• Z3k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeh it was system x I worked on out default was redhat. I forget the other options but win and mac sure as shut wasn’t on the list

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        but it did not stick.

        Yeah. It was bad. The job of a Supercomputer is to be really fast and really parallel. Windows for Supercomputing was… not.

        I honestly thought it might make it, considering the engineering talent that Microsoft had.

        But I think time proves that Unix and Linux just had an insurmountable head start. Windows, to the best of my knowledge, never came close to closing the gap.

        • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          But, surely Windows is the wrong OS?

          Windows is a per-user GUI… supercomputing is all about crunching numbers, isn’t it?

          I can understand M$ trying to get into this market and I know Windows server can be used to run stuff, but again, you don’t need a GUI on each node a supercomputer they’d be better off with DOS…?

          • Badabinski@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I could see the NT kernel being okay in isolation, but the rest of Windows coming along for the ride puts the kibosh on that idea.

          • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            But, surely Windows is the wrong OS?

            Oh yes! To be clear - trying to put any version of Windows on a super-computer is every bit as insane as you might imagine. By what I heard in the rumor mill, it went every bit as badly as anyone might have guessed.

            But I like to root for an underdog, and it was neat to hear about Microsoft engineers trying to take the Windows kernel somewhere it had no rational excuse to run, perhaps by sheer force of will and hard work.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          At this point I think it’s most telling that even Azure runs on Linux. Microsoft’s twin flagship products somehow still only work well when Linux does the heavy lifting and works as the glue between

          • sep@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Where did you find that azure runs on linux? I have been qurious for a while, but google refuse to tell me anything but the old “a variant of hyper-v” or “linux is 60% of the azure worklad” (not what i asked about!)

            • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Good question! I can’t remember.

              I think I read a Microsoft blog or something like a decade ago that said they shifted from a Hyper-V based solution to Linux to improve stability, but honestly it’s been so long I wouldn’t be shocked if I just saw it in a reddit comment on a related article that I didn’t yet have the technical knowhow to fully comprehend and took it as gospel.

            • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Where did you find that azure runs on linux?

              I dont know of anywhere that Microsoft confirms, officially, that Azure, itself, is largely running on Linux. They share stats about what workloads other are running on it, but not, to my knowledge, about what it is compared of.

              I suppose that would be an oversimplification, anyway.

              But that Azure itself is running mostly on Linux is an open secret among folks who spend time chatting with engineers who have worked into he Azure cloud.

              When I have chatted with them, Azure cloud engineers have displayed huge amouts of Linux experience while they sometimes needed to “phone a friend” to answer Windows server edition questions.