fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 days agoCheekymander.xyzimagemessage-square223fedilinkarrow-up11.25Karrow-down17
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageCheekymander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square223fedilink
minus-squarewebghost0101@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down6·7 days agoMy teachers used to say the same about Wikipedia. I did edit heavily, this is 3 outputs combined including a fact check this using Wikipedia It does not fail on such basic questions, “fact check this:” in a new instance works more reliably then asking a human.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·33 minutes agoand they’re correct about not using wikipedia as a source, you use wikipedia as a summary and then verify the information in the ACTUAL sources it cites
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 days agoI think the hate is a bit unwarranted, but be wary that it does sometimes fail anything
My teachers used to say the same about Wikipedia.
I did edit heavily, this is 3 outputs combined including a fact check this using Wikipedia
It does not fail on such basic questions, “fact check this:” in a new instance works more reliably then asking a human.
and they’re correct about not using wikipedia as a source, you use wikipedia as a summary and then verify the information in the ACTUAL sources it cites
I think the hate is a bit unwarranted, but be wary that it does sometimes fail anything