, and what saw was awful people.

    Also, if you look a the moderation settings, there is a lot of objectional content that is or can be hidden basic of topic flags. This is content that on any sane networks should be banned and the users suspended. But of Bluesky its just hidden from view.

    It’s basically a microcosm of the Internet. It’s not the Good Place for sure, and anyone who thinks that is deluded.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Critical mass of users on social media platforms.

    Back on Usenet decades ago they called it the “Eternal September”.

    It used to be that every September, fresh University students would gain access to Usenet for the first time, and there would be a rough adjustment period where they don’t yet know the ropes, the lingo, the etiquette, the unspoken rules, and the expectant decorum, etc. Then one year, home internet service providers made Usenet accessible to ANYONE who subscribed… And from that day forward, it was like September every day, all year round.

    Now the general riffraff are flocking to bsky because even THEY see that Twitter is sinking. This surge of new users have brought all their bad habits with them. Bsky must adapt or it too will fall.

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yet another case in point of how shitty mastodon’s name is. Even its abbreviations are trash. The best time to change its name was before it started. The second best time is NOW. And the longer they go without fixing this, the worse it will be. As long as mastodon never rebrands, it is doomed to fall behind scummy oligarch controlled trash like threads.

  • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I have seen an uptick in posts saying “block this maga/Nazi/etc” but I haven’t personally directly seen any. I use the Following feed so I only see posts from the people I’ve specifically asked to.

  • zaph@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Dude needs to learn about blocklists if that’s what his feed looks like. There definitely is a cesspool but it’s pretty isolated.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There are exceptions of course but IMHO, you shouldn’t block toxic contents, you call them out instead. Doing so basically puts a red flag to any would-be readers that this person and the associated content is harmful and dangerous.

      • nawa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Calling out bad actors gives them an audience. Nine of your readers will agree that this person is a piece of shit but the tenth will think “hmm maybe there’s some truth to this” and follow that bad actor. And that’s how it propagates. No, nothing but blocks and silent treatment to people feeding on outrage.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    There is no real safe place. You need a platform that allows you to moderate it down to a place you can live with.

  • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Every social media is collective of thousands of social bubbles.

    While I advocating for federated SNS, I personally rarely encounter any toxicity on internet except when I interact with westerner (especially Americans). I carefully choose who I follow and interact, and the algorithm are trained with my interaction to put content that not toxic and relevant to me.

    On fediverse alone, I have multiple account that delivers entirely different social experience. My English mastodon.social account that just slightly touch Western politics are thousands times toxic. Even my personal regional political discourse feed on Twitter, Instagram, or Facebook are not as toxic as Western politics on fediverse.

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Honestly I want to believe this but I’ve had 0 bigoted accounts ever come into my bluesky replies, when on twitter this would be a daily occurrence.

    I’ve met one tankie, and blocked them, but that’s it, and I have 1.7k bluesky posts and 8k followers.

    In my time in mastodon, I didn’t experience bigots either, but neither have I in bluesky, and I’m an easy target, I’m disabled and my face looks deformed, it’s my profile picture, while on twitter I’d get snide remarks every day, it’s never been the case on bluesky, and I had one mastodon user make a joke (but that’s just one user).

  • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    All I saw were furries and dicks, and no way to filter them other than blocking all 18+ posts. And apparently everyone and their mother is a findom expert there, or just abusive in nature. Luckily I still don’t understand those type of self centered narcissistic social media platforms and what to do on them.

  • IMNOTCRAZYINSTITUTION@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    the original post strikes me as shit stirring. I just opened blue sky for the first time and there was nothing “toxic” it was mostly landscape photos, memes, cat pics and news.

  • Breve@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    It’s the eternal cycle:

    • Small platform has quality experience because most users are genuine and engaged, and user base is too small to be “worth it” for corporations and trolls
    • Platform grows slowly until it reaches tipping point of popularity and network effect
    • The platform has explosive growth, drawing interest of corporations and trolls
    • Corporations enshittify while trolls crank out misinformation and rage bait
    • Users reach tipping point and leave large platform to smaller platforms that don’t have corporate interests and trolls
    • Repeat due to network effect
    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      For a lot of Twitter users, this is their first collapse and migration. Usually these events make people more mobile in the future.

      I wonder if and when they’ll start moving on from Bluesky? What event will trigger it next time? How much the experience will have to fall apart before they pack up and move? My money is on ‘way less than last time’.

  • MeatAndSarcasmGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I moved over to Bluesky basically the minute I could get an invite, because I could see the writing on the wall for Twitter; and there is SOME toxicity for sure, but you control how much.

    Bluesky has a completely chronological feed composed singularly of accounts you follow. If you don’t follow shit-stirrers, you will not see any shit.

    Having said that, they can still show up in the “comments” of skeets you’ll see, but the block system is so effective, that they are not usually showing up anyways.

    To me, that is the difference between Bluesky’s moderation and other websites. Bluesky has very little official moderation, but has extremely powerful blocking tools (their blocks server connections between subskeet, there are curated block lists, atomic blocking, etc). If you subscribe to trusted and vetted block lists, you will probably never see a chud on Bluesky in your life. You do need to verify the trustworthiness of the list in advance, though…

  • Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The trolls and fascists do not exist on Twitter to hang out with other trolls and fascists. They’re there hunting for liberal tears. When their prey leaves, they follow.

    Bluekky has been open about not moderating their platform. They’ve provided users tools to not see the shit they’re letting through the door – which, yes, is currently better than Twitter, where the current ownership believes that ‘free speech’ is deserving of a captive audience – but if the bsky algorithm thinks you have something – anything, really – in common with the Nazis, they’ll get shunted into your timeline, leaving you to play wack-a-mole.