• deranger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Apple definitely chose it to be a dick.

    What other image format supports HDR and modern compression algorithms? AVIF also requires a special codec. This is just codec stuff, I really don’t see it as anyone being a dick. Android can also use these modern formats, with the same requirements if you want to open them on Windows.

    Kinda surprising to me that people so frequently recommend using Linux here, yet taking 30 seconds to install a free codec on Windows is apparently a big deal.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      OpenEXR. Though it probably could use a spec upgrade, in particular add JPEG-XL to the list of compression algorithms. It’s not like OpenEXR’s choices are bad, the lossy ones are just more geared towards fidelity than space savings, kind of the opposite of what you want for the web where saving space is often paramount and fidelity a bonus.

      Bonus: Supports multi-channel, so not just RGBA. Not terribly useful for your run off the mill camera, very useful in production where you might want to attach the depth buffer, cryptomatte etc and I guess you could also use it for the output of light field cameras. Oh there’s also multi-view so you can store not just stereo images but also whole all-around captures and stuff. There’s practically nothing pixel-related you can’t do with it though it might require custom tooling.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          What other image format supports HDR and modern compression algorithms that don’t require a license?

          There, ftfy. You answer the question.

          • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago
            1. are you implying that there is indeed no better choice?
            2. webp, but that’s google. jpeg xt, but i see virtually no one adopting that.
          • deranger@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            I dunno, JPEG XT maybe? At a loss here.

            Why did Android also use HEIC, did they choose this just to be a dick like Apple?

      • deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Let’s try this again: in a world where Apple is not a dick, what modern image format do they use that isn’t subject to these same codec requirements?

        If they were doing this just to be dicks, they’d spin off one of their own formats like they did with ALAC. They didn’t, they used HEIC which was also used by Android (which is now using AVIF).