• pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’m definitely all for Ukraine winning, but this is bullshit, basically the red scare all over again (but for tech).

  • nentypaushessen@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    For me as an old fart this all sounds like such a stupid thing… who cares if someone who volunteer to work for an software project is a Russian, German, Iranian or - God forbid - an Frenchman. My personal - and of course completely insignificant - opinion is that politics should stay out.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    This is dumb. Corporate divestment, sure, of course, fuck their money and their power structures. But open-source developers are not generally gung-ho about the war effort… let alone propping up their local military-industrial complex.

    • LukácsFan1917@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      This is the only plan the west has to win the war. Keep fucking over random Russians in the hopes Putin somehow becomes politically vulnerable over this, despite opposition getting weaker than ever throughoit the war and with the onset of sanctions. Now we are asking random Linux contributors, please come back when you’ve overthrown your government for us.

      Russia is of course the only country that has ever invaded another country so it’s only fair.

      No matter how many vulnerabilities are introduced into software by western allied intelligence agencies, we should never be held accountable for dealing with them ourselves. After all Russians are uniquely responsible for their tyrannical government because of their Asiatic brainpans.

    • kredditacc@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      How to piss off people 101.

      Do you fail to remember how the tech world collectively cringe at one guy who intentionally injected malware into his own npm library to delete all data from Russia and Belarus?

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I don’t agree with communists either but open source software is supposed to be about more than that

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        It is a tricky topic that is hard to get right. For instance the CoreJS dev is Russian and he is maintaining a library that is depended on by a large number of counties.

        In general I support any action to further distance Russia but I can understand how the Russian maintainers feel. After all they may or may not support Russia.

        The likely cause of this was the fact that it looks bad on paper for Linux to have Russian involvement. After all that’s where all the “hackers” live. Somehow I think this was probably in response to a threat behind closed doors.

        I also would be concerned about counties trying to compromise foss but unfortunately that is just as likely to come from the US as it is from Russia.

        • nanook@friendica.eskimo.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          @possiblylinux127 @BobGnarley One would hope there are enough checks and balances such a major opensource project as Linux to keep malware out of the kernel regardless of who contributes to it, but we do there have been some instances where that was not the case.

          I see the evolution of the Internet as humanity growing a nervous system, and anything that gets in the way of that as negative.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            I’ve never heard of malware making into the kernel. The closest I’ve head was that university “research project” that tried to insert backdoors.

  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    My first thought is that this was to make Linux palatable to western regulations, like how companies can’t use Kaspersky anymore. Stupid if I’m right because it’s not like the fsb is going to sneak spyware into Linux.

  • fireshell@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Linus Torvalds Confirms Decision to Remove Maintainers from Russia

    You couldn’t come up with a more powerful spit in the direction of FOSS. And from Linus, who is now kind of showing f*ck to the entire community. Here you have freedom, openness and all that. Today they just wiped their ass with it, and by one of the founders.

    This is the moment when the split politics, dirty ones from all sides, have penetrated into the very heart of OpenSource - into the Linux kernel.

  • blob42@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    LMFO I was on the reddit thread reading this post and coudn’t believe my eyes reading the comments. We’re living truly revelation times. Like you said this is a long due wakeup call for the rest of the “uncivilized” world.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I think the Russians that would want to backdoor stuff would just use a name like John.

  • Agility0971@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    This is such an odd thing to do… I really cannot see the benefits for the project doing this. Maybe those maintainers were payed for their work and sanctions prohibit paying them or something?

      • endofline@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        But where do you have information that it was russian state? There are many state actors capable of doing this. Just saying

      • LukácsFan1917@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Even Wikipedia, which is a shockingly bloodthirsty pro-NATO outlet, admits there is zero proof that a “Russian state actor” did this, there are just “western security experts” claiming it (as usual), and opinion is divided.

        Did you even read this or do you just vaguely remember a Wired article? I have been able to see through these obvious ploys since I was a teenager reading about cold war propaganda (okay that was like 5 years ago but still SMDH)

        Great sign for discussion that hacking is still being treated by Redditors as Russian, Chinese, and North Korean until proven otherwise. 🤕

          • LukácsFan1917@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            I wonder if there are any official US documents declaring an intent to hide cyberattacks under the flags of foreign nations? 🤭 Wouldn’t that be droll?

          • LukácsFan1917@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            The funny thing is Stuxnet is a good example of how sanctions can backfire. We used a supply chain attack and the Iranians hardened their systems. Can anyone really claim it was any different than another Mossad “humiliate them and hope something happens” operation that ultimately blew the cover off years of intelligence work?

            The Lebanon pagers attack, Russian sanctions and CERN or Linux creating reverse brain drain will continue to backfire, on our ability to even twist these screws, also on our supply chains in countries which consider themselves a US target or even just a middleman.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Even Wikipedia, which is a shockingly bloodthirsty pro-NATO outlet, admits there is zero proof that a “Russian state actor” did this, there are just “western security experts” claiming it (as usual), and opinion is divided.

          Well, I don’t think that a “[insert your preferred state] state actor” would ever coming out saying “yes, we tried to to it”.

          Not to say that what Wikipedia say is false but on the other hand I am not sure how to check if it is true, in these cases.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      He’s Finnish by heart even though he lives in the US. I think it is probably a pretty big worry for him that Russia might invade Finland.

      I doubt this is something that he would initiate but if there was any pressure from other parties (I’m sure there was) I don’t think he is going to fight it.

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        he’s just an American nationalist at heart. his dad was a member of the Russian communist party and his biography seemed to make clear that rebelled from that.

        socially he’s not terrible but when the war drums come beating he’s stepping in line for the stars and stripes

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          socially he’s not terrible but when the war drums come beating he’s stepping in line for the stars and stripes

          Like pretty much every Finn would these days, really.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I understand that.

        But he also sits at the heart of the open-source community, and his actions might ripple through the entire sector. With this much influence, allowing your personal fears to chime in is unacceptable.

        Once we start fragmenting open-source the way we fragment everything else, we lose the very spirit of it and open doors to so much potential power abuse.

        Besides, I really don’t see how restricting Russian maintainers would prevent Russian military aggression. If something important there is powered by Linux, it can be forked and modified to serve a specific need. Not to mention Finland is now part of NATO.

    • tekato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Actually insane lol. But you can’t expect much from anybody who willingly takes money from IBM.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Gotta have them “various compliance requirements”, man, gotta have’em. Don’t ask me what they are, but damnit, gotta have’em.